Advertisement

Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 293–312 | Cite as

Social Uterus: A Developmental Concept in Family Therapy for Psychosomatic Disorders

  • Vladislav Chvála
  • Ludmila Trapková
  • David SkorunkaEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The article introduces a concept of social uterus as an integrative model of family development. The concept has been gradually developed by two of the authors of the article through extensive clinical work with individuals and families during the last two decades. It has shown to have clinical validity, particularly in family therapy for psychosomatic disorders and various chronic somatic diseases. In the article, we first present a short description of our perspective on psychosomatic issues. We also give some information about the broader context of psychosomatic medicine and family therapy in our country. The main part of the article focuses on the concept of social uterus in detail. With regard to process of family therapy, both promising and controversial aspects of the concept are discussed. We conclude with some ideas concerning a need for collaborative health care in the treatment of psychosomatic disorders.

Keywords

Social uterus Family Family therapy Psychosomatic disorders Separation process 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Although the article is a joint project and the pronoun we is mainly used in the text, a clarification regarding the authorship should be made. The original concept of Social Uterus described in the article has been developed by Vladislav Chvála and Ludmila Trapková. Once a trainee in the family therapy training run by a team of supervisors with those two senior colleagues taking the lead, David Skorunka applied the concept in his psychiatry and family therapy clinical practice. He has also been including the concept in his teaching about family therapy, narrative approach and psychosomatic medicine and thus received fruitful feedback from both the Czech and the international students in the undergraduate programs in both medicine and psychology.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2004). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Arlington: APA.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, P. J., & Wiseman, H. (2004). The core conflictual relationship theme approach to relational narratives: Interpersonal themes in the context of intergenerational communication of trauma. In A. Lieblich, P. D. McAdams, & R. Josselson (Eds.), Healing plots: The narrative basis of psychotherapy (pp. 151–170). Washington: APA.Google Scholar
  3. Bateson, G. (1988). Mind and nature: Necessary unity. New York: Bantam Book.Google Scholar
  4. Bauer, J., & Kächele, H. (2005). “Psychosomatic medicine” in Germany: Its position between neurobiology and psychiatry. Psychoterapie 10 jahrg., 10(1). München: CIP-Medien, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  5. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. (1981). Unsichtbare Bindungen. Die Dynamik familiärer Systeme. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  6. Bowen, M., & Kerr, E. M. (1988). Family evaluation. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Bowlby, J. (2010). Vazba; Teorie kvality raných vztahů mezi matkou a dítětem. Praha: Portál.Google Scholar
  8. Breunlin, D. C. (1989). Clinical implications of oscillation theory: Family development and the process of change. In V. N. Christian & J. R. Ramsey (Eds.), Family systems in medicine (pp. 135–149). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, L. S. (2004). Family structure and the child well-being: The significance of parental cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Carter, E. A., & Mc Goldrick, M. (1980). The family life cycle: A framework for family therapy. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cassidy, J. (2008). The nature of the child’s ties. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (pp. 3–22). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cassidy, J., & Shaver, R. P. (2008). The handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Český statistický úřad. (2010). Česká republika od roku 1989 v číslech. http://www.czso.cz/csu/redakce.nsf/i/cr_od_roku_1989#01. Accessed 25 February 2012.
  15. Chvála, V. (2009). Dvacetiletá zkušenost s léčbou pacientů s psychosomatickou poruchou ve středisku komplexní terapie v Liberci. Psychosom, 7(2), 93–103.Google Scholar
  16. Chvála, V., Trapková, L. Novák, T., & Lattová, Z. (2012). Family therapy in the Czech Republic. International Review of Psychiatry (in press).Google Scholar
  17. Council of Europe. (2004). Recent demographic developments in Europe. http://www.coe.int/t/e/social_cohesion/population/Demo2004EN.pdf. Accessed 25 February 2012.
  18. Crittenden, P. (2008). Raising parents: Attachment, parenting and child safety. Portland: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Crittenden, P., & Landini, A. (2011). Assessing adult attachment: A dynamic-maturational model to discourse analysis. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Dallos, R. (2006). Attachment narrative therapy. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dallos, R., & Crittenden, P. (2009). All in the family: Integrating attachment and family systems theory. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 14(3), 389–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engel, G. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Erikson, E. H. (1993). Childhood and society. New York: W.W. Norton & Comp.Google Scholar
  24. Etherton, J., Bridge, S., Hertzell, D., Horder, J., & Parker, K. (2007). Cohabitation; the financial consequences of relationship breakdown. London. Retrieved 16 January 2012 from www.lawcom.gov.uk.
  25. Fink, P., Rosendal, M., & Toft, T. (2002). Assessment and treatment of functional disorders in general practice: The extended reattribution and management model–an advanced educational program for nonpsychiatric doctors. Psychosomatics: Journal of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, 43(2), 93–131. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.43.2.93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fink, P., Sørensen, L., Engberg, M., Holm, M., & Munk-Jørgensen, P. (1999). Somatization in primary care: Prevalence, health care utilization, and general practitioner recognition. Psychosomatics: Journal of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, 40(4), 330–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flaskas, C. (2002). Family therapy beyond postmodernism: Practice challenges theory. Hove: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glaeson, B. J. (1975). Fathers and other strangers: Men’s speech to young children. In D. P. Dato (Ed.), Developmental psycholinguistics: Theory and applications (pp. 171–222). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Grames, H. A., Miller, R. B., Robinson, W., Higgins, D. J., & Hinton, W. (2008). A test of contextual theory: The relationship among relational ethics, marital satisfaction, health problems, and depression. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 30(4), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Griffith, E. M., & Griffith, L. J. (1995). When patients somatize and clinicians stigmatize. In S. Friedman (Ed.), The reflecting team in action (pp. 81–99). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Harvey, D. M., Curry, C. J., & Bray, J. H. (1991). Individuation and intimacy in intergenerational relationships and health: Patterns across two generations. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 204–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hofmann, L. (1982). Grundlagen der Familientherapie. Hamburg: ISKO.Google Scholar
  33. Hotopf, M., Nimuan, Ch., & Wessely, S. (2001). Medically unexplained symptoms: An epidemiological study in seven specialities. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 51(1), 361–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klever, P. (2003). Intergenerational fusion and nuclear family functioning. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25(4), 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lambert, M. (2004). Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavioral change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Marner, T. (2000). Letters to children in family therapy. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Maturana, H. (1987). The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In E. R. Caianiello (Ed.), Physics of cognitive process (pp. 324–379). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. McDaniel, S., Campbell, T., & Seaburn, D. (1989). Somatic fixation in patients and physicians: A biopsychosocial approach. Family Systems Medicine, 7(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miculincer, M., & Shaver, R. P. (2010). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí (MPSV). (2004). Národní zpráva o rodině. http://www.mpsv.cz/files/clanky/899/zprava_b.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2012.
  41. Minuchin, S. (1977). Familie und Familientherapie. Freiburg: Lambertus.Google Scholar
  42. Minuchin, S., Baker, L., Rosman, R., Liebman, R., Milman, L., & Todd, T. (1975). A conceptual model of psychosomatic illness in children: Family organization and family therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32(8), 1031–1038.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poněšický, J. (2008). Fenomén mužství a ženství: Psychologie muže a ženy, rozdíly a vztahy. Praha: Triton.Google Scholar
  44. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  45. Reid, S., Wessely, S., Crayford, T., & Hotopf, M. (2001). Medically unexplained symptoms in frequent attendees of secondary health care: Retrospective Cohort Study. British Medical Journal, 322, 767–769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reif, W., Hessel, A., & Braehler, E. (2001). Somatisation symptoms and hypochondriacal features in the general population. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(4), 595–602.Google Scholar
  47. Rivett, M., & Street, E. (2009). Family therapy: 100 key points and techniques. Hove: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Salmon, P., Dowrick, C. F., Ring, A., & Humphris, G. M. (2004). Voiced but unheard agendas: Qualitative analysis of the psychosocial cues that patients with unexplained symptoms present to general practitioners. The British Journal of General Practice, 54(500), 171–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Schore, A. (2001). The effects of early relational trauma on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1–2), 201–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schultz-Hall, J. (2001). Gender issues and family therapy. (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  51. Skorunka, D. (2010). Narativita a psychoterapie. In Z. Vybíral & J. Roubal (Eds.), Současná psychoterapie (pp. 561–583). Praha: Portál.Google Scholar
  52. Skorunka, D. (2011). Psychoterapeutický přístup v medicíně. Praktický lékař, 91(12), 718–722.Google Scholar
  53. Stone, J., Colyer, M., Feltbower, S., Carson, A., & Sharpe, M. (2004). Psychosomatic: A systematic review of its meaning in newspaper articles. Psychosomatics: Journal of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, 45(4), 287–290. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.45.4.287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Suess, G. J., Grossman, K., & Sroufe, L. A. (1992). Effects of infant attachment to mother and father on quality of adaptation in preschool: From dyadic to individual organization of self. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15(1), 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Šulová, L. (2005). Raný psychický vývoj. Praha: Nakladatelství Karolinum.Google Scholar
  56. Trapková, L., & Chvála, V. (2000). Soubor pacientů s poruchami přijmu potravy na našich pracovištích za posledních pět let. Praktický lékař, 80(9), 519–524.Google Scholar
  57. Trapková, L., & Chvála, V. (2004). Rodinná terapie psychosomatických poruch. Praha: Portál.Google Scholar
  58. Verschueren, K., & Marcoen, A. (1999). Representation of self and socioemotional competence in kindergartens: Differential and combined effects of attachment to mother and to father. Child Development, 70(1), 183–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Von Schlippe, A. (2001). Talking about asthma: The semantic environments of physical illness. Families, Systems and Health, 19(3), 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  61. Wilson, C. A., & Oswald, A. J. (2005). How does marriage affect physical and psychological health: A survey of the longitudinal evidence. IZA Discussion Papers, 1619. Bonn: Institute of the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladislav Chvála
    • 1
  • Ludmila Trapková
    • 2
  • David Skorunka
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.The Centre for Complex Therapy of Psychosomatic Disorders, The Institute of Family Therapy and Psychosomatic MedicineLiberec 10Czech Republic
  2. 2.Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Outpatient ClinicPrague 7Czech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of MedicineCharles UniversityHradec KraloveCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations