Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 953–968 | Cite as

Population structuring in mountain zebras (Equus zebra): The molecular consequences of divergent demographic histories

  • Yoshan Moodley
  • Eric H. Harley
Article

Abstract

The endangered mountain zebra (Equus zebra) is endemic to the semi-arid inhospitable mountainous escarpments of southern Africa. The species is divided taxonomically into two geographically separated subspecies, each with differing recent population histories. In Namibia, Hartmann’s mountain zebra (E. z. hartmannae) is common and occurs in large free-ranging populations, whereas in South Africa, prolonged hunting and habitat destruction over the last 300 years has decimated populations of the Cape mountain zebra (E. z. zebra). In this study, we investigate the consequences of these divergent demographic histories for population genetic diversity and structure. We also examine the phylogeographic relationship between the two taxonomic groups. Genetic information was obtained at 15 microsatellite loci for 291 individuals from a total of 10 populations as well as 445 bp of the mitochondrial control region sequence data from 77 individuals. Both model-based and standard analytical approaches were used to examine the data. Both types of marker returned levels of diversity and structure that were consistent with population history. Low genetic variation within individual Cape mountain zebra populations, the characteristic indicator of population fragmentation and drift, was offset by moderate variation in the entire E. z. zebra sample. This implies that higher levels of diversity still exist within the Cape mountain zebra gene pool. A management strategy that entailed the mixing of aboriginal populations is therefore advocated in order to halt the further loss of Cape mountain zebra genetic diversity. Allele frequencies in Hartmann’s mountain zebra were relatively resilient to demographic fluctuations. Due to the high incidence of mitochondrial haplotype sharing between populations, the hypothesis that Cape and Hartmann’s mountain zebra mitochondrial lineages were reciprocally monophyletic was not supported. However, the presence of private alleles at nuclear loci rendered the two subspecies genetically distinct evolutionary significant units.

Keywords

Mountain zebra population structure conservation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Research Foundation of the Republic of South Africa. The authors are indebted to Peter Lloyd, Banie Penzhorn, Peter Novellie, Pauline Lindeque, Holger Kolberg, Tom Barry, Gail Cleaver, Piet Morkel, Paul Meyer, numerous tanneries and taxidermists and the staff of the Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, South African National Parks and the Ministry of the Environment and Tourism of Namibia.

References

  1. Bandelt H-J, Forster P, Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: l 37–148Google Scholar
  2. Belkhir K (2001) Genetix 4.01, Software for population genetics. Laboratoire Génome, Populations et Interactions, University of Montpelier, Montpelier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigalke R (1952) Early history of the Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra. Linn). African Wildlife 6: 143–153Google Scholar
  4. Binns MM, Holmes NG, Holliman A, Scott AM (1995) The identification of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the horse and their use in thoroughbred parentage testing. Brit. Vet. J. 151: 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castley G, Lloyd PH, Moodley Y (2002) Cape mountain zebra, Equus zebra zebra taxon data sheet. IUCN Conservation Assessment Management Plan. Randburg, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciofi C, Beaumont MA, Swingland IR, Bruford MW (1999) Genetic divergence and units for conservation in the Komodo dragon Varanus komodoensis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 266: 2269–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coogle L, Bailey E (1997) Equine dinucleotide repeat loci LEX049–LEX063. Anim. Genet. 28: 378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coogle L, Reid R, Bailey E (1996) Equine dinucleotide repeat loci LEX015–LEX024. Anim. Genet. 27: 217–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson KJ, Belkhir K (2001) A Bayesian approach to the identification of panmictic populations and the assignment of individuals. Genet. Res. 78: 59–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eggleston-Stott ML, DelValle A, Bautista M et al. (1997) Nine equine dinucleotide repeats at microsatellite loci UCDEQ136, UCDEQ405, UCDEQ412, UCDEQ425, UCDEQ437, UCDEQ467, UCDEQ487, UCDEQ502, UCDEQ505. Anim. Genet. 28: 370–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellegren H, Johansson M, Sandberg K, Andersson L (1992) Cloning of highly polymorphic microsatellites in the horse. Anim. Genet. 23: 133–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Excoffier L, Smouse P (1994) Using allele frequencies and geographic subdivision to reconstruct gene genealogies within species. Molecular variance parsimony. Genetics 136: 343–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002). Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraser DJ, Bernatchez L (2001) Adaptive evolutionary conservation: Towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol. Ecol. 10: 2741–2752PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Groves CP, Bell CH (2004) New investigations on the taxonomy of zebras genus Equus, subgenus Hippotigris. Mammal. Biol. 69: 182–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groves CP, Ryder OA (2000) Systematics and phylogeny of the horse. In: The Genetics of the Horse (eds. Bowling AT, Ruvinsky A) CAB InternationalGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartl GB, Pucek Z (1994) Genetic depletion in the European Bison (Bison bonasus) and the significance of electrophoretic heterozygosity for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 8: 167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hedrick PW (1999) Highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53: 313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hilton-Taylor C (2000) 2000 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Hopman TJ, Han EB, Story, MR et al. (1999) Equine dinucleotide repeat loci COR001–COR020. Anim. Genet. 30: 225–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Karesh WB, Smith F, Frazier-Taylor H (1987) A remote method for obtaining skin biopsy samples. Conservation Biology 3: 261–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lazary S, Gerber H, Glatt PA, Straub R (1985) Equine leucocyte antigens in sarcoid-affected horses. Equine Vet. J. 17: 283–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lloyd PH (1984) The Cape mountain zebra 1984. African Wildlife 38: 144–149Google Scholar
  24. Marklund S, Ellegren H, Eriksson S, Sandberg K, Andersson L (1994) Parentage testing and linkage analysis in the horse using a set of highly polymorphic microsatellites. Anim. Genet. 25: 19–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Matschie P (1898) Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, 174 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Meredith D, Elser AH, Wolf B (1986) Equine leukocyte antigens: Relationships with sarcoid tumors and laminitis in two pure breeds. Immunogenetics 23: 221–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Millar JCG (1970a) Census of Cape mountain zebras: Part I. African Wildlife 24: 17–25Google Scholar
  28. Millar JCG (1970b) Census of Cape mountain zebras: Part II. African Wildlife 24: 105–114Google Scholar
  29. Moodley Y (2002) Population structuring in southern African zebras. University of Cape Town, South Africa, PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  30. Moritz C (1994) Defining “Evolutionarily Significant Units” for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 373–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muwanika VB, Nyakaana S, Siegismund HR, Arctander P (2003) Phylogeography and population structure of the common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus) inferred from variation in mitochondrial DNA sequences and microsatellite loci. Heredity 91: 361–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Novellie P, Lindeque M, Lindeque P, Lloyd PH, Koen J (2002) Status and Action Plan for the Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra). In: Moehlman PD (eds) Equids: zebras, asses and horses: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  35. Novellie P, Lloyd PH, Joubert E (1992) Mountain Zebras. In: Duncan P (ed) Zebras, Asses and Horses: An Action Plan for the Conservation of Wild Equids. IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  36. Nyakaana S, Arctander P, Siegismund HR (2002) Population structure of the African savannah elephant inferred from mitochondrial control region sequences and nuclear microsatellite loci. Heredity 89: 90–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Oakenfull EA, Lim HN, Ryder OA (2000) A survey of equid mitochondrial DNA: Implications for the evolution, genetic diversity and conservation of Equus. Conserv. Genet. 1: 341–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pesole G, Gissi C, De Chirico A, Saccone C (1999) Nucleotide substitution rate of mammalian mitochondrial genomes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 48: 427–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rau RE (2002) Are the two mountain zebra subspecies distinguishable? Mainly About Anim. 54: 20–21Google Scholar
  41. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86: 248–249Google Scholar
  42. Rice WR (1989) Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rogers AR, Harpending H (1992) Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pair-wise genetic differences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9: 552–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rozas J, Rozas R (1999) DNAsp version 3: An integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15: 174–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning - A Laboratory Manual 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin version 2.000: Software for population genetic data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  47. Skinner JD, Smithers RHN (1990) The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion. University of PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  48. Spencer CC, Neigel JE, Leberg PL (2000) Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1517–1528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Strimmer K, von Haeseler A (1996) Quartet puzzling: A quartet maximum likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 964–969Google Scholar
  50. Swinburne JE, Marti E, Breen M, Binns MM (1997) Characterisation of twelve new horse microsatellite loci: AHT 12 – AHT 23. Anim. Genet. 28: 453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Tozaki T, Kakoi H, Mashima S (2000) The isolation and characterization of 18 equine microsatellite loci, TKY272-TKY289. Anim. Genet. 31: 149–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Uphyrkina O, Johnson WE, Quigley H, et al. (2001) Phylogenetics, genome diversity and origin of modern leopard, Panthera pardus. Mol. Ecol. 10: 2617–2633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. van Haeringen WA, van de Goor LHP, van der Hout N, Lenstra A (1998) Characterization of 24 microsatellite loci. Anim. Genet. 29: 153–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Woods DH (1960) Mountain zebras. Journal of the Mountain Club of South Africa 63: 4–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wildlife Genetics UnitUniversity of Cape TownCape TownRepublic of South Africa
  2. 2.School of Biosciences, Main BuildingCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations