Advertisement

Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 271–280 | Cite as

Family Dynamics in Digital Homes: The Role Played by Parental Mediation in Young Children’s Digital Practices Around 14 European Countries

  • Rita Brito
  • Rita Francisco
  • Patrícia DiasEmail author
  • Stephane Chaudron
Original Paper

Abstract

In contemporary society, digital media are fully integrated in our daily lives, indispensable for our routines, always connected and at-hand. Our research thus explores the parental mediation of portable digital devices in families with young children, addressing the following questions: (a) which are the most common parental mediation styles adopted towards young children; and (b) which individual features of the parents or contextual factors influence the parental mediation style adopted. Our methodology is exploratory and qualitative, considering as empirical corpus 14 national reports from the European-scale study “Young Children (0–8) and Digital Technologies” for a comparative thematic analysis. The authoritative style was the most common parental mediation style related to technology use. In general, there are transversal rules to all parental mediation styles (except laissez-faire style), such as withdraw or give devices to children according to their behavior, control (inappropriate) content and control the time of use. Also, parental perceptions and attitudes about the technologies played a heavier weight on the parental mediation style adopted, and consequently influenced the relationship of the children with digital media. Some implications for future studies, preventive actions, and family therapy are discussed.

Keywords

Young children Digital media Parental mediation Perceptions Practices 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aunola, K., Stattin, H. K., & Nurmi, J. (2000). Parenting styles and adolescents’ achievement strategies. Journal of Adolescence. doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacigalupe, G., Camara, M., & Buffardi, L. E. (2014). Technology in families and the clinical encounter: Results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Family Therapy. doi: 10.1111/1467-6427.12042.Google Scholar
  3. Barkin, S., Ip, E., Richardson, I., Klinepeter, S., Finch, S., & Krcmar, M. (2006). Parental media mediation styles for children aged 2 to 11 years. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.4.395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Takeuchi, L., & Fithian, R. (2009). Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media. doi: 10.1162/ijlm.2009.0021.Google Scholar
  5. Baumrind, D. (1991). Parenting styles and adolescent development. In J. Brooks-Gunn, R. Lerner & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), The encyclopedia on adolescence (pp. 746–758). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  6. Beebe, T., Asche, S., Harrison, P., & Quinlan, K. (2004). Heightened vulnerability and increased risk-taking among adolescent chat room users: Results from a statewide school survey. Journal of Adolescent Health. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.09.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bittman, M., Rutherford, L., Brown, J., & Unsworth, L. (2011). Digital natives? New and old media and children’s outcomes. Australian Journal of Education. doi: 10.1177/000494411105500206.Google Scholar
  8. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carvalho, J., Francisco, R., & Relvas, A. P. (2015). Family functioning and information and communication technologies: How do they relate? A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.037.Google Scholar
  11. Chaudron, S., Plowman, L., Beutel, M. E., Černikova, M., Navarette, Donoso, Dreier, V., M., & Wölfling, K. (2015). Young children (0–8) and digital technology—EU report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, S. L., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2015). Parental co-use of media technology with their young children in the USA. Journal of Children and Media. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2015.997440.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, J., & Gentile, D. (2012). Responses to children’s media use in families with and without siblings: A family development perspective. Family Relations. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00703.x.Google Scholar
  14. Dias, P., & Brito, R. (2016). Crianças (0 a 8 anos) e tecnologias digitais [Children (0 to 8 years-old) and digital technologies]. Lisboa: Centro de Estudos em Comunicação e Cultura, Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Retrieved March 24, 2017, from http://goo.gl/obFv4L.
  15. Dias, P., Brito, R., Ribbens, W., Daniela, L., Rubene, Z., Dreier, M., Gemo, M., Di Gioia, R., & Chaudron, S. (2016). The role of parents in the engagement of young children with digital technologies: Exploring tensions between rights of access and protection, from ‘gatekeepers’ to ‘scaffolders’. Global Studies of Childhood. doi: 10.1177/2043610616676024.Google Scholar
  16. Duimel, M., & de Haan, J. (2007). Nieuwe links in het gezin [New links in the family]. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://www.scp.nl/publicaties/boeken/9789037702873/Nieuwe_links_in_het_gezin.pdf.
  17. European Commission. (2008). Towards a safer use of the Internet for children in the EU: A parentsperspective. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/sip/docs/eurobarometer/analyticalreport_2008.pdf.
  18. Goh, W., Bay, S., & Chen, V. (2014). Young school children´s use of digital devices and parental rules. Telematics and Informatics. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.04.002.Google Scholar
  19. Hajvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.Google Scholar
  20. Hollingsworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00431.x.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, G. M., & Puplampu, K. P. (2008). Internet use during childhood and the ecological techno-subsystem. Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 34(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
  22. Kucirnova, N., & Sakr, M. (2015). Child-father creative text-making at home with crayons, iPad collage and PC. Thinking Skills and Creativity. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2015.05.003.Google Scholar
  23. Leathers, H., Summers, S., & Desollar, A. (2013). Toddlers on technology: A parents’ guide. Illinois: AuthorHouse.Google Scholar
  24. Livingstone, S. (2007). Strategies of parental regulation in the media-rich home. Computers in Human Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.002.Google Scholar
  25. Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2004). UK children go online: Surveying the experiences of young people and their parents. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from http://www.york.ac.uk/res/e-society/projects/1/UKCGOsurveyreport.pdf.
  26. Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J. S., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2008). Protecting children’s privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.004.Google Scholar
  27. Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2005). Protecting youth online: Family use of filtering and blocking software. Child Abuse & Neglect. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.05.008.Google Scholar
  28. Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s internet use. Learning, Media and Technology. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.782038.Google Scholar
  29. Pauwels, C., Bauwens, J., & Vleugels, C. (2008). Cyberteens: De betekenis van ICT in het dagelijkse leven van Belgische tieners. [Cyberteens: The relevance of ICT in daily life of Belgian teenagers]. Retrieved March 24, 2017, from http://www.eprivacy.be/SID-TIRO-PERSMAP-samenvatting-SMIT-VUB-120208.pdf.
  30. Plowman, L., & McPake, J. (2013). Seven myths about young children and technology. Childhood Education. doi: 10.1080/00094056.2013.757490.Google Scholar
  31. Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education. doi: 10.1080/03057640802287564.Google Scholar
  32. Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2010). The technologisation of childhood? Young children and technology in the home. Children & Society. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00180.x.Google Scholar
  33. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816.Google Scholar
  34. QSR. (2015). NVivo11 Pro for windows. QSR International Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  35. Stevenson, O. (2011). From public policy to family practices: Researching the everyday realities of families technology use at home. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00430.x.Google Scholar
  36. Valcke, M., Bonte, S., Wener, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55(2), 454–464. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Valkenburg, P. (2002). Beeldschermkinderen: Theorieën over kind en media [Screen-kids: Theories about children and media]. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  38. Valkenburg, P., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A., & Marseille, N. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three different styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation”, “restrictive mediation”, and “social coviewing”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. doi: 10.1080/08838159909364474.Google Scholar
  39. Walrave, M., Lenaerts, S., & De Moor, S. (2008). Cyberteens @ risk: Tieners verknocht aan internet, maar ook waakzaam voor risicos. [Cyberteens @ risk: Teenagers addicted to the internet but vigilant as to internet risks]. Retrieved March 27, 2017, from http://www.e-privacy.be/SID-TIRO-PERSMAP-samenvatting-survey-UA-OSC120208.pdf.
  40. Wang, R., Bianchi, S. M., & Raley, S. B. (2005). Teenagers’ internet use and family rules: A research note. Journal of Marriage and Family. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00214.x.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, K. C., & Lee, S. L. (2016). Focus on family: Tablets and laptops and Skype, Oh My! How do families and early childhood educators make technology decisions? Childhood Education. doi: 10.1080/00094056.2016.1180934.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UIDEF – Instituto de EducaçãoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Faculdade de Ciências HumanasUniversidade Católica PortuguesaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Research Center for Psychological Science (CICPSI), Faculdade de PsicologiaUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.Research Centre for Communication and CultureUniversidade Católica PortuguesaLisbonPortugal
  5. 5.Joint Research CenterEuropean CommissionIspraItaly

Personalised recommendations