Conservation Genetics

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 225–230 | Cite as

Genetic identification of immigrants to the Scandinavian wolf population

  • J.M. Seddon
  • A.-K. Sundqvist
  • S. Björnerfeldt
  • H. Ellegren
Article

Abstract

Continued gene flow is fundamental to the survival of small, isolated populations. However, geography and human intervention can often act contrary to this requirement. The Scandinavian wolf population is threatened with a loss of genetic variation yet limited in the accessibility to new immigrants by the geographical distance of this peninsular population from its nearest neighbouring population and by human reluctance to allow wolves in the northern reindeer-breeding areas. In this study, we describe the identification of immigrants into this population using autosomal microsatellites, and maternally inherited mtDNA. Samples of 14 wolves collected in the “dispersal corridor” in northern Sweden in 2002–2005 were compared with 185 resident Scandinavian wolves and 79 wolves from the neighbouring Finnish population. We identified four immigrant wolves, suggesting some westward migration, although only one of these is likely to still survive. The integration of such immigrants into the breeding population is necessary to assure the long-term survival of this isolated and inbred population and highlights the importance of genetics techniques to the management of threatened populations.

Keywords

Canis lupus conservation gene flow immigration wolf 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support was obtained from the Norwegian and Swedish Environmental Protection Agencies. HE is a Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Research Fellow supported by a grant from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.

References

  1. Berry O, Tocher MD, Sarre SD (2004) Can assignment tests measure dispersal? Molecular Ecology 13: 551–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Belkhir K, Castric V, Bonhomme F (2002) IDENTIX, a software to test for relatedness in a population using permutation methods. Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 611–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Boerema AC (2000) Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations? Predictions from Drosphila. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 502–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ebert D, Haag C, Kirkpatrick M, Riek M, Hottinger JW, Pajunen VI (2002) A selective advantage to immigrant genes in a Daphnia metapopulation. Science 295: 485–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellegren H (1999) Inbreeding and relatedness in Scandinavian grey wolves Canis lupus. Hereditas 130: 239–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellegren H, Savolainen P, Rosen B (1996) The genetical history of an isolated population of the endangered grey wolf Canis lupus: a study of nuclear and mitochondrial polymorphisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B 351: 1661–1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankham R (1995) Conservation genetics. Annual Review of Genetics 29: 305–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hedmark E, Flagstad Ø, Segerström P, Persson J, Landa A, Ellegren H (2004) DNA-based individual and sex identification from wolverine (Gulo gulo) faeces and urine. Conservation Genetics 5: 405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ingvarsson PK, Whitlock MC (2000) Heterosis increases the effective immigration rate. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 267: 1321–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liberg O, Andrén H, Pedersen H-C, Sand H, Sejberg D, Wabakken P, Åkesson M, Bensch S (2005) Severe inbreeding depression in a wild wolf (Canis lupus) population. Biology Letters 1: 17–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Manel S, Gaggiotti OE, Waples R S (2005) Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 136–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mech LD (1981). The Wolf: The Ecology and Behaviour of an Endangered Species. University of Minesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  13. Olsen ML (2003) Causes of mortality of free-ranging Scandinavian gray wolves 1977–2003. Project Paper, The Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Department of Arctic Veterinary Medicine. TromsøGoogle Scholar
  14. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology 4: 347–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M, Estoup A (2004) Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Molecular Ecology 13: 55–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Primmer CR, Koskinen MT, Piironen J (2000) The one that did not get away: individual assignment using microsatellite data detects a case of fishing competition fraud. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series B 267: 1699–1704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43: 258–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rannala B, Mountain J (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94, 9197–9201Google Scholar
  20. Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seddon J (2005) Canid-specific primers for molecular sexing using tissue or non-invasive samples. Conservation Genetics 6:147–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vilà C, Amorim IR, Leonard JA, Posada D, Castroviejo J, Petrucci-Fonseca F, Crandall KA, Ellegren H, Wayne RK (1999) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography and population history of the grey wolf Canis lupus. Molecular Ecology 8: 2089–2103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Vilà C, Sundqvist A-K, Flagstad Ø, Seddon J, Björnerfeldt S, Kojola I, Casulli A, Sand H, Wabakken P, Ellegren H (2003) Rescue of a severely bottlenecked wolf (Canis lupus) population by a single immigrant. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B 270: 91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wabakken P, Aronson Å, Sand H, Strømseth TH, Kojola I (2004) Ulv i Skandinavia: Statusrapport for vinteren 2003–2004. Oppdragsrapport nr. 5–2004, Høgskolen i HedmarkGoogle Scholar
  25. Wabakken P, Sand H, Liberg O, Bjärvall A (2001) The recovery, distribution, and population dynamics of wolves on the Scandinavian peninsula, 1978–1998. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79: 710–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.M. Seddon
    • 1
    • 2
  • A.-K. Sundqvist
    • 2
  • S. Björnerfeldt
    • 2
  • H. Ellegren
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Veterinary Science, The University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Evolutionary BiologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations