Conservation Genetics

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 629–639 | Cite as

Genetic variation in time and space: the use of herbarium specimens to reconstruct patterns of genetic variation in the endangered orchid Anacamptis palustris

  • Salvatore CozzolinoEmail author
  • Donata Cafasso
  • Giuseppe Pellegrino
  • Aldo Musacchio
  • Alex Widmer
Original Paper


Habitat alteration, fragmentation and destruction as a consequence of human impact are a global phenomenon. Here we document changes in genetic variation in the marsh orchid Anacamptis palustris as a consequence of such habitat changes. We examined historical specimens that were collected during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, prior to the most recent massive habitat changes affecting this species. Sequences of a hypervariable region in the plastid DNA, located in the tRNALEU intron, from herbarium vouchers were compared with those from a near-exhaustive survey of the extant A. palustris populations on the Italian peninsula. It was found that private haplotypes and alleles found in small, extant populations were once widespread and more common in historic populations and that alleles, once present in historic populations, have gone extinct. In addition, genetic differentiation among populations has increased over time and haplotype frequencies significantly differ among historic and extant populations. These results document that human induced habitat changes have reduced genetic diversity and increased the importance of random genetic drift in this species. It is concluded that the analysis of herbarium specimens may provide important insights into changes of genetic diversity over time and may be critical for correct inference of the evolutionary history of rare and endangered species.


Anacamptis palustris Plastid DNA Herbarium specimens Historic haplotype diversity Temporal variation 



The authors thank the herbarium institutions (NAP, FI, ROMA, TO, Z/ZT) for providing access to their historic collections and for permitting sampling of specimens. In particular we thank the herbarium curators, namely M. Baltisberger, P. Cuccuini, L. Guglielmone, A. Millozza, and A. Santangelo for their invaluable help in specimen identification, label translation, and sample shipment. The authors also thank three anonymous reviewers for their comment that contributed to improve the MS. The present study was supported by the PRIN program of the Italian Ministry of the University and Scientific research and by a Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) grant to AW.


  1. Arditti J, Ghani AKA (2000) Tansley review No. 110—numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications. New Phytol 145:67–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bevilacqua P, Rossi-Doria M (1984) Lineamenti per una storia delle bonifiche in Italia dal ‘700 a oggi. Laterza, Roma-BariGoogle Scholar
  3. Cozzolino S, Cafasso D, Pellegrino G, Musacchio A, Widmer A (2003a) Fine-scale phylogeographical analysis of Mediterranean Anacamptis palustris (Orchidaceae) populations based on chloroplast minisatellite and microsatellite variation. Mol Ecol 12:2783–2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cozzolino S, Noce ME, Musacchio A, Widmer A (2003b) Variation at a chloroplast minisatellite locus reveals the signature of habitat fragmentation and genetic bottlenecks in the rare orchid Anacamptis palustris (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 90:1681–1687Google Scholar
  5. Cozzolino S, Cafasso D, Pellegrino G, Musacchio A, Widmer A (2003c) Molecular evolution of a plastid tandem repeat locus in an orchid lineage. J Mol Evol 57:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cozzolino S, Cafasso D, Pellegrino G, Musacchio A, Widmer A (2004) Hypervariable plastid locus variation and intron evolution in the Anacamptis palustris lineage. Genome 47:999–1003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  8. Drábková L, Kirschner J, Vlcek C (2002) Comparison of seven DNA extraction and amplification protocols in historical herbarium specimens of Juncaceae. Plant Mol Biol Rep 20:161–175Google Scholar
  9. Ellegren H (1991) DNA typing of museum birds. Nature 354:113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellegren H (2000) Heterogeneous mutation processes in human microsatellite DNA sequences. Nat Genet 24:400–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics OnlineGoogle Scholar
  13. Fay M, Cowan RS (2001) Plastid microsatellites in Cypripedium calceolus (Orchidaceae): genetic fingerprints from herbarium specimens. Lindleyana 16:151–156Google Scholar
  14. Fréville H, Colas B, Ronfort J, Riba M, Olivieri I (1998) Predicting endemism from population structure of a widespread species: case study in Centaurea maculosa Lam. (Asteraceae). Conserv Biol 12:1269–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilbert MTP, Bandelt H, Hofreiter M, Barnes I (2005) Assessing ancient DNA studies. Trends Ecol Evol 20:541–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glenn TC, Stephan W, Braun MJ (1999) Effects of population bottleneck on whooping crane mitochondrial DNA variation. Conserv Biol 13:1097–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maunder M, Culham A, Bordeu A, Allainguillaume J, Wilkinson M (1999) Genetic diversity and pedigree for Sophora toromiro (Leguminosae): a tree extinct in the wild. Mol Ecol 8:725–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller MP (1997) Tools for population genetic analyses (TFPGA) 1.3: a windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Computer software distributed by the authorGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller CR, Waits LP (2003) The history of effective population size and genetic diversity in the Yellowstone grizzly (Ursus arctos): implications for conversation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:4334–4339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Nielsen EE, Hansen MM, Loeschcke V (1999) Genetic variation in time and space: microsatellite analysis of extinct and extant populations of Atlantic salmon. Evolution 53:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Petit RJ, El Mousadik A, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv Biol 12:844–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pichler FB, Baker GS (2000) Loss of genetic diversity in the endemic Hector’s dolphin due to fisheries-related mortality. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 267:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pons O, Petit RJ (1995) Estimation, variance and optimal sampling of gene diversity. 1. Haploid locus. Theor Appl Genet 90:462–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenbaum HC, Egan MG, Clapham PJ, Brownell RL Jr, Malik S, Brown MW, White BN, Walsh P, Desalle R (2000) Utility of North Atlantic right whale museum specimens for assessing changes in genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 14:1837–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roy MS, Girman DJ, Taylor AC, Wayne RK (1994) The use of museum specimens to reconstruct the genetic variability and relationships of extinct populations. Experientia 50:551–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saltonstall K (2002) Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2445–2449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Savolainen V, Cuénoud P, Spichiger R, Martinez MDP, Crèvecoeur M, Manen JF (1995) The use of herbarium specimens in DNA phylogenetics: evaluation and improvement. Plant Syst Evol 197:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schaal BA, Hayworth DA, Olsen KM, Rauscher JT, Smith WA (1998) Phylogeographic studies in plants: problems and prospects. Mol Ecol 7:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taberlet P, Bouvet J (1992) Bear conservation genetic. Nature 358:197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tessier N, Bernatchez L (1999) Stability of population structure and genetic diversity across generations assessed by microsatellites among sympatric populations of landlocked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Mol Ecol 8:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomas WK, Pääbo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1990) Spatial and temporal continuity of kangaroo rat populations shown by sequencing mitochondrial DNA from museum specimens. J Mol Evol 31:101–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Towne B, Devor EJ (1990) Effect of storage time and temperature on DNA extracted from whole blood samples. Hum Biol 62:301–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Waples RB (1989) Temporal variation in allele frequencies: testing the right hypothesis. Evolution 43:1236–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvatore Cozzolino
    • 1
    Email author
  • Donata Cafasso
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Pellegrino
    • 2
  • Aldo Musacchio
    • 2
  • Alex Widmer
    • 3
  1. 1.Dipartimento delle Scienze BiologicheUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di EcologiaUniversità della CalabriaCosenzaItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Integrative Biology, Plant Ecological GeneticsETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations