Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 1483–1485 | Cite as

Taxonomic status and conservation strategy of the endangered red wolf: a response to Kyle et al. (2006)

  • D. L. Murray
  • L. P. Waits
Short Communication

Kyle et al. (2006) evaluated hypotheses related to the origin and taxonomic status of eastern wolves (Canis lycaon) and suggested that C. lycaon is conspecific with C. rufus. They maintain that the C. lycaon/C. rufus taxon likely was endemic to North America even prior to colonization by C. lupus. We consider that the putative origin of C. lycaon proposed by Kyle et al. (2006) is plausible, as is their suggestion that C. lycaon and C. rufus are closely related and possibly conspecific. However, their conclusions regarding ongoing C. rufus restoration efforts in the U.S. are problematic from the perspective of conservation and management for this endangered species.

Kyle et al. (2006) imply that management efforts reducing hybridization between C. rufus and C. latrans for the experimental endangered C. rufus population in eastern North Carolina (see Stoskopf et al. 2005) are “likely not practical, or desirable”. Their argument centers on the premise that C. rufusdoes not deserve...

Keywords

Canis lupus Canis lycaon Canis rufus Conservation Hybridization Wolves 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to the Red Wolf Recovery Implementation Team for comments on a previous draft.

References

  1. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P et al (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Geffen E, Anderson MJ, Wayne RK (2004) Climate and habitat barriers to dispersal in the highly mobile grey wolf. Mol Ecol 13:2481–2490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Fredrickson RJ, Hedrick PW (2006) Dynamics of hybridization and introgression in red wolves and coyotes. Conserv Biol 20:1272–1283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jenks SM, Wayne RK (1992) Problems and policy for species threatened by hybridization: the red wolf as a case study. In: McCullough DR, Barrett RH (eds) Wildlife 2001: populations. Elsevier Science Publ, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Kimura M (1962) On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47:713–719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kyle CJ, Johnson AR, Patterson BR et al (2006) Genetic nature of eastern wolves: past, present, and future. Conserv Gen 7:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moore GC, Parker GR (1992) Colonization by the eastern coyote (Canis latrans). In: Boer AH (ed) Ecology and management of the eastern coyote. University of New Brunswick, FredericktonGoogle Scholar
  9. Nowak RM (2002) The original status of wolves in eastern North America. Southeastern Nat 1:95–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nowak RM (2003) Wolf evolution and taxonomy. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Pilot M, Jedrzejewski W, Branicki W et al (2006) Ecological factors influence population genetic structure of European grey wolves. Molecular Ecology 15:4533–4553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Phillips MK, Henry G, Kelly BT (2003) Restoration of the red wolf. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Roy MS, Geffen E, Smith D et al (1996) Molecular genetics of pre-1940 red wolves. Conserv Biol 10:1413–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sacks BN, Mitchell BR, Williams CL, Ernest HB (2004) Coyote movements and social structure along a cryptic population genetic subdivision. Mol Ecol 14:1241–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sillero-Zubiri C, Hoffmann M, MacDonald DW (2004) (eds) Canids: foxes, wolves and dogs. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  16. Storfer A (1999) Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited. Biol Conserv 87:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stoskopf MK, Beck K, Fazio B et al (2005) Implementing recovery of the red wolf-integrating research scientists and managers. Wild Soc Bull 33:1145–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Swanson BJ, Fuhrmann RT, Crabtree RL (2005) Elevational isolation of red fox populations in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Conserv Genet 6: 123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Templeton AR (1989) The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. In: Otto D, Endler JA (eds) Speciation and its consequances. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  20. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2006) Threatened and endangered species system (TESS). URL: http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/StartTESS.do (as of 30 June 2006)Google Scholar
  21. Wayne RK, Brown DM (2001) Hybridization and conservation of carnivores. In: Gittleman JL, Funk SM, Macdonald D, Wayne RK (eds) Carnivore conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Wayne RK, Jenks SM (1991) Mitochondrial DNA analysis implying extensive hybridization of the endangered red wolf Canis rufus. Nature 351:565–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson PJ, Grewal S, Lawford ID et al (2000) DNA profiles of the eastern Canadian wolf and the red wolf provide evidence for a common evolutionary history independent of the gray wolf. Can J Zool 78:2156–2166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds) (2005) Mammal species of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  2. 2.Department of Fish and Wildlife ResourcesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations