Conservation Genetics

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 97–105 | Cite as

Maintenance of high pollen dispersal in Eucalyptus wandoo, a dominant tree of the fragmented agricultural region in Western Australia

  • Margaret ByrneEmail author
  • Carole P. Elliott
  • Colin J. Yates
  • David J. Coates
Research Article


Pollen dispersal was investigated in five remnant populations of Eucalyptus wandoo, a dominant insect-pollinated tree in the fragmented agricultural region of southern Western Australia. Paternity analysis using six microsatellite loci identified a pollen source for 45% of seedlings, and the remainder were assumed to have arisen from pollen sources outside the stands. Outcrossing was variable, ranging from 52 to 89%, and long distance pollen dispersal was observed in all populations with up to 65% of pollen sourced from outside the populations over distances of at least 1 km. Modelling dispersal functions for pollination events within the two larger populations showed little difference between the four two-parameter models tested and indicated a fat-tailed dispersal curve. Similarity of direct and indirect historical estimates of gene flow indicates maintenance of gene flow at levels experienced prior to fragmentation. The study revealed extensive long distance pollen dispersal in remnant patches of trees within a fragmented agricultural landscape in the southern temperate region and highlighted the role of remnant patches in maintaining genetic connectivity at the landscape scale.


Pollen dispersal Paternity analysis Dispersal function Fragmentation Eucalyptus 



We thank Bronwyn Macdonald for assistance with laboratory work, Richard Fairman for assistance with fieldwork, and Matt Williams for fitting the dispersal curves. This work was supported by Land and Water Australia.


  1. Aldrich PR, Hamrick JL (1998) Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in a fragmented tropical forest mosaic. Science 281:103–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C, Klein EK, Oddou-Muratorio S, Smouse PE, Sork VL (2004) Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol 13:937–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbour RC, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE (2005) Pollen dispersal from exotic eucalypt plantations. Cons Gen 6:253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacles CFE, Burczyk J, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA (2005) Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution 59:979–990Google Scholar
  5. Bird PR, Bicknell D, Bulman PA, Burke SJA, Leys JF, Parker JN, van der Sommen FJ, Voller P (1991) The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock. In: Prinsley RT (ed) The role of trees in sustainable agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 59–86Google Scholar
  6. Brondani R, Brondani C, Tarchini R, Grattapaglia D (1998) Development, characterisation and mapping of microsatellite markers in Eucalyptus grandis and E. urophylla. Theor Appl Genet 97:816–827Google Scholar
  7. Brown EM, Burbidge AH, Dell J, Edinger D, Hopper SD, Wills RT (1997) Pollination in Western Australia, a database of animals visiting flowers. Handbook No. 15, WA Naturalists’ Club, PerthGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne M, Parrish TL, Moran GF (1998) Nuclear RFLP diversity in Eucalyptus nitens. Heredity 81:225–232Google Scholar
  9. Byrne M, Macdonald B, Francki M (2001) Incorporation of sodium sulfite into extraction protocol minimizes degradation of Acacia DNA. Biotech 30:742–748Google Scholar
  10. Campinhos EN, Peters-Robinson I, Bertolucci FL, Alfenas AC (1998) Interspecific hybridisation and inbreeding effect in seed from a Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla clonal seed orchard in Brazil. Genet Mol Biol 21:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Celebrezze T, Paton DC (2004) Do introduced honeybees (Apis mellifera, Hymenoptera) provide full pollination service to bird-adapted Australian plants with small flowers? An experimental study of Brachyloma ericoides (Epacridacae). Aust Ecol 29:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaix G, Gerber S, Razafimaharo V, Vigneron P, Verhaegen D, Hamon S (2003) Gene flow estimation with microsatellite in a Malagasy seed orcjhard of Eucalyptus grandis. Theor Appl Genet 107:705–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chase MR, Moller C, Kesseli R, Bawa KS (1996) Distant gene flow in tropical trees. Nature 383:398–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dick CW, Etchelecu G, Austerlitz F (2003) Pollen dispersal of tropical trees (Dinizia excelsa, Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine and fragmented Amazonian rainforest. Mol Ecol 12:753–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorrough J, Moxham C (2005) Eucalypt establishment in agricultural landscapes and implications for landscape-scale restoration. Biol Cons 123:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL 1990. Isolation of DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  17. Ellstrand NC (1992) Gene flow by pollen, implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenster CB (1991) Gene flow in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae) I. Gene dispersal. Evol 45:398–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. George RJ, McFarlane DJ, Speed RJ (1995) The consequences for a changing hydrological environment formative vegetation in southwestern Australia. In: Saunders DA, Craig JL, Mattiske EM (eds) Nature conservation 4: the role of networks. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, New South Wales, pp 9–22Google Scholar
  20. Gerber S, Chabrier P, Kremer A (2003) FAMOZ, a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Mol Ecol 3:479–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibbons P, Boak M (2002) The value of paddock trees for regional conservation in an agricultural landscape. Ecol Manag Rest 3:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (2.9.3). Available from http:\\ Scholar
  23. Goulson D (2003) Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 34:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamrick JL (2004) Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. For Ecol Man 197:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Handel SN (1983) Pollination ecology, plant population structure, and gene flow. In: Real L (ed) Pollination Biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 163–211Google Scholar
  26. Hobbs RJ, Yates CJ (2000) Temperate eucalypt Woodlands in Australia, biology, conservation, management and restoration. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  27. Horskins K, Turner VB (1999) Resource use and foraging patterns of honeybees, Apis mellifera, and native insects on flowers of Eucalyptus costata. Aust J Ecol 24:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson J, Ash AJ (2001) The role of trees in enhancing soil nutrient availability for native perennial grasses in open eucalypt woodlands of north-east Queensland. Aust J Agric Res 52:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jansen DH (1986) Blurry catastrophes. Oikos 47:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jungans TG, Peters-Robinson I, Bertolucci FL, Alfenas AC (1998) The use of self-incompatibility in the production of hybrid eucalyptus seed by ‘Aracruz Celulose’ in Brazil. Genet Mol Biol 21:375–379Google Scholar
  31. Kunin WE (1997) Population biology and rarity, on the complexity of density-dependence in insect-plant interactions. In: Kunin WE, Gaston KJ (eds) The Biology of rarity, Causes and consequences of rare-common differences. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 150–173Google Scholar
  32. Levin DA, Kerster HW (1974) Gene flow in seed plants. Evol Biol 7:139–220Google Scholar
  33. Lowe AJ, Boshier D, Ward M, Bacles CFE, Navarro C (2005) Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 95:255–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lumsden LF, Bennett AF (2005) Scattered trees in rural landscapes: foraging habitat for insectivorous bats in south-eastern Australia. Biol Cons 122:205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitchener CD (1970) Superfamily Apoidea. In: Insects of Australia (ed CSIRO) pp 943–951.Melbourne University Press, ParkvilleGoogle Scholar
  37. Murawski DA, Hamrick JL (1991) The effect of the density of flowering individuals on the mating systems of nine tropical tree species. J Hered 67:167–174Google Scholar
  38. Nason JD, Hamrick JL (1997) Reproductive and genetic consequences of forest fragmentation, two case studies of neotropical canopy trees. J Hered 88:264–276Google Scholar
  39. Oliver I, Pearce S, Greenslade PJM, Britton DR (2006) Contribution of paddock trees to the conservation of terrestrial invertebrate biodiversity within grazed native pastures. Aust Ecol 31:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paton DC (1996) Overview of feral and managed honeybees in Australia, Distribution, abundance, extent of interaction with native biota, evidence of impacts and future research. Australian Nature Conservation Agency, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  41. Potts BM, Barbour RC, Hingston AB, Vaillancourt RE (2003) Genetic pollution of native eucalypt gene pools–identifying the risks. Aust J Bot 51:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reid N, Landsberg J (2000) Tree decline in agricultural landscapes: what we stand to lose. In: Hobbs RJ, Yates CJ (eds) Temperate eucalypt Woodlands in Australia, biology, conservation, management and restoration. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, New South Wales, pp 127–166Google Scholar
  43. Rousset F (1996) Equilibrium values of measures of population subdivision for stepwise mutation processes. Genetics 142:1357–1362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Saunders DA, Rebeira CP (1991) Values of corridors to avian populations in a fragmented landscape. In: Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Nature Conservation 2, The Role of Corridors. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 221–240Google Scholar
  45. Schwarz MP, Hurst PS (1997) Effects of introduced honey bees on Australia’s native bee fauna. Vic Nat 114:7–12Google Scholar
  46. Sork VL, Nason J, Campbell DR, Fernandez JF (1999) Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. TREE 14:219–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Stacy EA, Hamrick JL, Nason JD, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Condit R (1996) Pollen dispersal in low-density populations of three neotropical tree species. Am Nat 148:275–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Steane DA, Vaillancourt RE, Russell J, Powell W, Marshall D, Potts BM (2001) Development and characterisation of microsatellite loci in Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae). Sil Genet 50:89–91Google Scholar
  49. Wallace KJ (1998) Dongolocking Pilot Planning Project for Remnant Vegetation, Final Report (Phase 1). Department of Conservation and Land Management, PerthGoogle Scholar
  50. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W (2002) Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest, an example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proc Nat Acad Sci 99:2038–2042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wright S (1951) The general structure of populations Ann Eugenics 15:323–354Google Scholar
  52. Young A, Boyle T, Brown AHD (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Tree 11:413–418Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret Byrne
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carole P. Elliott
    • 1
  • Colin J. Yates
    • 1
  • David J. Coates
    • 1
  1. 1.Science Division, Department of Environment and ConservationBentley Delivery CentreBentleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations