Evaluation of ancestral inbreeding coefficients: Ballou’s formula versus gene dropping
- 209 Downloads
Estimation of the purging of detrimental effects through inbreeding and selection is an important issue in conservation genetics opening new perspectives for the management of small populations. In 1997 Ballou proposed the ancestral inbreeding coefficient, which is calculated recursively via pedigree inbreeding coefficients, as a tool for evaluating the purging of deleterious alleles in zoo populations. The formula of Ballou assumes independence of inbreeding and ancestral inbreeding coefficients at any stage of the recursion. This study investigates the consequences of this inaccuracy on the estimation of true ancestral inbreeding, i.e. the proportion of alleles within a genome that has undergone inbreeding in the past. As an alternative we propose the estimation of ancestral inbreeding by the method of gene dropping. The methods are compared by stochastic simulation for various models with respect to mode of inheritance (neutral, detrimental and lethal alleles) and different settings for population size and initial allele frequencies. In all scenarios the proportion of alleles within a genome that has undergone inbreeding in the past was overestimated by Ballou’s formula. The overestimation was more pronounced in smaller populations but was not affected by genetic model or initial allele frequency. In contrast, the ancestral inbreeding coefficient calculated by gene dropping provided a robust estimate of ancestral inbreeding in most models and settings. A marginal overestimation was observed only in models with lethal alleles. Therefore, we recommend applying the gene dropping approach to estimate ancestral inbreeding coefficients.
KeywordsAncestral inbreeding Inbreeding depression Genetic load Purging Stochastic simulations
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We are grateful to B. Tier for providing the algorithm to compute pedigree inbreeding coefficients and D. Tupajic for helping with the figure preparation. This research project was financial supported by the Royal Thai government.
- Baumung R, Sölkner J (2003) Pedigree and marker information requirements to monitor genetic variability. Genet Sel Evo 35:369–383Google Scholar
- Edwards AWF (1968) Simulation studies of genealogies. Heredity 23:628. Abstract of a presented paperGoogle Scholar
- Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
- Templeton AR, Read B (1983) The elimination of inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke’s gazelle. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas L (eds) Genetics and conservation. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California, pp241–261Google Scholar
- Tier B (1997) Useful algorithms for the genetic evaluation of livestock. PhD thesis, University of New England, Armidale, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Wright S (1977) Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol. 3. Experimental results and evolutionary deductions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar