The endangered Sonoran topminnow: Examination of species and ESUs using three mtDNA genes
- 97 Downloads
There has been controversy over the species status of Sonoran topminnows and debate about the presence of ESUs in the Gila topminnow. From examination of sequence variation at 2626 base pairs over three mtDNA genes, we found a 29 (1.1%) nucleotide genetic difference between Gila and Yaqui topminnows. This provides strong support that these two taxa are separate species, Poeciliopsis occidentalis (Gila topminnow) and P. sonoriensis (Yaqui topminnow) and have been separated for approximately one million years. All the Gila topminnows within Arizona have the same sequence for the three mtDNA genes, that is, there is not reciprocal monophyly for mtDNA sequence data for the two previously designated ESUs. However, evidence of the unique habitat for Monkey Spring, its long-term isolation from other Gila topminnow habitats, and the presence of unique fish and invertebrate taxa in Monkey Spring support the designation of the Monkey Spring topminnows as an ESU. Finally, theoretical considerations using molecular data and estimates of heterozygosity and genetic distance for nuclear genes between populations of the Gila topminnow show that the lack of mtDNA variation is not inconsistent with the level and pattern of nuclear genetic variation observed.
Key words:ESU effective population size genetic distance mtDNA Poeciliopsis
We appreciate the financial support from the Arizona Heritage Fund and the Ullman Professorship for this research. We appreciate comments on an earlier version of this manuscript from two anonymous reviewers.
- Hall T (1991–2004) BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor. Isis Pharmaceuticals, IncGoogle Scholar
- Hedrick PW (2005) Genetics of Populations, 3rd Edition. Jones and Bartlett, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Hurt CR, Farzin M, Hedrick PW (2005) Premating, not postmating, barriers drive genetic dynamics in experimental hybrid populations of the endangered sonaran topminnow. Genetics, in pressGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S (1996) PHYLTEST: Phylogenetic hypothesis testing software. Version 2.0. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M (2001) MEGA2: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software. Arizona State University, Tempe, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
- Melton MA (1960) Origin of the drainage of southeastern Arizona. AZ. Geol. Soc. Digest 3:113–122Google Scholar
- Minckley WL (1973) Keys to native and introduced fishes of Arizona. J. Ariz. Acad. Sci. 6:183–188Google Scholar
- Minckley WL (1999) Ecological review and management recommendation for recovery of the endangered Gila topminnow. Great Basin Natur. 59:230–244Google Scholar
- Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Waples RS (1995) Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 17:8–27Google Scholar