Conservation Genetics

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 87–99

Allozyme diversity in the federally threatened golden paintbrush, Castilleja levisecta (Scrophulariaceae)

Article

Abstract

Castilleja levisecta (Scrophulariaceae), the golden paintbrush, is an insect-pollinated herbaceaous perennial found in the Pacific Northwest. Currently restricted to two island populations off British Columbia and nine populations (eight on islands) in Washington, C. levisecta is a rare species threatened with extinction. Allozymes were used to describe genetic diversity and structure in these eleven populations. Despite its threatened status and small geographic range, exceptionally high levels of genetic diversity are maintained within C. levisecta. All sixteen of the loci resolved were polymorphic within the species (Ps=100%), while the mean percentage of loci polymorphic within populations (Pp) was 65.7%. The mean number of alleles per polymorphic locus (APs) was 2.94 within the species and averaged 2.38 within populations (APp). Genetic diversity (Hes) was 0.285 for the species, whereas mean population genetic diversity (Hep) was 0.213. Smaller populations had, on average, fewer observed alleles and less genetic diversity. A significant negative correlation (r = −0.72) was found between genetic identity and geographic distance, indicating reduced gene flow between distant populations. The most geographically isolated population was one of the larger populations, one of the most genetically diverse and the most genetically divergent. A wide range of pairwise population genetic identities (I = 0.771 − 0.992) was found, indicating considerable genetic divergence between some populations. Overall, 19% of the total genetic diversity was distributed among populations. Results of this survey indicate that genetic augmentation of existing populations is unnecessary. The high allelic diversity found for the species and within its populations holds promise for conservation and restoration efforts to save this rare and threatened plant species.

Keywords

endangered genetic diversity rare reintroduction restoration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez-Buylla, ER, Garay, AA 1994Population genetic structure of Cecropia obtusifolia, a tropical pioneer tree speciesEvolution48437453Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, SCH, Kohn, JR 1991

    Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: Implications for conservation

    Falk, DAHolsinger, KE eds. Genetics and Conservation of Rare PlantsOxford University PressNew York330
    Google Scholar
  3. Boscaiu, M, Guemes, J 2001Breeding system and conservation strategy of the extremely endangered Cistus carthaginensis Pau (Cistaceae) of SpainIsrael J. Plant Sci.49213220Google Scholar
  4. Byers, DL, Meagher, TR 1992Mate availability in small populations of plant species with homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibilityHeredity68353359Google Scholar
  5. Caplow, F 2001Draft Reintroduction Plan for Castilleja levisecta (Golden Paintbrush). Washington Natural Heritage ProgramWashington Department of Natural Resources, OlympiaWA, USA46Google Scholar
  6. Cheliak WM, Pitel JA (1984) Techniques for Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Enzymes from Forest Tree Species. Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Information Report P1-X-42. Canadian Forestry Service, Agriculture, Chalk River, Ontario, 49 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Crawford, DJ 1983

    Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from electrophoretic studies

    Tanksely, SDOrton, TJ eds. Isozymes in Plant Breeding, part AElsevierAmsterdam257287
    Google Scholar
  8. DeMauro, MM 1993Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra)Conserv. Biol.7542550Google Scholar
  9. Ellstrand, NC, Elam, DR 1993Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservationAnn. Rev. Ecol. Sys.24217242Google Scholar
  10. El Mousadik, A, Petit, JA 1996High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic of MoroccoTheor. & Appl. Genet.92832839Google Scholar
  11. Gamon, J 1995Report on the status of Castilleja levisecta GreenmanWashington Natural Heritage Program, Washington Department of Natural ResourcesOlympia, WA, USA57Google Scholar
  12. Gilpin , ME, Soule′, ME 1986

    Minimum viable populations: Processes of species extinctions

    Soule′, ME eds. Conservation Biology The Science of Scarcity and DiversitySinauerSunderland, MA, USA934
    Google Scholar
  13. Gitzendanner, MA, Soltis, PS 2000Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread congenersAmer. J. Bot.87774782Google Scholar
  14. Godt, MJW, Hamrick, JL 1993Genetic diversity and population structure in Tradescantia hirsuticaulis (Commeliniaceae)Amer. J. Bot.80959966Google Scholar
  15. Godt, MJW, Hamrick, JL 1996Genetic differentiation and morphological differentiation in Liatris helleri (Asteraceae), a threatened plant speciesBiodiver. Conserv.5461471Google Scholar
  16. Godt, MJW, Johnson, BR, Hamrick, JL 1996Genetic diversity and population size in four rare southern Appalachian plant speciesConserv. Biol.10796805Google Scholar
  17. Godt, MJW, Hamrick, JL 1998Low allozyme diversity in Schwalbea americana (Scrophulariaceae), an endangered plant speciesJ. Hered.898993Google Scholar
  18. Gottlieb, LD 1973Genetic differentiation; sympatric speciation, and origin of a diploid species of StephanomeriaAmer. J. Bot.60545553Google Scholar
  19. Gottlieb, LD 1977Electrophoretic evidence and plant systematicsAnn. Mo. Bot. Gard.64161180Google Scholar
  20. Guerrant Jr EO (2003) Recommendations for Reintroduction of Castilleja levisecta Based on Patterns of Genetic Diversity as Revealed by Allozyme Data. Report to the Washington Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program.Google Scholar
  21. Hamrick, JL, Godt, MJW 1989

    Allozyme diversity in plant species

    Brown, AHDClegg, MTKahler, ALWeir, BS eds. Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic ResourcesSinauerSunderland, MA, USA4363
    Google Scholar
  22. Hardy, OJ, Vekemans, X 2001Patterns of allozyme variation in diploid and tetraploid Centaurea jacea at different spatial scalesEvolution55943954Google Scholar
  23. Heckard, LR 1962Root parasitism in CastillejaBot. Gaz.1242129Google Scholar
  24. Hedrick, PW 1985Genetics of Populations. Jones and BartlettBostonMA, USA629Google Scholar
  25. Hurlbert, SH 1971The nonconcept of species diversity: A critique and alternative parametersEcology52577586Google Scholar
  26. Kalinowski, ST 2004aCounting alleles with rarefaction: Private alleles and hierarchical sampling designsConserv. Genetics5539543Google Scholar
  27. Kalinowski ST (2004b) HP-Rare: A computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic diversity. Mol. Ecol. Notes, in press. Google Scholar
  28. Karron, JD 1987A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism in geographically restricted and widespread congenersEvol. Ecol.14758Google Scholar
  29. Kaye T, Lawrence B (2003) Fitness Effects of Inbreeding and Outbreeding on Golden Paintbrush (Castilleja levisecta): Implications for Recovery and Reintroduction. Report to the Washington Department of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  30. Krauss, SL, Dixon, B, Dixon, KW 2002Rapid genetic decline in a translocated population of the endangered plant Grevillea scapigeraConserv. Biol.16986994Google Scholar
  31. Li, CC, Horvitz, DG 1953Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficientAmer. J. Hum. Genet.5107117Google Scholar
  32. Lopez-Pujol, J, Bosch, M, Simon, J, Blanche, C 2002Allozyme variation and population structure of the very narrow endemic Seseli farrenyi (Apiaceae)Bot. J. Linn. Soc.138305314Google Scholar
  33. Loveless, MD, Hamrick, JL 1988Genetic organization and evolutionary history in two North American species of CirsiumEvolution42254265Google Scholar
  34. Manchenko, GP 1994Handbook of Detection of Enzymes on Electrophoretic GelsCRC PressAnn Arbor, MI, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. Messmore, NA, Knox, JS 1997The breeding system of the narrow endemic, Helenium virginicum (Asteraceae)J. Torrey Bot. Soc.124318321Google Scholar
  36. Mitton, JB, Linhart, YB, Sturgeon, KB, Hamrick, JL 1979Allozyme polymorphisms detected in mature needle tissue of ponderosa pineJ. Hered.708689Google Scholar
  37. Moran, GF, Hopper, SD 1983Genetic diversity and the insular population structure of the rare granite outcrop species, Eucalyptus caesia BenthAust. J. Bot.31161172Google Scholar
  38. Nei, M 1972Genetic distance between populationsAmer. Nat.106283292Google Scholar
  39. Nei, M 1973Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populationsProc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA7033213323Google Scholar
  40. Nei, M 1977F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populationsAnn. Hum. Genet.41225233Google Scholar
  41. Paschke, M, Abs, C, Schmid, B 2002Relationship between population size, allozyme variation, and plant performance in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavaricaConserv. Genetics3131144Google Scholar
  42. Petit, RJ, El Mousadik, A, Pons, O 1998Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markersConserv. Biol.12844855Google Scholar
  43. Pleasants, JM, Wendel, JF 1989Genetic diversity in a clonal narrow endemic, Erythronium propullans, and in its widespread progenitor, Erythronium albidumAmer. J. Bot.7611361151Google Scholar
  44. Rohlf, FG 1992NTSYS-pc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Exteter SoftwareSetauketNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Rousset, F 1997Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distanceGenetics14512191228Google Scholar
  46. Sheehan, M, Sprague, N 1984Report on the Status of Castilleja levisectaReport to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServicePortland, OR, USA82Google Scholar
  47. Soltis, PS, Soltis, DE 2000The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploidsProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9770517057Google Scholar
  48. Soltis, DE, Haufler, CH, Darrow, DC, Gastony, GJ 1983Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: A compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedulesAmer. Fern J.73927Google Scholar
  49. Soltis, PS, Plunkett, GM, Novak, SJ, Soltis, DE 1995Genetic variation in Tragopogon species–additional origins of the allotetraploids T. mirus and T. miscellus (Compositae)Amer. J. Bot.8213291341Google Scholar
  50. US Fish & Wildlife Service (1989) Heller’s Blazing Star Recovery Plan. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA, USA. Google Scholar
  51. US Fish & Wildlife Service (1997) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Determination of threatened status for Castilleja levisecta (Golden Paintbrush). Federal Register, 62(112), 31740–31748. Google Scholar
  52. Treuren, RR, Bijlsma, W, Delden, W, Ouborg, NJ 1991The significance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction. I. Genetic differentiation in Salvia pratensis and Scabiosa columbaria in relation to population sizeHeredity66181189Google Scholar
  53. Wang, ZF, Hamrick, JL, Godt, MJW 2004High genetic diversity in Sarracenia leucophylla (Sarraceniaceae), a carnivorous wetland herbJ. Hered.95234243Google Scholar
  54. Wendel, JF, Parks, CR 1982Genetic control of isozyme variation in Camillia japonica LJ. Hered.73197204Google Scholar
  55. Wentworth, JB 1994The Demography and Population Dynamics of Castilleja levisecta, an Endangered PerennialUniversity of WashingtonWA53MS thesisGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitlock, MC, McCauley, DE 1999Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST=1/(4Nm + 1)Hered.82117125Google Scholar
  57. Workman, PL, Niswander, JD 1970Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago.Amer. J. Hum. Genet.222449Google Scholar
  58. Wright, S 1922Coefficients of inbreeding and relationshipAmer. Nat.56330338Google Scholar
  59. Wright, S 1931Evolution in Mendelian populationsGenetics1697159Google Scholar
  60. Wright, S 1978Evolution and Genetics of Populations, Variability Among Natural PopulationsThe University of Chicago PressChicago, IL, USAVol. 4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Jo W. Godt
    • 1
  • Florence Caplow
    • 2
  • J.L. Hamrick
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Washington Natural Heritage ProgramWashington Department of Natural ResourcesOlympiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeneticsUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations