Skip to main content
Log in

The Assessment of Marital Adjustment with Muslim Populations: A Reliability Study of the Locke–Wallace Marital Adjustment Test

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Muslim population is growing rapidly throughout the world and a sizable population of 6–8 million Muslims is estimated in North America alone. This population deals with a vast array of issues, including marital adjustment. Nevertheless, the marriage and family literature lacks the research needed to facilitate therapeutic treatment with Muslim couples adequately. Marital adjustment assessments that are commonly utilized have been tested on predominantly Anglo-American or Caucasian couples. The present study is a preliminary investigation of the Locke–Wallace marital adjustment test’s (LWMAT) reliability when administered to married, Muslim-American people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-sawy, S. (1991). Introduction to the principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Al-Istiqamah, 3(1), 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M., Bagherinia, G., Juhari, R., Himelright, J., & Mouton-Sanders, M. (2000). Contemporary Muslim families: Research and practice. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 22(1), 67. doi:10.1023/A:1007770532624. Retrieved 9 December 2007 from Academic Search Complete database.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Tanaka, N., Uji, M., Hiramura, H., & Shikai, N. (2007). The role of personalities in the marital adjustment of Japanese couples. Social Behavior and Personality, 35(4), 561–572. doi:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.4.561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisiloglu, H., & Demir, A. (2000). Applicability of the dyadic adjustment scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 214–218. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.16.3.214. Retrieved 6 December 2007 from PsycARTICLES database.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S., Follingstad, D., & Sullivan, J. (1979). Assessment of marital satisfaction and interaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47(4), 789–791. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.47.4.789. Retrieved 6 December 2007 from PsycARTICLES database.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoult, T. F. (1969). The dictionary of modern society. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. A. (1978). The effect of item weighting on the Locke–Wallace marital adjustment scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 249–256. doi:10.2307/350756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, H. (1998). Married life in Islam: The nature and intimacy of the husband-wife relationship. Retrieved 13 February 2009 from About.com: Islam Website: http://islam.about.com.

  • Krokoff, J. L. (1989). Predictive validation of a telephone version of the Locke–Wallace marital adjustment test. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(3), 767–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. N., & Dollahite, D. C. (2006). How religiosity helps couples prevent, resolve, and overcome marital conflict. Family Relations, 55, 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeMasters, E. E. (1957). Modern courtship and marriage. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H., & Wallace, K. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage & Family Living, 21(3), 251. Retrieved 6 December 2007, from SocINDEX with Full Text database.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M., Cormier, S. L., & Cormier, W. H. (1988). Relation between coping strategies and distress, stress, and marital adjustment of multiple-role women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35(2), 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., & Lee, Y. (2004). Issues of language and culture in family therapy training. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 26(3), 307–318. Retrieved 9 September 2007, from Academic Search Complete database.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman, T., & Dziegielewski, S. (2003). Women who choose Islam. International Journal of Mental Health, 32(3), 31–49. Retrieved 6 December 2007, from Academic Search Complete database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (2002). The polls-review: The Muslim population of the United States: The methodology of estimates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 404–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. (1973). Whose marital adjustment? A research note. Sociological Inquiry, 43(1), 95–96. Retrieved 6 December 2007, from Academic Search Complete database.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. J., Yoshioka, M. R., & Ager, R. D. (1994). Life distress inventory. In J. Fischer & K. Corcoran (Eds.), Measures of clinical practice: A sourcebook (2nd ed., p. 267). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying, Y. (1991). Marital satisfaction among San Francisco Chinese-Americans. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 37(3), 201–213. Retrieved 6 December 2007, from PsycINFO database.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka, M., & Shibusawa, T. (2002). The life distress inventory: A psychometric evaluation. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(6), 752. Retrieved 6 December 2007, from Academic Search Complete database.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afshana Haque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haque, A., Davenport, B. The Assessment of Marital Adjustment with Muslim Populations: A Reliability Study of the Locke–Wallace Marital Adjustment Test. Contemp Fam Ther 31, 160–168 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-009-9087-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-009-9087-5

Keywords

Navigation