Conservation Genetics

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 587–600 | Cite as

Genetic differentiation and intraspecific structure of Eastern Tropical Pacific spotted dolphins, Stenella  attenuata, revealed by DNA analyses

  • Sergio Escorza-Treviño
  • Frederick I. Archer
  • Maria Rosales
  • Aimee Lang
  • Andrew E. Dizon


Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region sequences and microsatellite loci length polymorphisms were used to investigate genetic differentiation in spotted dolphins (Stenella attenuata) in the Eastern Tropical Pacific and to examine the intraspecific structure of the coastal subspecies (Stenella  attenuata  graffmani). One-hundred and thirty-five animals from several coastal areas and 90 offshore animals were sequenced for 455 bp of the mitochondrial control region, resulting in 112 mtDNA haplotypes. Phylogenetic analyses and the existence of shared haplotypes between the two subspecies suggest recent and/or current gene flow. Analyses using χ2, F ST (based on haplotype frequencies) and ΦST values (based on frequencies and genetic distances between haplotypes) yielded statistically significant separation (randomized permutation values P<0.05) among four different coastal populations and between all but one of these and the offshore subspecies (overall F ST=0.0691). Ninety-one coastal animals from these four geographic populations and 50 offshore animals were genotyped for seven nuclear microsatellite loci. Analysis using F ST values (based on allelic frequencies) yielded statistically significant separation between most coastal populations and offshore animals, although no coastal populations were distinguished. These results argue for the existence of some genetic isolation between offshore and inshore populations and among some inshore populations, suggesting that these should be treated as separate units for management purposes.


microsatellites mtDNA population structure spotted dolphin stocks 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



We would like to thank Sarah Mesnick and Rick LeDuc for their spirited and helpful discussions and four anonymous reviewers for their comments, which greatly improved the manuscript. Thanks to Carrie LeDuc for her technical help. We are also grateful to those who provided samples for this study.


  1. AIDCP (1998) Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Program. International agreement signed May 21, 1998 in Washington, DC. Text of agreement available at 202001%20ENG.pdf
  2. Amos B, Hoelzel AR (1991) Long-term preservation of whale skin for DNA analysis. In: Hoelzel AR (eds) The genetic ecology of whales and dolphins. Special publication No. 13 of the IWC. Cambridge, England, pp. 99–103Google Scholar
  3. Anderson S, Bankier AT, Barrell BG et al. (1981) Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial DNA. Nature 290: 457–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bérubé M, Palsbøll P (1996) Identification of sex in cetaceans by multiplexing with three ZFX and ZFY specific primers. Molecular Ecology 5: 283–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brassel KE, Reif D (1979) A procedure to generate Thiessen polygons. Geographical Analysis 11: 289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cockerham CC, Weir BS (1993) Estimation of gene flow from F-statistics. Evolution 47: 855–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dizon AE, Perrin WF, Akin PA (1994) Stocks of dolphins (Stenella spp. and Delphinus delphis) in the Eastern Tropical Pacific: A phylogeographic classification. NOAA Technical Report NMFS, 119 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Dizon AE, Taylor BL, O’Corry-Crowe GM (1995) Why statistical power is necessary to link analysis of molecular variation to decisions about population structure. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17: 288–294Google Scholar
  9. Douglas ME, Schnell GD, Hough DJ (1984) Differentiation Between Inshore and Offshore Spotted Dolphins in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean. Journal of Mammology 65: 375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Escorza-Treviño S, Dizon AE (2000) Phylogeography, intraspecific structure, and sex-biased dispersal of Dall’s porpoise, Phocoenoides dalli, revealed by mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA analyses. Molecular Ecology 9: 1049—1060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Galver LM (2002) The molecular ecology of spinner dolphins, stenella longirostris: genetic diversity and population structure. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  13. Gosliner ML (1999) The tuna-dolphin controversy. In: Twiss JR Jr. and Reeves RR (eds) Conservation and Management of Marine Mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 120–155Google Scholar
  14. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from
  15. Hayano A, Yoshioka M, Tanaka M, Amano M (2004) Population differentiation in the Pacific white-sided dolphin Lagenorhynchus obliquidens inferred from mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite analyses. Zoological Science 21: 989–999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoelzel AR, Goldsworthy SD, Fleischer RC (2002) Population genetics. In: Hoelzel AR (eds) Marine Mammal Biology: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, England, pp. 325–352Google Scholar
  17. Hoelzel AR, Potter CW, Best PB (1998) Genetic differentiation between parapatric ‘nearshore’ and ‘offshore’ populations of the bottlenose dolphin. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265: 1177–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M (2001) MEGA2: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Natoli A, Peddemors VM, Hoelzel R (2004) Population structure and speciation in the genus Tursiops based on microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 363–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Nielsen R, Wakeley JW (2001) Distinguishing Migration from Isolation: a Markov Chain Montecarlo Approach. Genetics 158: 885–896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Perrin WF, Scott MD, Walker GJ, Cass VL (1985) Review of geographical stocks of tropical dolphins (Stenella spp. and Delphinus delphis) in the eastern Pacific. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 28, 28 p.Google Scholar
  24. Perrin WF, Schnell GD, Hough DJ, Gilpatrick JW Jr, Kashiwada JV (1994) Reexamination of geographic variation in cranial morphology of the pantropical spotted dolphin, Stenella attenuata, in the eastern Pacific. Fisheries Bulletin 92: 324–346Google Scholar
  25. Peterman RM (1990) Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47: 2–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249Google Scholar
  27. Rice DW (1998) Marine mammals of the world. Systematics and distribution. Special publication No. 4 of the Society for Marine Mammology, Lawrence, Kansas, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Roff DA, Bentzen P (1989) The statistical analysis of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms: χ2 and the problem of small samples. Molecular Biology and Evolution 6: 539–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosel PE, Dizon AE, Heyning JE (1994) Genetic analysis of sympatric morphotypes of common dolphins (genus Delphinus). Marine Biology 119: 159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd. Ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN ver. 2.000: A software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  33. Schnell GD, Douglas ME, Hough DJ (1982) Geographic Variation in Morphology of Spotted and Spinner Dolphins (Stenella  attenuata and S. longirostris) from the Eastern Tropical Pacific. SWFSC Admin Report LJ-82–15C. 213 p.Google Scholar
  34. Schnell GD, Douglas ME, Hough DJ (1986) Geographic Patterns of Variation in Offshore Spotted Dolphins (Stenella Attenuata) of the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean. Marine Mammal Science 2: 186–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Swofford P (1993) PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor BL (1997) Defining “Population” to meet management objectives for Marine Mammals. In: Dizon AE, Chivers SJ, Perrin WF (eds) Molecular Genetics of Marine Mammals. (Special Publication Number 3.) Society for Marine Mammology, Lawrence, KS, pp. 49–65Google Scholar
  37. Valsecchi E, Amos W (1996) Microsatellite markers for the study of cetacean populations. Molecular Ecology 5: 151–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang JY, Chou LS, White BN (1999) Mitochondrial DNA analysis of sympatric morphotypes of bottlenose dolphins (genus: Tursiops) in Chinese waters. Molecular Ecology 8: 1603–1612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Waples RS (1998) Separating the wheat from the chaff: Patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. Journal of Heredity 89: 438–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, De Wachter R (1993) Extraction of high molecular weight DNA from mollusks. Trends in Genetics 9: 407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wright S (1965) The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergio Escorza-Treviño
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frederick I. Archer
    • 2
  • Maria Rosales
    • 1
  • Aimee Lang
    • 2
  • Andrew E. Dizon
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyCalifornia State UniversityLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Southwest Fisheries Science CenterLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations