Conservation Genetics

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 419–435 | Cite as

Conservation genetics of the franciscana dolphin in Northern Argentina: population structure, by-catch impacts, and management implications

Research article

Abstract

Evaluating population structure in the marine environment is a challenging task when the species of interest is continuously distributed, and yet the use of population or stock structure is a crucial component of management and conservation strategies. The franciscana dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei), a rare endangered coastal cetacean, suffers high levels of by-catch all along its distribution range in the Western South Atlantic, and questions have been raised about boundaries or divisions for population management. Here we apply genetic tools to better understand population structure and migration, sex-biased dispersal, and to assess potential genetic and demographic impacts of by-catch. Our analyses, based on mtDNA control region sequences, reveal significant genetic division at the regional level and fine-scale structure within our study area. These results suggest that the population in northern Buenos Aires is the most isolated population in Argentina. We found no significant departure from an equal sex ratio among the by-caught animals. A few cases of multiple entanglements appeared to be mother–calf pairs based on field observations and individuals sharing the same mtDNA control region lineage. The distribution of haplotype frequencies observed could imply that some maternal lineages are more prone to be subject to higher rates of by-catch, although biopsy sampling is necessary to fully evaluate whether maternal lineage distributions are the same for biopsy sampled and by-caught animals. A genetic indication of population size disequilibrium was detected for all populations in Argentina, which is consistent with available rates of by-catch and abundance estimates. Collectively, our findings support the current scheme of larger recognized Franciscana Management Areas (FMA), but argue for a finer-scale subdivision within Northern Buenos Aires region (FMA IV). Finally, an integrated approach to promote conservation of this endangered small cetacean has to involve identification of genetic and demographic threats, a more sustainable fishery strategy to reduce by-catch, and designation of protected areas that are supported by underlying population structure for franciscana dolphins.

Keywords

Franciscana dolphin By-catch impacts Population structure Conservation genetics Management 

References

  1. Adams LD, Rosel PE (2006) Population differentiation of the Atlantic spotted dolphin (Stenella frontalis) in the western North Atlantic, including the Gulf of Mexico. Marine Biol 148:671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albareda D, Albornoz N (1994) Mortalidad de Franciscanas en la Pesqueria Artesanal de San Bernardo y Mar de Ajo-Prov. de Buenos Aires, Argentina. In 2° Encontro sobre Coordinacăo de Pesquisa e Manejo da Franciscana (In Spanish)Google Scholar
  3. Amos W, Balmford A (2001) When does conservation genetics matter? Heredity 87:257–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrade A, Pinedo MC, Pereira JJ (2000) As franciscanas do Sul do Brasil, Uruguai e Argentina constituem distintos estoques? UNEP/CMS (ed.) Report of the Third Workshop for Coordinated Research and Conservation of the Franciscana Dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei) in the Southern Atlantic, 26–28 November 1997, Buenos Aires, Argentina. UNEP/CMS, Bonn.112 pp (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
  5. Arnason E, Petersen PH, Kristinsson K, Sigurgislason H, Palsson S (2000) Mitochondrial cytochrome b DNA sequence variation of Atlantic cod from Iceland and Greenland. J Fish Biol 56:409–430Google Scholar
  6. Avise JC (1995) Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism and a connection between genetics and demography of relevance to conservation. Conserv Biol 9:686–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Aznar FJ, Balbuena JA, Raga JA (1994) Helminth communities of Pontoporia-Blainvillei (Cetacea, Pontoporiidae) in Argentinean Waters. Can J Zool—Revue Canadienne Zool 72:702–706Google Scholar
  9. Aznar FJ, Raga JA, Corcuera J, Monzon F (1995) Helminths as biological tags for franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) (Cefacea, Pontoporiidae) in Argentinian and Uruguayan waters. Mammalia 59:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baker CS, Weinrich MT, Early G, Palumbi SR (1994) Genetic impact of an unusual group mortality among Humpback Whales. J Hered 85:52–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Berggren P, Wade PR, Carlstrom J, Read AJ (2002) Potential limits to anthropogenic mortality for harbour porpoises in the Baltic region. Biol Conserv 103:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bezzi SAR, Boschi E (eds) (2000) Sintesis del estado de las pesquerias maritimas argentinas y de la Cuenca del Plata. Anos 1997–1998, con una actualizacion de 1999, Publicaciones especiales, INIDEP, Mar del PlataGoogle Scholar
  14. Bordino P, Albareda D, Fidalgo G (2004) Abundance estimation of Franciscana dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei) from boat surveys in Buenos Aires, Argentina.Technical paper SC56/SM13. 56th IWC Meeting, Sorrento, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  15. Bordino P, Kraus S, Albareda D, Fazio A, Palmerio A, Mendez M, Botta S (2002) Reducing incidental mortality of Franciscana dolphin Pontoporia blainvillei with acoustic warning devices attached to fishing nets. Marine Mammal Sci 18:833–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bordino P, Thompson G, Iñíguez M (1999) Ecology and behaviour of the franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) in Bahía Anegada, Argentina. J Cetacean Res Manage 1:213–222Google Scholar
  17. Bordino P, Wells RS (2005) Radotracking of Franciscana Dolphins (Pontoporia blainvillei) in Bahia Samborombon, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 16th Biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals, San Diego, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  18. Brennin R, Murray BW, Friesen MK, Maiers LD, Clayton JW, White BN (1997) Population genetic structure of beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas): mitochondrial DNA sequence variation within and among North American populations. Can J Zool 75:795–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brumfield RT (2005) Mitochondrial variation in Bolivian populations of the variable antshrike (Thamnophilus caerulescens). Auk 122:414–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buonaccorsi VP, Kimbrell CA, Lynn EA, Vetter RD (2005) Limited realized dispersal and introgressive hybridization influence genetic structure and conservation strategies for brown rockfish, Sebastes auriculatus. Conserv Genet 6:697–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cassens I, Van Waerebeek K, Best PB, Crespo EA, Reyes J, Milinkovitch MC (2003) The phylogeography of dusky dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obscurus): a critical examination of network methods and rooting procedures. Mol Ecol 12:1781–1792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cassens I, Van Waerebeek K, Best PB, Tzika A, Van Helden AL, Crespo EA, Milinkovitch MC (2005) Evidence for male dispersal along the coasts but no migration in pelagic waters in dusky dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obscurus). Mol Ecol 14:107–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chivers SJ, Dizon AE, Gearin PJ, Robertson KM (2002) Small-scale population structure of eastern North Pacific harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) indicated by molecular genetic analyses. J Cetacean Res Manage 4:111–122Google Scholar
  24. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Colombo JC, Cappelletti N, Barreda A, Migoya MC, Skorupka CN (2005) Vertical fluxes and accumulation of PCBs in coastal sediments of the Rio de la Plata estuary, Argentina. Chemosphere 61:1345–1357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Colombo JC, Cappelletti N, Lasci J, Migoya MC, Speranza E, Skorupka CN (2006). Sources, vertical fluxes, and equivalent toxicity of aromatic hydrocarbons in coastal sediments of the Rio de la Plata Estuary, Argentina. Environ Sci Technol 40:734–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Corcuera J, Monzon F, Crespo EA, Aguilar A, Raga JA (1994) Interactions between marine mammals and the costal fisheries of Necochea and Claromeco (Buenos Aires Province). IWC Special issue 15, pp 283–289Google Scholar
  28. Crespo EA, Harris G, Gonzalez R (1998) Group size and distributional range of the Franciscana Pontoporia blainvillei. Marine Mammal Sci 14:845–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crespo EA, Pedraza SN, Grandi FM, Dans LS, Garaffo G (2004) Abundance estimation of Franciscana dolphins, Pontoporia blainvillei, in Buenos Aires province, Argentina, from aerial surveys. Technical paper SC/56/SM9. 56th IWC Meeting, Sorrento, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  30. Dalebout MK, Hooker SK, Christensen I (2001) Genetic diversity and population structure among northern bottlenose whales, Hyperoodon ampullatus, in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Can J Zool 79:478–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dawson S M, Read A, Slooten E (1998) Fingers, porpoises and power: Uncertainties with using fingers to reduce by catch of small cetaceans. Biol Conserv 84:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dawson SM, Slooten E (1993) Conservation of Hector Dolphins—the case and process which led to establishment of the Banks–Peninsula–Marine–Mammal–Sanctuary. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshw Ecosyst 3:207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Escorza Treviño S, Dizon AE (2000) Phylogeography, intraspecific structure and sex-biased dispersal of Dall’s porpoise, Phocoenoides dalli, revealed by mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA analyses. Mol Ecol 9:1049–1060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Excoffier L, Smouse P, y Quattro J (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 136:343–359Google Scholar
  35. Feral JP (2002) How useful are the genetic markers in attempts to understand and manage marine biodiversity? J Exp Marine Biol Ecol 268:121–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frankham R (1995) Conservation genetics. Annl Rev Genet 29:305–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Godoy JA, Negro JJ, Hiraldo F, Donazar JA (2004) Phylogeography, genetic structure and diversity in the endangered bearded vulture (Gypaetus barbatus, L.) as revealed by mitochondrial DNA. Mol Ecol 13:371–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goudet J, Perrin N, Waser P (2002) Tests for sex-biased dispersal using bi-parentally inherited genetic markers. Mol Ecol 11:1103–1114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Guerrero RA, Acha EM, Framinan MB, Lasta CA (1997) Physical oceanography of the Rio de la Plata Estuary, Argentina. Continental Shelf Res 17:727–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harpending HC (1994) Signature of ancient population-growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial–DNA mismatch distribution. Human Biol 66:591–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hartl DL, Clark AG (1997) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  42. Harwood J (1999) A risk assessment framework for the reduction of cetacean by-catches. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshw Ecosyst 9:593–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hey J, Machado CA (2003) The study of structured populations—new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nat Rev Genet 4:535–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoelzel A (1994) Genetics and ecology of whales and dolphins. Annl Rev Ecol Syst 25:377–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoelzel A (1998) Genetic structure of cetacean populations in sympatry, parapatry, and mixed assemblages: implications for conservation policy. J Hered 89:451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hoelzel AR, Hancock JM, Dover GA (1991) Evolution of the cetacean mitochondrial D-loop region. Mol Biol Evol 8:475–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Hooker SK, Gerber LR (2004) Marine reserves as a tool for ecosystem-based management: the potential importance of megafauna. Bioscience 54:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Houlden BA, Costello BH, Sharkey D,Fowler EV, Melzer A, Ellis, Carrick F, Baverstock PR, Elphinstone MS (1999) Phylogeographic differentiation in the mitochondrial control region in the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus (Goldfuss 1817). Mol Ecol 8:999–1011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hudson RR, Slatkin M, Maddison WP (1992) Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132:583–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Huret M, Dadou I, Dumas F, Lazure P, Garcon V (2005) Coupling physical and biogeochemical processes in the Rio de la Plata plume. Continent Shelf Res 25:629–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jaureguizar AJ, Menni R, Guerrero R, Lasta C (2004) Environmental factors structuring fish communities of the Rio de la Plata estuary. Fish Res 66:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jefferson TA, Van Waerebeek K (2002) The taxonomic status of the nominal dolphin species delphinus tropicalis van Bree, 1971. Marine Mammal Sci 18:787–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. King TL, Burke T (1999) Special issue on gene conservation: identification and management of genetic diversity. Mol Ecol 8:s1–s3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1989) Dynamics of Mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6196–6200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lasta C (1995) La Bahía Samborombón: zona de desove y cría de peces. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, p 304Google Scholar
  57. Lasta CA, Acha E (1996) Cabo San Antonio: su importancia en el patron reproductivo de peces marinos. Frente Maritimo 39–46Google Scholar
  58. Lazaro M, Lessa EP, Hamilton H (2004) Geographic genetic structure in the franciscana dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei). Marine Mammal Sci 20:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lundquist CJ, Granek EF (2005) Strategies for successful marine conservation: Integrating socioeconomic, political, and scientific factors. Conserv Biol 19:1771–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Majluf P, Babcock EA, Riveros JC, Schreiber MA, Alderete W (2002) Catch and bycatch of sea birds and marine mammals in the small-scale fishery of Punta San Juan, Peru. Conserv Biol 16:1333–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Messenger SL, McGuire JA (1998) Morphology, molecules, and the phylogenetics of cetaceans. Syst Biol 47:90–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moller LM, Beheregaray LB (2004) Genetic evidence for sex-biased dispersal in resident bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Mol Ecol 13:1607–1612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morizur Y, Berrow SD, Tregenza NJC,Couperus AS, Pouvreau S (1999) Incidental catches of marine-mammals in pelagic trawl fisheries of the northeast Atlantic. Fish Res 41:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Natoli A, Birkun A, Aguilar A, Lopez A, Hoelzel AR (2005) Habitat structure and the dispersal of male and female bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 272:1217–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) Bottleneck effect and genetic-variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nielsen R, Wakeley J (2001) Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach. Genetics 158:885–896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. O’connor WP (1991) A numerical-model of tides and storm surges in the Rio-De-La-Plata Estuary. Continent Shelf Res 11:1491–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ott P, H (1994) Estudo da ecologia alimentar de Pontoporia blainvillei (Gervais & D’Orbigny, 1884) (Cetacea, Pontoporiidae) nas comunidades perqueiras do litoral norte de Rio Grande do Sul, Sul do Brasil. Pontifica Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, p 120Google Scholar
  70. Palsboll PJ, Vader A, Bakke I, Elgewely MR (1992) Determination of gender in Cetaceans by the polymerase chain-reaction. Can JZool—Revue Canadienne De Zool 70:2166–2170Google Scholar
  71. Palumbi SR (2003) Population genetics, demographic connectivity, and the design of marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13:S146–S158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Palumbi SR, Cipriano F (1998) Species identification using genetic tools: the value of nuclear and motochondrial gene sequences in whale conservation. J Hered 89:459–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pinedo MC (1982) Analises dos conteudos estomacais de Pontoporia blainvillei e Tursiops gephireus na zona estuarial e costeira de Rio Grande, RS, Brasil. Fundacao Universidade do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, p 95Google Scholar
  74. Pinedo MC (1991) Development and variation of the Franciscana, Pontoporia blainvillei. University of California, Santa Cruz, p 142Google Scholar
  75. Pinedo MC, Praderi R, Brownell RL (1989) Review of the biology and status of Franciscana, Pontoporia blainvillei. Perrin WF, Kaiya Z, Jiankang L (eds) Biology and conservation of River Dolphins, pp 46–51Google Scholar
  76. Posada D, Crandall K (2001) Intraspecific genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol Evol 16:37–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Raymond, Rousset FM (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rogers AR, Fraley AE, Bamshad MJ, Watkins WS, Jorde LB (1996) Mitochondrial mismatch analysis is insensitive to the mutational process. Mol Biol Evol 13:895–902PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Rogers AR, Harpending H (1992) Population-growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic-differences. Mol Biol Evol 9:552–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Rosa S, Milinkovitch MC, Van Waerebeek K, Berck J, Oporto J, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Van Bressem MF, Goodall N, Cassens I (2005) Population structure of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA variation among South American Burmeister’s porpoises (Phocoena spinipinnis). Conserv Genet 6:431–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rosel PE, Dizon AE, Haygood MG (1995) Variability of the mitochondrial control region in populations of the Harbor Porpoise, Phocoena-Phocoena, on Interoceanic and regional scales. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:1210–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rosel PE, France SC, Wang JY, Kocher TD (1999) Genetic structure of harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena populations in the northwest Atlantic based on mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Mol Ecol 8:S41–S54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rosenbaum H, Clapham P, Allen J, Nicolejenner M, Jenner C, Florezgonzalez L, UrbánJ, Ladron P, Mori K, Yamaguchi M, Baker C (1995) Geographic-variation in ventral fluke pigmentation of humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae populations worldwide. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 124:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messegyer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 12:2496–2497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Secchi ER, Danilewicz D, Ott PH (2003) Applying the phylogeographic concept to identify franciscana dolphin stocks: Implications to meet management objectives. J Cetacean Res Manage 5:61–68Google Scholar
  86. Secchi ER, Wang JY (2002) Assessment of the conservation status of a franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) stock in the Franciscana Management Area III following the IUCN Red List process. Latin Am J Aquat Mammals 1:183–190Google Scholar
  87. Secchi ER, Wang JY, Murray BW, Rocha-Campos CC, White BN (1998) Population differentiation in the franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) from two geographic locations in Brazil as determined from mitochondrial DNA control region sequences. Can J Zool—Revue Canadienne Zool 76:1622–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sellas AB, Wells RS, Rosel PE (2005) Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses reveal fine scale geographic structure in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Gulf of Mexico. Conserv Genet 6:715–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tajima F (1983) Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105:437–460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Taylor BL, Dizon AE (1999) First policy then science: why a management unit based solely on genetic criteria cannot work. Mol Ecol 8:S11–S16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Valsecchi E, Zanelatto RC (2003) Molecular analysis of the social and population structure of the franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei): conservation implications. J Cetacean Res Manage 5:69–75Google Scholar
  93. VanWaerebeek K, Reyes JC (1990) Catch of small cetaceans at Pucusana Port, Central Peru, during 1987. Biol Conserv 51:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. VanWaerebeek K, VanBressem MF, Felix F, AlfaroShigueto J, GarciaGodos A, ChavezLisambart L, Onton K, Montes D, Bello R (1997) Mortality of dolphins and porpoises in coastal fisheries off Peru and southern Ecuador in 1994. Biol Conserv 81:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wakeley J (1996) Distinguishing migration from isolation using the variance of pairwise differences. Theoret Popul Biol 49:369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wang JY, Gaskin DE, White BN (1996) Mitochondrial DNA analysis of harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena, subpopulations in North American waters. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:1632–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Waples RS (1998) Separating the wheat from the chaff: Patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J Hered 89:438–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Waples RS, Gaggiotti O (2006) What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol Ecol 15:1419–1439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Weber DS, Stewart BS, Garza JC, Lehman N (2000) An empirical genetic assessment of the severity of the northern elephant seal population bottleneck. Curr Biol 10:1287–1290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Weinrich MT, Rosenbaum H, Baker C, Blackmer AL, Whitehead H (2006) The influence of maternal lineages on social affiliations among humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) on their feeding grounds in the southern gulf of maine. J Hered 97:226–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Mendez
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • H. C. Rosenbaum
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • P. Bordino
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Fundacion Aquamaria—CECIMPinamarArgentina
  2. 2.Cetacean Conservation and Research ProgramWildlife Conservation Society-International ConservationBronxUSA
  3. 3.Center for Biodiversity and ConservationAmerican Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics and Center for Conservation Genetics at the American Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental BiologyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  6. 6.Wildlife Trust AllianceNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations