Conservation Genetics

, 7:273

Genetic nature of eastern wolves: Past, present and future

  • C.J. Kyle
  • A.R. Johnson
  • B.R. Patterson
  • P.J. Wilson
  • K. Shami
  • S.K. Grewal
  • B.N. White
Article

Abstract

Eastern North American wolves have long been recognized as morphologically distinct from both coyotes and gray wolves. This has led to questions regarding their origins and taxonomic status. Eastern wolves are mainly viewed as: (1) a smaller subspecies of gray wolf (Canis lupus lycaon), potentially the result of historical hybridization between gray wolves (C. lupus) and red wolves (C. rufus), (2) a hybrid, the result of gray wolf (C. lupus) and coyote (C. latrans) interbreeding, or (3) a distinct species, C. lycaon, closely related to the red wolf (C. rufus). Although debate persists, recent molecular studies suggest that the eastern wolf is not a gray wolf subspecies, nor the result of gray wolf/coyote hybridization. Eastern wolves were more likely a distinct species, C. lycaon, prior to the eastward spread of coyotes in the late 1800s. However, contemporary interbreeding exits between C. lycaon to both C. lupus and C. latrans over much of its present range complicating its present taxonomic characterization. While hybridization may be reducing the taxonomic distinctiveness of C. lycaon, it should not necessarily be viewed as negative influence. Hybridization may be enhancing the adaptive potential of eastern wolves, allowing them to more effectively exploit available resources in rapidly changing environments.

Key words

Canis latrans Canis lupus Canis lycaon eastern wolf hybridization 

References

  1. Adams JR, Kelly BT, Waits LP (2003). Using fecal DNA sampling and GIS to monitor hybridization between red wolves (Canis rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans). Mol. Ecol., 12, 2175–2186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arjo WM, Pletcher DH (1999). Behavioral responses of coyotes to wolf recolonization in northwestern Montana. Can. J. Zool., 77, 1919–1927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates DN (1958) History of the Timber Wolf and Coyote in Ontario, Ontario Department of Lands and Parks, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekoff M, Wells MC (1986). Social ecology and behavior of coyotes. Adv. Stud. Behav., 16:251–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertorelle G, Excoffier L (1998). Inferring admixture proportions from molecular data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1298–1311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boitani L (2003) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. In: Chapter 3, Wolf Conservation and Recovery (eds. Mech LD, Boitani L), pp. 317–340. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewster WG, Fritts SH (1995) Taxonomy and genetics of the gray wolf in western North America: a review. In: Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World (eds. Carbyn LN et al.), pp. 353–374. Canadian Circumpolar Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  8. Carbyn LN (1982). Coyote population fluctuations and spatial distribution in relation to wolf territories in Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba. Can. Field Nat. 96:176–183Google Scholar
  9. Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000). Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:290–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Forbes GJ, Theberge JB (1992) Implications of scavenging on moose by wolves in Algonquin Park, Ontario. Alces, 28, 235–241Google Scholar
  11. Forbes GJ, Theberge JB (1995). Influences of migratory deer herd on wolf movements and mortality in and near Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario. In: Carbyn L.N., Fritts S.H., Seip D.R. (eds). Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World. Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pp. 303–313Google Scholar
  12. Forbes SH, Boyd DK (1997). Genetic structure and migration in native and reintroduced Rocky Mountain wolf populations. Conserv. Biol. 11:1226–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franzmann AW, Schwartz C (1997). Ecology and Management of the North American moose. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia-Moreno J, Matocq MD, Roy MS, Geffen E, Wayne RK (1996). Relationships and genetic purity of the endangered Mexican wolf based on analysis of microsatellite loci. Conserv. Biol. 10:376–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geffen E, Anderson MJ, Wayne RK (2004). Climate and habitat barriers to dispersal in the highly mobile gray wolf. Mol. Ecol. 13:2481–2490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham RW, Lundelius EL Jr (1994). FAUNMAP: A Database Documenting Late Quaternary Distributions of Mammal Species in the United States. Illinois State Museum, Springfield IL pp. 690Google Scholar
  17. Grewal SR (2001) A Genetic Analysis of the Eastern Timber Wolf. M.Sc. Thesis, McMaster University, 173ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Grewal SR, Wilson PJ, Kung TK, Shami K, Theberge MT, Theberge JB, White BN (2004). A genetic assessment of the eastern wolf, Canis lycaon in Algonquin Park. J. Mammal., 85:625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall RE, Kelson KR (1959). The Mammals of North America, Vol. 2. The Ronald Press Company, NYGoogle Scholar
  20. Hedrick PW, Miller PS, Geffen E, and Wayne RK (1997). Genetic evaluation of three captive Mexican wolf lineages. Zool. Biol. 16:47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hedrick PW, Lee RN, Garrigan D (2002). Major histocompatibility complex variation in red wolves: evidence for common ancestry with coyotes and balancing selection. Mol. Ecol. 11:1905–1913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolenosky GB (1971). Hybridization between wolf and coyote. J. Mammal., 52:446–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolenosky GB, Standfield R (1975). Morphological and ecological variation among gray wolves (Canis lupus) of Ontario, Canada. In: Fox M.W. (eds). The Wild Canids: Their Systematics, Behavioural Ecology and Evolution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, N.Y, pp. 62–72Google Scholar
  24. Lehman N, Eisenhawer A, Hansen K, Mech LD, Peterson RO, Gogan PJ, Wayne RK (1991). Introgression of coyote mitochondrial DNA genotype frequencies: estimation of the effective number of alleles. Evolution 45:104–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lehman N, Clarkson P, Mech DL, Meier TJ, Wayne RK (1992). A study of the genetic relationships within and among wolf packs using DNA fingerprinting and mitochondrial DNA. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leonard JA, Vila C, Wayne RK (2005). Legacy lost: genetic variability and population size of extirpated US grey wolves (Canis lupus). Mol. Ecol. 14:9–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mech LD (1966) The Wolves of Isle Royale. US National Park Service Fauna Series No. 7Google Scholar
  28. Mech LD (1970). The Wolf: The Ecology and Behaviour of an Endangered Species. The Natural History Press, Garden City, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Mech LD, Karns PD (1977) Role of the Wolf in a Deer Decline in the Superior National Forest. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NC-148, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, 23ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Mech LD, Federoff NE (2002). Alpha (1) – antitrypsin polymorphism and systematics of eastern North American wolves. Can. J. Zool., 80:961–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller GS (1912) The Names of the Large Wolves of Northern and Western North America. Smithsonian Miscellaneous CollectionGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller CR, Adams JR, Waits LP (2003). Pedigree-based assignment tests for reversing coyote (Canis latrans) introgression into the wild Red wolf (Canis rufus) population. Mol. Ecol., 12:3287–3301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore GC, Parker GR (1992). Colonization by the eastern coyote (Canis latrans). In: Boer AH (eds). Ecology and Management of the Eastern Coyote. Wildlife Research Unit, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, pp. 23–37Google Scholar
  34. Moritz C (1994). Defining “Evolutionarily Significant Units” for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol., 9:373–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moritz C (1999). Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas 130:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moritz C (2002). Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary process that sustains it. Syst. Biol. 51:238– 254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nowak RM (1979) North American Quartenary Canis. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Monograph, no. 6Google Scholar
  38. Nowak RM (1983) A perspective on the taxonomy of wolves in North America. In: Wolves in Canada and Alaska (ed. Carbyn LN), pp. 10–19. Can. Wildl. Serv. Rept. Ser., no. 45Google Scholar
  39. Nowak RM (1992). The red wolf is not a hybrid. Conserv. Biol., 6:593–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nowak RM (1995) Another look at wolf taxonomy. In: Carbyn LN, Fritts SH and Seip DR (eds). Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World: Proceedings of the Second North American Symposium of Wolves. Canadian Circumpolar Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 375–398Google Scholar
  41. Nowak RM (2002). The original status of wolves in eastern North America. Southeastern Nat., 1:95–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nowak RM (2003). Wolf evolution and taxonomy. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds). Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 239–258Google Scholar
  43. Parker G (1995). Eastern Coyote: The Story of its Success. Nimbus Publishing Limited, Halifax, Nova ScotiaGoogle Scholar
  44. Peterson RL (1955). North American Moose. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  45. Peterson RL (1966). The Mammals of Eastern Canada. Oxford University Press, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  46. Pilgrim KL, Boyd DK, Forbes SH (1998). Testing for wolf–coyote hybridization in the Rocky Mountains using mitochondrial DNA. J. Wildl. Manag. 62:683–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pockock RL (1935). The races of Canis lupus. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 3:647–686Google Scholar
  48. Quinn NWS (2004). The pre-settlement hardwood forests and wildlife of Algonquin Provincial park: a synthesis of historic evidence and recent research. Forest. Chron. 80:705–717Google Scholar
  49. Reich DE, Wayne RK, and Goldstein DB (1999). Genetic evidence for a recent origin by hybridization of red wolves. Mol. Ecol. 8:139–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Roy MS, Geffen E, Smith D, Ostrander EA, and Wayne RK (1994). Patterns of differentiation and hybridization in North American Wolflike Canids, revealed by analysis of microsatellite loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:553–570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Roy MS, Geffen E, Smith D, and Wayne RK (1996). Molecular genetics of pre-1940 red wolves. Conserv. Biol. 10:1413–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmitz OJ, and Kolenosky GB (1985). Wolves and coyotes in Ontario: morphological relationships and origins. Can. J. Zool. 63:1130–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shami K (2002) Evaluating the Change in Distribution of the Eastern Timber Wolf (Canis lycaon) using the Y-Chromosome. M.Sc. Thesis, McMaster University, 73ppGoogle Scholar
  54. Sharma DK, Maldonado JE, Jhala YV, and Fleischer RC (2004). Ancient wolf lineages in India. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.) 271:S1–S4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Silver H and Silver WT (1969). Growth and behaviour of the coyote-like canid of Northern New England with observations on canid hybrids. Wildlife Monogr. 17:1–41Google Scholar
  56. Soltis PS, and Gitzendanner MA (1999). Molecular systematics and the conservation of rare species. Conserv. Biol. 13:471–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Theberge JB (1991). Ecological classifications, status, and management of the Gray Wolf, Canis lupus, in Canada. Can. Field Nat. 105:459–463Google Scholar
  58. Thurber JM, and Peterson RO (1991). Changes in body size associated with range expansion in the coyote (Canis latrans). J. Mammal. 72:750–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wayne RK (1995). The problematic red wolf. Sci. Am., 273:36–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang J (2003). Maximum-likelihood estimates of admixture proportions from genetic data. Genetics 164:747–765PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Wayne RK, and Lehman N (1992). Mitochondrial DNA analysis of the eastern coyote: origins and hybridization. In: Boer AH (eds). Ecology and Management of the Eastern Coyote. Wildlife Research Unit, Fredericton, NB, pp. 9–22Google Scholar
  62. Wayne RK, Lehman N, Allard MW, and Honeycutt RL (1992). Mitochondrial DNA variability of the gray wolf: genetic consequences of population decline and habitat fragmentation. Conserv. Biol., 6:559–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wayne RK, and Vila C (2003). Molecular genetics studies of wolves. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds). Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 218–238Google Scholar
  64. Wayne RK, and Jenks SM (1991). Mitochondrial DNA analysis implying extensive hybridization of the endangered red wolf Canis rufus. Nature 351:565–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. White BN, Wilson P, Johnson AR, Grewal S, Shami K (2001) Status of the eastern wolf (Canis lycaon). In: O.M.N.R. The Eastern Wolf, A Newsletter on Wolf Studies in and around Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario. Vol. 1, Issue 1, 2003Google Scholar
  66. Wilson PJ, Grewal S, Lawford ID, Heal JNM, Gra nacki AG, Pennock D, Theberge JB, Theberge MT, Voigt DR, Waddell W, Chambers RE, Paquet PC, Goulet G, Cluff D, and White BW (2000). DNA Profiles of the eastern Canadian wolf and the red wolf provide evidence for a common evolutionary history independent of the gray wolf. Can. J. Zool., 78:2156–2166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson PJ, Grewal S, McFadden T, Chambers RC, and White BN (2003). Mitochondrial DNA extracted from eastern North American wolves killed in the 1800s is not of gray wolf origin. Can. J. Zool., 81:936–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Young SP, and Goldman EA (1944). The Wolves of North America, Part I. American Wildlife Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • C.J. Kyle
    • 1
    • 2
  • A.R. Johnson
    • 2
    • 3
  • B.R. Patterson
    • 1
  • P.J. Wilson
    • 2
  • K. Shami
    • 2
  • S.K. Grewal
    • 2
  • B.N. White
    • 2
  1. 1.Wildlife Research and Development SectionOntario Ministry of Natural Resources, Trent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  2. 2.Natural Resources DNA Profiling and Forensic Centre, Department of BiologyTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  3. 3.Department of BiologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations