Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 210–222 | Cite as

The Ambiguous Loss of Singlehood: Conceptualizing and Treating Singlehood Ambiguous Loss Among Never-Married Adults

Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

Ambiguous loss theory provides a framework for conceptualizing and treating singlehood ambiguous loss among adults who desire to be in a long-term committed romantic relationship, such as marriage, but have never been in such a relationship. Adults who have never married may experience an ambiguous loss due to the lack of clear information as to whether their anticipated spouse, who is psychologically present yet physically absent, will materialize at some point. This lack of clear information about an indefinitely missing anticipated spouse tends to create ambivalence about holding on to the prospect that the anticipated spouse will materialize versus moving on through accepting and grieving the loss of the non-materialized anticipated spouse. The absence of rituals for demarcating singlehood ambiguous loss may increase ambivalence. The degree of ambivalence experienced from adult singlehood ambiguous loss likely varies according to the developmental timing of singlehood, decisions between settling and indefinite singlehood, unviable potential spouses, and non-materialized children. Specific treatment recommendations (i.e., avoiding contraindicated treatment approaches, implementing an informed not-knowing stance, and fostering dialectical thinking) and specific interventions for adapting the established treatment for ambiguous loss (i.e., increasing resilience through normalizing ambivalence, tempering mastery, finding meaning, reconstructing identity, revising attachment, and discovering hope) for clients struggling with the ambiguous loss of singlehood are presented.

Keywords

Ambiguous loss Single Treatment Therapy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Leslie Feinauer, Nicole Gutierrez, Mallory Jackson, Megan Oka, Kimberly Ortiz, Brandon Silverthorn, Andrea Swenson, LaNae Valentine, and Cherilyn Worthen for their thoughtful feedback.

References

  1. Adamczyk, K. (2017). Voluntary and involuntary singlehood and young adults’ mental health: An investigation of mediating role of romantic loneliness. Current Psychology, 36, 888–904.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9478-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldous, J., & Ganey, R. F. (1999). Family life and the pursuit of happiness: The influence of gender and race. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C., Stewart, S., & Dimidjian, S. (1994). Flying solo: Single women in midlife. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, A. E. (2000). Marital trajectories and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(4), 451–464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berge, J. M., & Holm, K. E. (2007). Boundary ambiguity in parents with chronically ill children: Integrating theory and research. Family Relations, 56, 123–134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00446.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berliner, K., Jacob, D., & Schwartzberg, N. (2011). Single adults and the life cycle. In M. McGoldrick, B. Carter & N. A. G. Preto (Eds.), The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives (4th ed., pp. 163–175). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  8. Bock, J. D. (2000). Doing the right thing? Single mothers by choice and the struggle for legitimacy. Gender & Society, 14, 62–86.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014001005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bock, J. D. (2001). Single mothers by choice: From here to maternity. Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering, 3, 88–102.Google Scholar
  10. Boss, P. (1991). Ambiguous loss. In F. Walsh & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), Living beyond loss: Death in the family (pp. 164–175). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Boss, P. (1999). Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Boss, P. (2002). Family stress management: A contextual approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boss, P. (2004a). Ambiguous loss. In F. Walsh & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), Living beyond loss (2nd ed., pp. 237–246). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Boss, P. (2004b). Ambiguous loss research, theory, and practice: Reflections after 9/11. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 551–566.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00037.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boss, P. (2006). Loss, trauma, and resilience. London: Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Boss, P., Caron, W., Horbal, J., & Mortimer, J. (1990). Predictors of depression in caregivers of dementia patients: Boundary ambiguity and mastery. Family Process, 29, 245–254.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1990.00245.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Boss, P., & Greenberg, J. (1984). Family boundary ambiguity: A new variable in family stress theory. Family Process, 23, 535–546.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00535.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss, Vol. 3: Loss, sadness, and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Carlson, D. L. (2012). Deviations from desired age at marriage: Mental health differences across marital status. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 743–758.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00995.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coolhart, D., Ritenour, K., & Grodzinski, A. (2017). Experiences of ambiguous loss for parents of transgender male youth: A phenomenological exploration. Contemporary Family Therapy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9426-x.Google Scholar
  23. Cox, F. D. (2006). Human intimacy, relationships, marriage, and the family. In Human intimacy: Marriage, the family, and its meaning (10th ed., pp. 28–59). Belmont, CA: Thompson/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  24. Crockett, L. J., & Beal, S. J. (2012). The life course in the making: Gender and the development of adolescents’ expected timing of adult role transitions. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1727–1738.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. De Jong Gierveld, J., van Tilburg, T., & Dykstra, P. A. (2006). Loneliness and social isolation. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 485–499). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Shazer, S. (1985). Keys to solution in brief therapy. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  27. DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2005.9682918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2006). The unrecognized stereotyping and discrimination against singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 251–254.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00446.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Doka, K. J. (1989). Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow. Lexington, MA: Lexington Press.Google Scholar
  30. Elder, G. (1998). The life course as a developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Epston, D., & White, M. (1992). Consulting your consultants: The documentation of alternative knowledges. In Experience, contradiction, narrative and imagination: Selected papers of David Epston and Michael White, 1989–1991 (pp. 11–26). Adelaide: Dulwich Center.Google Scholar
  32. Fitzpatrick, J., Sharp, E. A., & Reifman, A. (2009). Midlife singles’ willingness to date partners with heterogeneous characteristics. Family Relations, 58(1), 121–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fraley, R. C., & Davis, K. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 131–144.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00135.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s search for meaning (2006). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hernandez, B. C., & Wilson, C. M. (2007). Another kind of ambiguous loss: Seventh-day Adventist women in mixed-orientation marriages. Family Relations, 56, 184–195.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00451.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Inglis, A., & Greenglass, E. R. (1989). Motivation for marriage among women and men. Psychological Reports, 65, 1035–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, S. M. (2003). Introduction to attachment: A therapist’s guide to primary relationships and their renewal. In S. M. Johnson & V. E. Whiffen (Eds.), Attachment processes in couple and family therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Laird, J. (1998). Theorizing culture: Narrative ideas and practice principles. In M. McGoldrick (Ed.), Re-visioning family therapy: Race, culture, and gender in clinical practice (pp. 20–36). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Landgraf, J. R. (1990). Singling: A new way to live the single life. Louisville, KY: Westminster.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, G. R., & Payne, K. K. (2010). Changing marriage patterns since 1970: What’s going on, and Why? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41, 537–555.Google Scholar
  41. Lewis, K. G. (1994). Single heterosexual women through the life cycle. In M. P. Mirkin (Ed.), Women in context: Toward a feminist reconstruction of psychotherapy (pp. 170–187). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lewis, K. G., & Moon, S. (1997). Always single and single again women: A qualitative study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23, 115–134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb00238.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Linehan, M. M. (2015). DBT skills training manual (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mazor, A. (2004). Single motherhood via donor-insemination (DI): Separation, absence, and family creation. Contemporary Family Therapy, 26, 199–215.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COFT.0000031243.42875.f4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller, A. L., Rathus, J. H., & Linehan, M. M. (2006). Dialectical behavior therapy with suicidal adolescents. New York, NJ: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  46. Moustakas, C. (1961). Loneliness. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  47. Nietzsche, F. (1888). Twilight of the Idols. Trans., 1998). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Reynolds, J. (2002). Constructing the single woman in therapy. Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, 2, 20–31.Google Scholar
  49. Roper, S. O., & Jackson, J. B. (2007). The ambiguities of out-of-home care: Children with severe or profound disabilities. Family Relations, 56, 147–161.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00448.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rucker, N. (1993). Cupid’s misses: Relational vicissitudes in the analyses of single women. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 20, 377–391.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schachner, D. A., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2008). Attachment style and long-term singlehood. Personal Relationships, 15, 479–491.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00211.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwartzberg, N., Berliner, K., & Jacob, D. (1995). Single in a married world: A life cycle framework for working with the unmarried adult. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  53. Seecombe, K., & Ishii-Kuntz, M. (1994). Gender and social relationship among the never-married. Sex Roles, 30, 585–603.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shapiro, V. (1995). Subjugated knowledge and the working alliance: The narratives of Russian Jewish immigrants. In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, 1(4), 9–22.Google Scholar
  55. Sharp, E. A., & Ganong, L. (2007). Living in the gray: Women’s experiences of missing the marital transition. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 831–844.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00408.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shaver, P., & Hazan, C. (1987). Being lonely, falling in love: Perspectives from attachment theory. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 2(2), 105–124.Google Scholar
  57. Sifton, E. (2003). The serenity prayer: Faith and politics in times of peace and war. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  58. Spinoza (1667). Ethics (G. H. R. Parkinson Trans., 2000). In J. Cottingham (Ed.), Oxford philosophical texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Marital status of the population 15 years old and over, by sex and race—1950 to present. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam.html.
  60. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). 2012 Economic census product lines statistics by industry for the U.S. and states. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2012_US_81SLLS1&prodType=table.
  61. U.S. Census Bureau. (2015a). America’s families and living arrangements: 2015 (Table A1: Marital status of people 15 years and over, by age, sex, and personal earnings: 2015). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/hhes/families/data/cps2015A.html.
  62. U.S. Census Bureau. (2015b). Unmarried and Single Americans Week Sept. 20–26, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/facts-for-features/2015/cb15-ff19.html.
  63. U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Table MS-2: Estimated median age at first marriage, by sex: 1890 to the present. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/hhes/families/files/ms2.csv.
  64. van Deurzen, E. (2002). Existential counseling and pyschotherapy in practice (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  65. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  66. Weiss, R. S. (1987). Reflections on the present state of loneliness research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  67. White, M., & Epson, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marriage and Family Therapy ProgramVirginia TechFalls ChurchUSA

Personalised recommendations