Advertisement

Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 173–191 | Cite as

Dating is Hard Work: A Narrative Approach to Understanding Sexual and Romantic Relationships in Young Adulthood

  • Jamie E. BankerEmail author
  • Christine E. Kaestle
  • Katherine R. Allen
Original Paper

Abstract

This study utilized a qualitative approach informed by a narrative perspective to examine 57 young adults’ stories about sexual and romantic relationships. Participants (25 men and 32 women) were asked to define relationships in terms of how they know they are in a romantic or a sexual partnership. Young adults identified the language they use for different types of relationships, their perceptions of the hierarchy of romantic and sexual relationships, and their confusion or uncertainty about their relationship experiences. We discuss implications for clinicians working with young adults and provide suggestions for re-storying the confusing territory of intimate (and sometimes impersonal) interaction.

Keywords

Narrative therapy Sexual relationships Romantic relationships Young adults 

References

  1. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1998). Qualitative research in education (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cantor, N., Acker, M., & Cook-Flanagan, C. (1992). Conflict and preoccupation in the intimacy life task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 644–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter, L. M. (2002). Gender and the meaning and experience of virginity loss in the contemporary United States. Gender & Society, 16, 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, H. (2004). The long sexual revolution: English women, sex, and contraception, 1800–1975. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cottrell, D., & Boston, P. (2002). Practitioner review: The effectiveness of systemic family therapy for children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 573–586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, J., & Dittmar, H. (1995). The functions of clothes and clothing (dis)satisfaction: A gender analysis among British students. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18, 237–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Eshbaugh, E. M., & Gute, G. (2008). Hookups and sexual regret among college women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 77–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Freedman, J., & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Furman, W., & Hand, L. S. (2006). The slippery nature of romantic relationships: Issues in definition and differentiation. In A. C. Crouter & A. Booth (Eds.), Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities (pp. 171–178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Gute, G., & Eshbaugh, E. M. (2008). Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students. Journal of Community Health Nursing, http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t775648098~db=all~tab=issueslist~branches=25-v2525,26-43.
  14. Hampel, A. D., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2008). Commitment expectation in romantic relationships: Application of a prototype interaction-pattern model. Personal Relationships, 15, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education (3rd ed.). New York: McKay.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing realities: An art of lenses. Family Process, 29, 1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. London: Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women’s talk about heterosexuality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 113–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Karremans, J. C., & Verwijmeren, T. (2008). Mimicking attractive opposite-sex others: The role of romantic relationship status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 939–950.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and booking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lau, R. R., Quadrel, M. J., & Hartman, K. A. (1990). Development and change of young adults’ preventive health beliefs and behavior: Influence from parents and peers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 240–259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Leach, E. (1964). Anthropological aspects of language: Animal categories and verbal abuse. In E. H. Lenneberg (Ed.), New directions in the study of language (pp. 23–63). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lees, S. (1993). Sugar and spice: Sexuality and adolescent girls. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Mongeau, P. A., Jacobsen, J., & Donnerstein, C. (2007). Defining dates and first date goals: Generalizing from undergraduates to single adults. Communication Research, 34, 526–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Monk, G., Winslade, J., Crocket, K., & Epston, D. (Eds.). (1997). Narrative therapy in practice: The archaeology of hope. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Montgomery, M. J., & Sorell, G. T. (1998). Love and dating experiences in early and middle adolescence: Grade and gender comparisons. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 677–689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Muntigl, P. (2004). Ontogenesis in narrative therapy: A linguistic-semiotic examination of client change. Family Process, 43, 109–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Patrick, M. E., Maggs, J. L., & Abar, C. C. (2007). Reasons to have sex, personal goals, and sexual behavior during the transition to college. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 240–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(2), 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reinisch, J. M., & Beasley, R. (1990). The Kinsey Institute new report on sex: What you must know to be sexually literate. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  33. Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. (2002). After the sexual revolution: Gender politics in teen dating. Contexts, 1, 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shulman, S., & Kipnis, O. (2001). Adolescent romantic relationships: A look from the future. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 337–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shulman, S., & Scharf, M. (2000). Adolescent romantic behaviors and perceptions: Age- and gender related differences, and links with family and peer relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stone, M. (1998). Journaling with clients. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 45, 435–545.Google Scholar
  37. Surra, C. A., Boettcher-Burke, T. M. J., Cottle, N. R., West, A. R., & Gray, C. R. (2007). The treatment of relationship status in research on dating and mate selection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor, J. R. (1989). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Walsh, W. M., & Keenan, R. (1997). Narrative family therapy. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 5, 332–336.Google Scholar
  41. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2002). The development of romantic relationships and adaptations in the system of peer relationships. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 216–225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamie E. Banker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christine E. Kaestle
    • 2
  • Katherine R. Allen
    • 3
  1. 1.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations