Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 183–198

A Test of Contextual Theory: The Relationship Among Relational Ethics, Marital Satisfaction, Health Problems, and Depression

  • Heath A. Grames
  • Richard B. Miller
  • W. David Robinson
  • Derrel J. Higgins
  • W. Jeff Hinton
Original Paper

Abstract

Few studies have examined the theoretical underpinning of contextual theory. Using structural equation modeling, the relationship among relational ethics (recognized as the most important aspect of contextual theory), marital satisfaction, depression, and illness was examined. Data came from a national sample of 632 mid-life, married individuals. Results supported Nagy’s contextual theory. The total score of the Relational Ethics Scale was a significant predictor of marital satisfaction, and marital satisfaction was significantly associated with depression and health problems. Vertical and horizontal subscales of relational ethics also were significant predictors of depression and health problems through the mediating variable of marital satisfaction.

Keywords

Contextual theory Relational ethics Marital satisfaction Depression Health 

References

  1. Anderson, W. T., & Hargrave, T. D. (1990). Contextual family therapy and older people: Building trust in the intergenerational family. Journal of Family Therapy, 12, 311–320. doi:10.1046/j.1990.00399.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  3. Beach, S. R. H., Katz, J., Kim, S., & Brody, G. H. (2003). Prospective effects of marital satisfaction on depressive symptoms in established marriages: A dyadic model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 355–371. doi:10.1177/0265407503020003005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernal, G., Flores-Ortiz, Y., Rodriguez, C., Sorensen, J. L., & Diamond, G. (1990). Development of a contextual family therapy therapist action index. Journal of Family Psychology, 3, 322–331. doi:10.1037/h0080540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bookwala, J. (2005). The role of marital quality in physical health during the mature years. Journal of Aging and Health, 17, 85–104. doi:10.1177/0898264304272794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. (1987). Foundations of contextual therapy: Collected papers of Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy, MD. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  7. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., Grunebaum, J., & Ulrich, D. (1991). Contextual therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (Vol. II, pp. 200–238). Bristol: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  8. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Krasner, B. R. (1986). Between give and take: A clinical guide to contextual therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  9. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. M. (1984). Invisible loyalties. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  10. Burke, J. N. (1999). The ledger of merits: A tool for measurement. Unpublished dissertation, Widener University.Google Scholar
  11. Burr, W. R. (1970). Satisfaction with various aspects of marriage over the life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 29–37. doi:10.2307/349968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Busby, D. M., Crane, D. R., Larson, J. H., & Christensen, C. (1995). A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 289–308. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, T. L. (2003). The effectiveness of family interventions for physical disorders. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 263–282. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01204.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choi, H., & Marks, N. F. (2008). Marital conflict, depressive symptoms, and functional impairment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70, 377–390. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00488.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coyne, J. C., Rohrbaugh, M. J., Shoham, V., Sonnega, J. S., Nicklas, J. M., & Cranford, J. A. (2001). Prognostic importance of marital quality for survival of congestive heart failure. The American Journal of Cardiology, 88, 526–529. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01731-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dankoski, M. E., & Deacon, S. A. (2000). Using a feminist lens in contextual therapy. Family Process, 39, 51–66. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2000.39107.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diamond, G., Bernal, G., & Flores-Ortiz, Y. (1991). Engagement and recruitment for family therapy research in community settings. Contemporary Family Therapy, 13, 255–274. doi:10.1007/BF00891805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Dillman, D. A., Lesser, V., Mason, R., Carlson, J., Willits, F., Robertson, R., et al. (2007). Personalization of mail surveys for general public and populations with a group identity: Results from nine studies. Rural Sociology, 72, 632–646. doi:10.1526/003601107782638693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferraro, K. F., & Farmer, M. M. (1999). Utility of health data from social surveys: Is there a gold standard for measuring morbidity? American Sociological Review, 64, 303–315. doi:10.2307/2657534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., Harold, G. T., & Osborne, L. N. (1997). Marital satisfaction and depression: Different causal relationships for men and women? Psychological Science, 8, 351–357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00424.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldenthal, P. (1993). Contextual family therapy: Assessment and intervention procedures. Florida: Professional Resources Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goldenthal, P. (1996). Doing contextual therapy. New York: Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Goodwin, S. S. (1997). The marital relationship and health in women with chronic fatigue and immune dysfunction syndrome: Views of wives and husbands. Nursing Research, 46, 138–146. doi:10.1097/00006199-199705000-00004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grunebaum, J. (1987). Multidirected partiality and the “parental imperative”. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 24, 646–656. doi:10.1037/h0085763.Google Scholar
  27. Hargrave, T. D., & Anderson, W. (1990). Helping older people finish well: A contextual family therapy approach. Family Therapy, 17, 9–19.Google Scholar
  28. Hargrave, T. D., & Bomba, A. K. (1993). Further validation of the Relational Ethics Scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19, 292–299. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1993.tb00990.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hargrave, T. D., & Hanna, S. M. (1997). The aging family: New visions in theory, practice and reality. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  30. Hargrave, T. D., Jennings, G., & Anderson, W. (1991). The development of a relational ethics scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 145–158. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1991.tb00877.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hargrave, T. D., & Pfitzer, F. (2003). The new contextual therapy: Guiding the power of give and take. New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hargrave, T. D., & Sells, J. N. (1997). The development of a forgiveness scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23, 41–62. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb00230.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hawkins, D. N., & Booth, A. (2005). Unhappily ever after: Effects of long-term, low quality marriages on well-being. Social Forces, 84, 445–465. doi:10.1353/sof.2005.0103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hibbard, J. H., & Pope, C. R. (1993). The quality of social roles as predictors of morbidity and mortality. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 217–225. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90005-O.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holman, T. B., Larson, J. H., & Olsen, J. A. (2001). Individual characteristic influencing marital quality. In T. B. Holman (Ed.), Premarital prediction of marital quality or breakup: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 105–117). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jones, S., & Flickinger, M. A. (1987). Contextual family therapy for families with an impaired elderly member: A case study. Clinical Gerontologist, 6, 87–97. doi:10.1300/J018v06n02_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2003). Lisrel 8.54 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  40. Kahn, J. R., & Fazio, E. M. (2005). Economic status over the life course and racial disparities in health. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 60B, 76–84.Google Scholar
  41. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kohout, F. J., Berkman, L. F., Evans, D. A., & Cononi-Huntley, J. (1993). Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index. Journal of Aging and Health, 5, 179–193. doi:10.1177/089826439300500202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee, R. E. (1995). Availability to peer group treatment in residential care as a function of relational ethics. Contemporary Family Therapy, 17, 343–348. doi:10.1007/BF02252671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Medalie, J. H., & Goldbourt, U. (1976). Angina pectoris among 10,000 men: Psychosocial and other risk factors as evidenced by a multivariate analysis of a five year incidence study. The American Journal of Medicine, 60, 910–921. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(76)90921-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller, R. B. (2000). Misconceptions about the u-shaped curve of marital satisfaction over the life course. Family Science Review, 13, 60–73.Google Scholar
  47. Miller, R. B., Johnson, L. N., Sandberg, J. G., Stringer-Siebold, T. A., & Gfeller-Strouts, L. (2000). An addendum to the 1997 outcome research chart. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 347–354. doi:10.1080/019261800437900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moon, M. S. (2000). A pastoral theology of caring in Korea: Contributions from marriage and family therapy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.Google Scholar
  49. Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (2001). Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  50. Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (2008). Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  51. Orth-Gomer, K., Wamala, S. P., Horsten, M., Schenck-Gustafsson, K., Schneiderman, N., & Mittleman, M. A. (2000). Marital stress worsens prognosis in women with coronary heart disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 3008–3012. doi:10.1001/jama.284.23.3008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pollard, M. W., Anderson, R. A., Anderson, W. T., & Jennings, G. (1998). The development of a family forgiveness scale. Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 95–109. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Radloff, L. S., & Teri, L. (1986). Use of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale with older adults. Clinical Gerontologist, 5, 119–136. doi:10.1300/J018v05n01_06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rodrigue, J. R., & Park, T. L. (1996). General and illness specific adjustment to cancer: Relationship to marital status and marital quality. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 40, 29–36. doi:10.1016/0022-3999(95)00540-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sandberg, J. G., Miller, R. B., Harper, J. H., Robila, M., & Davey, A. The Relationship Among Marital Quality, Health, and Health Care Utilization in Older Couples. Journal of Health Psychology (in press).Google Scholar
  57. Shokouhi-Behnam, S., Chambliss, C. A., & Caruso, K. A. (1997). Cross-cultural applicability of contextual family therapy: Iranian and American college students’ perceptions of familial and peer relationships. Psychological Reports, 80, 691–694.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28. doi:10.2307/350547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stokes, S. B. (2003). Adolescent understanding of father absence: A qualitative inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.Google Scholar
  60. Thompson, J. M., Whiffen, V. E., & Blain, M. D. (1995). Depressive symptoms, sex, and perceptions of intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 49–66. doi:10.1177/0265407595121004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trief, P. M., Morin, P. C., Izquierdo, R., Teresa, J., Starren, J., Shea, S., et al. (2006). Marital quality and diabetes outcomes: The IDEATel Project. Families, Systems & Health, 24, 318–331. doi:10.1037/1091-7527.24.3.318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2006). You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 1–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. U.S. Census Bureau. (2002, March). Age of reference person, by total income money in 2001, type of family, race, and Hispanic origin of reference person. Accessed 2 July 2003, from CPS Annual Demographic Supplement Online via FERRET: http://ferret.bls.census.gov/macro/032002/faminc/new02_006.htm.
  64. Van Heusden, A., & Van den Eerenbeemt, E. (1987). Balance in motion: Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy and his vision of individual and family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  65. Watson, M. F. (2007). Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy, MD: A testimony to life. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 289–290. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00026.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whisman, M. A. (1999). Marital dissatisfaction and psychiatric disorders: Results from the national comorbidity study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 701–706. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.108.4.701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Whisman, M. A., & Bruce, M. L. (1999). Marital distress and incidence of major depressive episode in a community sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 674–678. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.108.4.674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whyte, M. K. (1990). Dating, mating, and marriage. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  69. Wickrama, K., Conger, R. D., Lorenz, F. O., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (1997). Marital quality and physical illness: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 143–155. doi:10.2307/353668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Williams, K. (2003). Has the future of marriage arrived? A contemporary examination of gender, marriage, and psychological well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 470–487. doi:10.2307/1519794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zeo, G. A. (2001). The role of the clinical psychologist in ethno-political conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Immaculata College.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heath A. Grames
    • 1
  • Richard B. Miller
    • 2
  • W. David Robinson
    • 3
  • Derrel J. Higgins
    • 4
  • W. Jeff Hinton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Child and Family Studies, Marriage and Family Therapy ProgramUniversity of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA
  2. 2.School of Family LifeBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyMesa Community CollegeMesaUSA

Personalised recommendations