Conservation Genetics

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 85–95

Genetic consequences of past climate and human impact on eastern Mediterranean Cedrus libani forests. Implications for their conservation

  • B. Fady
  • F. Lefèvre
  • G. G. Vendramin
  • A. Ambert
  • C. Régnier
  • M. Bariteau
Research Article


This study demonstrates the impact of natural factors and human activities on biodiversity at gene level on a keystone Mediterranean forest ecosystem species. We monitored the within and among population gene diversity of Cedrus libani, a forest tree species of the Eastern Mediterranean mountains. We used paternally inherited chloroplast microsatellites (57 haplotypes) and bi-parentally inherited isozymes (12 loci) to estimate allelic richness, heterozygosity, and differentiation in 18 natural and 1 planted populations from Turkey and Lebanon. We showed that there is a phylogeographic structure in C. libani, and that forests from Lebanon and Turkey constitute two genetically isolated groups which probably arose from distinct refugia after the last Quaternary glacial cycle. We found extensive gene flow and relatively low differentiation in Turkey, as well as little evidence of genetic drift within populations. However, one population we analyzed, which was planted more than 20 centuries ago, and is isolated from core populations in Turkey, demonstrated extremely low genetic diversity and deserves high conservation priority. In contrast, we found low gene flow, high differentiation and severe cases of genetic drift in Lebanon. As forests there are the remnants of millennia-long extensive deforestation, all deserve high conservation priority.


Chloroplast microsatellite Gene flow Genetic drift Habitat fragmentation Isozyme 


  1. Alptekin CU, Bariteau M, Fabre JP (1997) Le cèdre de Turquie : aire naturelle, insectes ravageurs, perspectives d’utilisation pour les reboisements en France. Rev Forestière Fr 49(1):19–31Google Scholar
  2. Austerlitz F, Mariette S, Machon N, Gouyon P-H, Godelle B (2000) Effects of colonization processes on genetic diversity: differences between annual plants and tree species. Genetics 154:1309–1321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bou Dagher-Kharrat M (2001) Caractérisation du génome et structuration géographique de la diversité génétique du genre Cedrus. Doctoral Thesis, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  4. Boydak M (2003) Regeneration of Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) on karstic lands in Turkey. For Ecol Manage 178:231–243Google Scholar
  5. Davis PH (1965) Flora of Turkey and East Eagean islands, vol 1. University Press, Edinburgh, pp 71–72Google Scholar
  6. El Mousadik A, Petit RJ (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree (Argania spinosa L Skeels) endemic of Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fady B (2005) Is there really more biodiversity in Mediterranean forest ecosystems? Taxon 54(4):905–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fady B, Conkle MT (1992) Segregation and linkage of allozymes in seed tissues of the hybrid Greek fir Abies borisii regis Mattfeld. Silvae Genet 41(4/5):273–278Google Scholar
  9. Fady B, Lefèvre F, Reynaud M, Vendramin GG, Bou Dagher-Kharrat M, Anzidei M, Pastorelli R, Savouré A, Bariteau M (2003) Gene flow among different taxonomic units: evidence from nuclear and cytoplasmic markers in Cedrus plantation forests. Theor Appl Genet 107(6):1132–1138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fallour D, Fady B, Lefèvre F (2001) Evidence of variation in segregation patterns within a Cedrus population. J Hered 92(3):260–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greuter W, Burdet HM, Long G (1984) Med-checklist 1. Conservatoire et Jardin Botanique de la ville de Genève. Genève, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Sherman-Broyles SL (1992) Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New For 6:95–124Google Scholar
  13. Hewitt G (2000) The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kayihan GC (2000). The genetic structure of Cedrus libani A. Rich populations determined by DNA markers. Masters thesis, Middle East Technical University, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  15. Ladjal M, Huc R, Ducrey M (2005) Drought effects on hydraulic conductivity and xylem vulnerability to embolism in diverse species and provenances of Mediterranean cedars. Tree Physiol 25(9):1109–1117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Le Corre V, Kremer A (2003) Genetic variability at neutral markers, quantitative trait loci and trait in a subdivided population under selection. Genetics 164:1205–1219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Luikart G, Allendorf FW, Cornuet JM, Sherwin WB (1998) Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. J Hered 89(3):238–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70: 3321–3323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Petit RJ, Duminil J, Fineschi S, Hampe A, Salvini D, Vendramin GG (2005) Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Mol Ecol 14(3):689–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pons O, Petit RJ (1996) Measuring and testing genetic differentiation with ordered and unordered alleles. Genetics 144:1237–1245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Provan J, Soranzo N, Wilson NJ, Goldstein DB, Powell W (1999) A low mutation rate for chloroplast microsatellites. Genetics 153:943–947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Quézel P, Médail F (2003) Ecologie et biogéographie des forêts du bassin méditerranéen. Elsevier, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Rajora OP, Rahman MH, Buchert GP, Dancik BP (2000) Microsatellite DNA analysis of genetic effects of harvesting in old-growth eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) in Ontario, Canada. Mol Ecol 9:339–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Alia R, Gil L (2004) Increased selfing and correlated paternity in a small population of a predominantly outcrossing conifer, Pinus sylvestris. Mol Ecol 13:2567–2577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rogers SO, Kaya Z (2006). DNA from ancient cedar wood from King Midas Tomb, Turkey, and Al-Aksa Mosque, Israel. Silvae Genet 55(2):54–62Google Scholar
  27. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4(4):406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Scaltsoyiannes A (1999) Allozyme differentiation and phylogeny of cedar species. Silvae Genet 48(2):61–68Google Scholar
  29. Talhouk SN, Zurayk R, Khuri S (2001) Conservation of coniferous forests of Lebanon: past, present and future prospects. Oryx 35(3):206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11(10):413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zeist W van, Woldring H, Stapert D (1975) Late quaternary vegetation and climate of southwestern Turkey. Palaeohistoria 17:53–144Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Fady
    • 1
  • F. Lefèvre
    • 1
  • G. G. Vendramin
    • 2
  • A. Ambert
    • 1
  • C. Régnier
    • 1
  • M. Bariteau
    • 1
  1. 1.INRA—UR629—Unité des Recherches Forestières MéditerranéennesAvignon Cedex 9France
  2. 2.CNR—Istituto di Genetica VegetaleSesto Fiorentino (Firenze)Italy

Personalised recommendations