Conservation Genetics

, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp 603–617

Inferring demographic processes from the genetic structure of a metapopulation of Boltonia decurrens(Asteraceae)

  • Jennifer Dewoody
  • John D. Nason
  • Marian Smith
Article

Abstract

Boltonia decurrens(Asteraceae), a federally listed, threatened floodplain species, requires regular flooding for suitable habitat and seed dispersal. Flood suppression and habitat destruction have resulted in fewer than 25 populations remaining throughout its 400 km range. Because individual populations are widely interspaced (>10 km) and subject to frequent extinction and colonization, seed dispersal along the river, not pollen flow, is likely the primary determinant of population genetic structure. We used neutral genetic markers (isozymes) assayed for fourteen populations to determine which demographic processes contribute to the genetic structure of B. decurrens. Significant genetic differentiation was detected among populations (FST=0.098, P< 0.05) but not among regions (FRT=0.013, P> 0.05), suggesting that long-distance dispersal events occur and involve seed from a small number of populations. Correspondingly, we found no evidence of isolation by distance, and admixture analyses indicate that colonization events involve seed from 3 to 5 source populations. Individual populations exhibited high levels of fixation (mean FIS=0.192, P< 0.05), yet mean population outcrossing rates were high (tm=0.87–0.95) and spatial autocorrelation analyses revealed no fine-scale within population structure, indicating that inbreeding alone cannot explain the observed fixation. Rather, genetic bottlenecks, detected for 12 of 14 populations, and admixture at population founding may be important sources of fixation. These observations are consistent with a metapopulation model and confirm the importance of regular flooding events, capable of producing suitable habitat and dispersing seed long distances, to the long-term persistence of B. decurrens.

colonization hydrochory isozyme metapopulation plants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akimoto M, Shimamoto Y, Morishima H (1998) Population genetic structure of wild rice Oryza glumaepatula distributed in the Amazon. ood area in. uenced by its lifehistory traits. Mol. Ecol., 7, 1371–1381.Google Scholar
  2. Bellrose FC, Havera Jr SP, Paveglio FL, Steffeck DW (1983) The fate of the lakes in the Illinois River Valley. IL Nal. Hist. Surv. Biol. Notes, 119, 2–27.Google Scholar
  3. Clegg MT (1980) Measuring plant mating systems. BioScience, 30, 814–818.Google Scholar
  4. Cornuet J-M, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics, 114, 2001–2014.Google Scholar
  5. Cornuet J-M, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Solignac M (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics, 153, 1989–2000.Google Scholar
  6. Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP-Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3. 2). Cladistics, 5, 164–166.Google Scholar
  7. Giles BE, Goudet J (1997) A case study of genetic structure in a plant metapopulation. In: Metapopualtion Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution (eds. Hanski I, Gilpin ME), pp. 429–454. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Gornall RJ, Hollingsworth PM, Preston CD (1998) Evidence for spatial structure and directional gene flow in a population of an aquatic plant, Potamogeton coloratus. Heredity, 80, 414–421.Google Scholar
  9. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature, 396, 41–49.Google Scholar
  10. Hanski I, Gilpin ME (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: Brief history and conceptual domain. In: Metapopualtion Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations (eds. Gilpin ME, Hanski I), pp. 3–16. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Hanski I, Moilanen A, Gyllenberg M (1996) Minimum viable metapopulation size. Am Nat., 147, 527–541.Google Scholar
  12. Hanski I, Simberlo. D (1997) The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. In: Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution (eds. Hanski I, Gilpin ME), pp. 5–26. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Hartl DL, Clark AG (1997) Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Husband BC, Barrett SC (1996) A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. J. Ecol., 84, 461–469.Google Scholar
  15. Kalisz S, Nason JD, Hanzawa FM, Tonsor SJ (2001) Spatial population genetic structure in Trillium grandiflorum: The roles of dispersal, mating, history, and selection. Evolution, 55, 1560–1568.Google Scholar
  16. Kofoid CA (1903) Plankton studies IV. The plankton of the Illinois River. 1894–1899, with introductory notes upon the hydrography of the Illinois River and its basin. Part I. Quantitative investigations and general results. IL State Lab. Nat. Hist. Bull., 6, 95-635.Google Scholar
  17. Kudoh H, Whigham DF (1997) Microgeographic genetic structure and gene. ow in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae) populations. Am. J. Bot., 84, 1285–1293.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis PO, Zaykin D (2001) Genetic Data Analysis: Computer program for the analysis of allelic data Version 1. 0 (d16c). Free program distributed by the authors over the internet from http: //lewis. eeb. uconn. edu/lewishome/soft-ware. html.Google Scholar
  19. Manchenko GP (1994) Handbook of Detection of Enzymes on Electrophoretic Gels. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  20. McCauley DE (1991) Genetic consequences of local population extinction and recolonization. TREE, 6, 5–8.Google Scholar
  21. McCauley DE, Raveill J, Antonovics J (1995) Local founding events as determinants of genetic structure in a plant metapopulation. Heredity, 75, 630–636.Google Scholar
  22. Murphy RW, Sites JW, Buth DG, Haufler CH (1996) Isozyme electrophoresis. In: Molecular Systematics (eds. Moritz C, Hillis DM), pp. 51–120. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Nason JD, Hamrick JL, Fleming TH (2002) Historical vicariance and postglacial colonization effects on the evolution of genetic structure in Lophocereus, a Sonoran desert columnar cactus. Evolution, 56, 2214–2226.Google Scholar
  24. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat., 106, 283–292.Google Scholar
  25. Nei M, Chesser RK (1983) Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann. Hum. Genet., 47, 253–259.Google Scholar
  26. Page RDM (1998) GeneTree: Comparing gene and species phylogenies using reconciled trees. Bioinformatics, 14, 819–820.Google Scholar
  27. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet J-M (1999) BOTTLENECK: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the eective population size using allele frequency data. J. Here., 90, 502–503.Google Scholar
  28. Redmond A (1993) Population study of Boltonia decurrens, a federally threatened species. Masters Thesis, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, IL.Google Scholar
  29. Ritland K (2002) Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity, 88, 221–228.Google Scholar
  30. Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics, 145, 1219–1228.Google Scholar
  31. Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH, Goodwilliw C, Parker IM, Bishop JG (1994) Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology, 75, 584–606.Google Scholar
  32. Schwegman JE, Nyboer RW (1985) The taxonomic and population status of Boltonia decurrens (Torr & Gray) Wood. Castanea, 50, 112–115.Google Scholar
  33. Slatkin M(1977) Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theor. Popul. Biol., 12, 253–262.Google Scholar
  34. Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and nonequilibrium populations. Evolution, 47, 264–279.Google Scholar
  35. Smith M (1994) Effects of the flood of 1993 on the decurrent false aster (Boltonia decurrens), Final report submitted to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. 29 pp. Southern Illinois Universtiy at Edwardsville.Google Scholar
  36. Smith M, Keevin TM (1998) Achene morphology, production and germination, and potential for water dispersal in Boltonia decurrens (decurrent false aster), a threatened floodplain species. Rhodora, 100, 69–81.Google Scholar
  37. Smith M, Keevin TM, Mettler-McClure P, Barkau R (1998) Effect of the flood of 1993 on Boltonia decurrens, a rare floodplain plant. Regul. Rivers: Restor. Manage., 14, 191–202.Google Scholar
  38. Smith M, Moss JS (1998) An experimental investigation, using stomatal conductance and fluorescence, of the. ood sensi-tivity of Boltonia decurrens and its competitors. J. Appl. Ecol., 35, 553–561.Google Scholar
  39. Smith M, Wu Y, Green O (1993) Effect of light and water-stress on photosynthesis and biomass production in Boltonia decurrens (Asteraceae), a threatened species. Am. J. Bot., 80, 859–864.Google Scholar
  40. Soltis DE, Haufler CH, Darrow DC, Gastony GJ (1983) Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: A compilation of grinding buf-fers, gel and electrode bu. ers, and staining schedules. Am. Fern. J., 73, 9–27.Google Scholar
  41. Takenaka A, Washitani I, Kuramoto N, Inoue K (1996) Life history and demographic features of Aster kantoensis, an endangered local endemic of floodplains. Biol. Conserv., 78, 345–352.Google Scholar
  42. Thrall PH, Burdon JJ, Murray BR (1997) The metapopulation paradigm: A fragmented view of conservation biology. In: Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations (eds. Young AG, Clarke GM), pp. 75–95. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  43. Tofari SM (2000) A demographic investigation into the life history stages and reproductive biology of Boltonia decurrens, a threatened floodplain species. Masters Thesis, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, IL.Google Scholar
  44. U. S Fish and Wildlife Service (1988) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Determination of Threatened Status for Boltonia decurrens (Decurrent false aster). pp. 45858–45861. Twin Cities, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  45. U. S Fish and Wildlife Service (1990) Decurrent false aster recovery plan. U. S Fish and Wildlife Service, 26 pp. Twin Cities, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  46. Wade MJ, McCauley DE (1988) Extinction and recolonization: Their effects on the genetic differentiation of local populations. Evolution, 42, 995–1005.Google Scholar
  47. Waser NM, Vickery RK, Price MV (1982) Patterns of seed dispersal and population differentiation in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution, 36, 753–761.Google Scholar
  48. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358–1370.Google Scholar
  49. Wendel JF, Weeden NF (1989) Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Isozymes in Plant Biology (eds. Soltis DE, Soltis PS), pp. 5–45. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Dewoody
    • 1
    • 2
  • John D. Nason
    • 1
  • Marian Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal BiologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.USDA Forest ServiceNational Forest Genetics LaboratoryPlacervilleUSA

Personalised recommendations