Advertisement

Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 12–20 | Cite as

Family Therapy in Chinese Culture and Context: Lessons from Supervising Therapists-in-Training in China

  • Karen Mui-Teng Quek
  • Hao-Min Chen
Original Paper

Abstract

Systemic family therapy as an essential paradigm for treating couples and families has gone global since its initial rise to popularity. According to researchers, China has signaled a strong desire for training in systemic family therapy. Even though this mode of mental health service is a foreign import to China, the surge in interest for Western psychotherapy for individuals and families grows by leaps and bounds. However there has been evolving conversations about the transportability of systemic family therapy from the West to the East. Using a qualitative focus group format, this study explored the experiences of sixteen Chinese couple and family therapists on their perspectives in adapting systemic family therapy concepts to the local Chinese context. Results reveal the interplay between the systems of the changing Chinese family structure and of the application of family therapy models that originated from the West must work harmoniously in order to enhance the goodness of the familial system within the evolving Chinese society in the 21st century.

Keywords

Family therapy Collectivism Chinese Self-identity Focus groups Qualitative 

References

  1. Blake, M. L. (1991). The portability of family therapy to different cultural and socio-economic contexts. Asian-Pacific Journal of Social Work, 1, 32–60. doi: 10.1080/21650993.1991.9755578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breunlin, D., Schwartz, R., & Kune-Karrer, B. (1997). Metaframeworks. San Franciso, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, S. (2013). Family therapy in Macau: Development, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Family Therapy, 35, 441–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2011.00578.x.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, P.H., (2003). Reconstructing the ethics of counseling in the Taiwan/Ethnic Chinese social context. Asian Journal of Counseling, 10, 11–32.Google Scholar
  6. Cheung, K. W., & Pan, S. (2006). Transitions of moral education in Ca: Towards regulated individualism. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 2, 37–50.Google Scholar
  7. Deng, L., Lin, X., Lan, J., & Fang, X. (2013). Family therapy in China. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 420–436. doi: 10.1007/s10591-013-9273-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Epstein, N., Berger, A., Fang, J., Messina, L., Smith, J., & Lloyd, T. (2012). Applying western-developed family therapy models in China. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 23, 217–237. doi: 10.1080/08975353.2012.705661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection. New York, NY: Brunner Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Joseph, W. A. (2001). Cultural revolution. In J. Krieger (Ed.), The Oxford companion to comparative politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen theory. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Knodel, J. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35–50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krueger, R. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Kwan, K. K. (2000). Counseling Chinese peoples: Perspectives of filial piety. Asian Journal of Counseling, 7, 23–42.Google Scholar
  15. Kwan, K. K. (2009). Collectivistic conflict of Chinese in counseling: Conceptualization and therapeutic directions. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 967–986. doi: 10.1177/0011000009339974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lim, S.-L., Lim, B., Michael, R., Cai, R., & Schock, C. (2010). The trajectory of counseling in China: Past, present, and future trends. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88, 4–8. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00141.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller, J. K., & Fang, X. (2012). Marriage and family therapy in the People’s Republic of China: Current issues and challenges. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 23, 173–183. doi: 10.1080/08975353.2012.705626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mittal, M., & Hardy, K. (2005). A re-examination of the current status and future of family therapy in India. Contemporary Family Therapy, 27, 285–300. doi: 10.1007/s10591-005-6210-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morgan, D., & Krueger, R. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3–19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ng, K. (1998). Family therapy in Malaysia: An update. Contemporary Family Therapy, 20, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ng, K. S. (Ed.). (2003). Global perspectives in family therapy: Development, practice, trends. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Nichols, M. (2012). Family therapy, concepts and methods. New York, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  24. Nwoye, A. (2006). Theory and method of marriage therapy in contemporary Africa. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28, 437–457. doi: 10.1007/s10591-006-9021-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  26. Quek, K., & Storm, C. (2012). Chinese values in supervisory discourse: Implications for culturally sensitive practices. Contemporary Family Therapy, 34, 44–56. doi: 10.1007/s10591-011-9172-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Satir, V., & Baldwin, M. (1984). Satir step by step: A guide to creating change in families. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.Google Scholar
  28. Shi, L. (2006). The successors to Confucianism or a new generation? A questionnaire study on Chinese students’ culture of learning English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19, 122–147. doi: 10.1080/07908310608668758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sim, T. (2012). The growing pains of family therapy in Singapore. Journal of Family Therapy, 34, 204–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00519.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sim, T., & Hu, C. (2009). Family therapy in the forbidden city: A review of chinese journals from 1978 to 2006. Family Process, 48, 559–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01302.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, J., Miller, J. K., & Zhao, X. (2014). Family functioning and social support in men and women diagnosed with depression in China. Contemporary Family Therapy, 36, 232–241. doi: 10.1007/s10591-013-9294-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu, Y. (2014). The cultural revolution at the margins: Chinese socialism in crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang, J. (2010). The persuasiveness of individualistic and collectivistic advertising appeals among Chinese Generation-X consumers. Journal of Advertising, 39, 69–80. doi: 10.2753/joa0091-3367390305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marriage and Family Therapy Program, Bethel SeminaryBethel UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Couple and Family TherapyAlliant International UniversityIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations