Family Dynamics in Digital Homes: The Role Played by Parental Mediation in Young Children’s Digital Practices Around 14 European Countries
In contemporary society, digital media are fully integrated in our daily lives, indispensable for our routines, always connected and at-hand. Our research thus explores the parental mediation of portable digital devices in families with young children, addressing the following questions: (a) which are the most common parental mediation styles adopted towards young children; and (b) which individual features of the parents or contextual factors influence the parental mediation style adopted. Our methodology is exploratory and qualitative, considering as empirical corpus 14 national reports from the European-scale study “Young Children (0–8) and Digital Technologies” for a comparative thematic analysis. The authoritative style was the most common parental mediation style related to technology use. In general, there are transversal rules to all parental mediation styles (except laissez-faire style), such as withdraw or give devices to children according to their behavior, control (inappropriate) content and control the time of use. Also, parental perceptions and attitudes about the technologies played a heavier weight on the parental mediation style adopted, and consequently influenced the relationship of the children with digital media. Some implications for future studies, preventive actions, and family therapy are discussed.
KeywordsYoung children Digital media Parental mediation Perceptions Practices
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Baumrind, D. (1991). Parenting styles and adolescent development. In J. Brooks-Gunn, R. Lerner & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), The encyclopedia on adolescence (pp. 746–758). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
- Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Chaudron, S., Plowman, L., Beutel, M. E., Černikova, M., Navarette, Donoso, Dreier, V., M., & Wölfling, K. (2015). Young children (0–8) and digital technology—EU report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- Dias, P., & Brito, R. (2016). Crianças (0 a 8 anos) e tecnologias digitais [Children (0 to 8 years-old) and digital technologies]. Lisboa: Centro de Estudos em Comunicação e Cultura, Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Retrieved March 24, 2017, from http://goo.gl/obFv4L.
- Dias, P., Brito, R., Ribbens, W., Daniela, L., Rubene, Z., Dreier, M., Gemo, M., Di Gioia, R., & Chaudron, S. (2016). The role of parents in the engagement of young children with digital technologies: Exploring tensions between rights of access and protection, from ‘gatekeepers’ to ‘scaffolders’. Global Studies of Childhood. doi: 10.1177/2043610616676024.Google Scholar
- Duimel, M., & de Haan, J. (2007). Nieuwe links in het gezin [New links in the family]. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://www.scp.nl/publicaties/boeken/9789037702873/Nieuwe_links_in_het_gezin.pdf.
- European Commission. (2008). Towards a safer use of the Internet for children in the EU: A parents’ perspective. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/sip/docs/eurobarometer/analyticalreport_2008.pdf.
- Hajvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.Google Scholar
- Johnson, G. M., & Puplampu, K. P. (2008). Internet use during childhood and the ecological techno-subsystem. Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 34(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
- Leathers, H., Summers, S., & Desollar, A. (2013). Toddlers on technology: A parents’ guide. Illinois: AuthorHouse.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2004). UK children go online: Surveying the experiences of young people and their parents. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from http://www.york.ac.uk/res/e-society/projects/1/UKCGOsurveyreport.pdf.
- Pauwels, C., Bauwens, J., & Vleugels, C. (2008). Cyberteens: De betekenis van ICT in het dagelijkse leven van Belgische tieners. [Cyberteens: The relevance of ICT in daily life of Belgian teenagers]. Retrieved March 24, 2017, from http://www.eprivacy.be/SID-TIRO-PERSMAP-samenvatting-SMIT-VUB-120208.pdf.
- QSR. (2015). NVivo11 Pro for windows. QSR International Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
- Valkenburg, P. (2002). Beeldschermkinderen: Theorieën over kind en media [Screen-kids: Theories about children and media]. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
- Valkenburg, P., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A., & Marseille, N. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three different styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation”, “restrictive mediation”, and “social coviewing”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. doi: 10.1080/08838159909364474.Google Scholar
- Walrave, M., Lenaerts, S., & De Moor, S. (2008). Cyberteens @ risk: Tieners verknocht aan internet, maar ook waakzaam voor risico’s. [Cyberteens @ risk: Teenagers addicted to the internet but vigilant as to internet risks]. Retrieved March 27, 2017, from http://www.e-privacy.be/SID-TIRO-PERSMAP-samenvatting-survey-UA-OSC120208.pdf.