Reduced genetic diversity and significant genetic differentiation after translocation: Comparison of the remnant and translocated populations of bridled nailtail wallabies (Onychogalea fraenata)
- First Online:
- 352 Downloads
Loss of genetic diversity and increased population differentiation from source populations are common problems associated with translocation programmes established from captive-bred stock or a small number of founders. The bridled nailtail wallaby is one of the most endangered macropods in Australia, having been reduced to a single remnant population in the last 100 years. A translocated population of bridled nailtail wallabies was established using animals sourced directly from the remnant population (wild-released) as well as the progeny of animals collected for a captive breeding programme (captive-bred). The aims of this study were to compare genetic diversity among released animals and their wild-born progeny to genetic diversity observed in the remnant population, and to monitor changes in genetic diversity over time as more animals were released into the population. Heterozygosity did not differ between the translocated and remnant population; however, allelic diversity was significantly reduced across all released animals and their wild-born progeny. Animals bred in captivity and their wild-born progeny were also significantly differentiated from the source population after just four generations. Wild-released animals, however, were representative of the source population and several alleles were unique to this group. Both heterozygosity and allelic diversity among translocated animals decreased over time with the additional release of captive-bred animals, as no new genetic stock was added to the population. Captive breeding programmes can provide large numbers of animals for release, but this study highlights the importance of sourcing animals directly from remnant populations in order to maintain genetic diversity and minimise genetic drift.
Keywordsbridled nailtail wallaby conservation microsatellite population genetics translocation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Goodnight KF, Queller DC, Poznansky T (1998) KINSHIP (version 1.3.1). Goodnight Software. Available at http://www.gsoftnet.us/GSoft.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. Updated from Goudet (1995)Google Scholar
- Hood GM (2003) PopTools version 2.5.9. Available at http://www.cse.csiro.au/poptoolsGoogle Scholar
- Lundie-Jenkins G (2002). Recovery Plan for the Bridled Nailtail Wallaby (Onychogalea fraenata) 1997–2001. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
- Maudet C, Miller C, Bassano B, Breitenmoser-Wursten C, Gauthier D, Obexer-Ruff G, Michallet J, Taberlet P, Luikart G (2002) Microsatellite DNA and recent statistical methods in wildlife conservation management: applications in Alpine ibex [Capra ibex (ibex)]. Mol. Ecol. 11: 421–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sigg DP (2005) Population genetics and mating system in the single remnant and translocated population of the endangered bridled nailtail wallaby, Onychogalea fraenata. Ph.D. thesis, University of Queensland, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
- Yeh FC, Yang R-C, Boyle T, Ye Z-H, Mao JX (1997) POPGENE, the User-Friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta CanadaGoogle Scholar