Advertisement

Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 139–162 | Cite as

Vulnerability schemas of individuals in couples relationships: a cognitive perspective

  • Terje Tilden
  • Frank M. Dattilio
Article

Abstract

The professional literature has recently given attention to addressing individual schemas in couples’ relationships, with particular emphasis on the fact that individual vulnerability has a significant impact on couples’ relationships. This article addresses how this vulnerability can be restructured during the course of couples’ therapy. Case vignettes are used to illustrate how the model can be applied. Some of the implications of this model are considered in the discussion section.

Keywords

vulnerability schemas cognitive behavioral therapy couple therapy systemic perspectives 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, T. 1994Reflecting processes: Conversations and conversations about the conversationDansk psykologisk forlagCopenhagen[Danish]Google Scholar
  2. Baucom, D. H. 1987Attributions in distressed relations: How can we explain themDuck, S.Perlman, D. eds. Heterosexual relations marriage and divorceSageLondon177206Google Scholar
  3. Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N. 1990Cognitive-behavioral marital therapyBrunner/MazelNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Rankin, L. A., Burnett, C. K. 1996Assessing relationship standards: The Inventory of Specific Relationship StandardsJournal of Family Psychology107288Google Scholar
  5. Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Sayers, S., Sher, T. G. 1989The role of cognitions in marital relationships: Definitional, methodological, and conceptual issuesJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology573138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baucom, D. H., Shoham, V., Mueser, K. T., Daiuto, A. D., Stickle, T. R. 1998Empirically supported couples and family therapies for adult problemsJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology665388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck, J. S. 1995Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyondGuilford PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck, A. T. 1988Love is never enoughHarper & RowNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., Emery, G. 1979Cognitive therapy of depressionGuilford PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D. 1990Attributions in marriage: Review and critiquesPsychological Bulletin107333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Christensen, A. 1988Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couplesNoller, P.Fitzpatrick, M. A. eds. Perspectives on marital interactionMultilingual MattersClevedon, England3152Google Scholar
  12. Dattilio, F. M. 1989A guide to cognitive marital therapyKeller, P. A.Heyman, S. R. eds. Innovations in clinical practice: A source bookProfessional Resource ExchangeSarasota, FL2742Google Scholar
  13. Dattilio, F. M. eds. 1998Case studies in couple and family therapy: Systemic and cognitive perspectivesGuilford PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Dattilio, F. M., Padesky, C. A. 1990Cognitive therapy with couplesProfessional Resource ExchangeSarasota, FLGoogle Scholar
  15. d’Elia, G. 2000Cognitive psychotherapy: A cooperation project with the patientSvenska föreningen för psykisk hälsaStockholm[Swedish]Google Scholar
  16. Dicks, H. 1953Experiences with marital tension seen in the psychological clinic in “Clinical studies in marriage and the family: A symposium on methods.”British Journal of Medical Psychology26181196Google Scholar
  17. Ekeland, T. J. 1997Couple conflicts—an attribution theoretical analysisFokus på familien251024[Norwegian]Google Scholar
  18. Ellis, A. 1977The nature of disturbed marital interactionsEllis, A.Grieger, R. eds. Handbook of rational-emotive therapySpringerNew York170176Google Scholar
  19. Ellis, A., Harper, R. A. 1961A guide to rational livingPrentice-HallEnglewood Clips, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellis, A., Sichel, J. L., Yeager, R. J., DiMattia, D. J., DiGiuseppe, R. 1989Rational-emotive couples therapyPergamon PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Epstein, N. 1982Cognitive therapy with couplesAmerican Journal of Family Therapy10516Google Scholar
  22. Epstein, N. 1992Marital therapyFreeman, A.Dattilio, F. M. eds. Comprehensive casebook of cognitive therapyPlenum PressNew York267275Google Scholar
  23. Epstein, N., Baucom, D. H. 1989Cognitive-behavioral marital therapyFreeman, A.Simon, K. M.Beutler, L. E.Arkowitz, H. eds. Comprehensive handbook of cognitive therapyPlenum PressNew York491513Google Scholar
  24. Epstein, N., Baucom, D. H. 2002Enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for couples: A contextual approachAmerican Psychological AssociationWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Epstein, N., Eidelson, R. J. 1981Unrealistic beliefs of clinical couples: Their relationship to expectations, goals and satisfactionAmerican Journal of Family Therapy9322Google Scholar
  26. Falloon, I. R. H., Boyd, J. L., McGill, C. W. 1984Family care of schizophreniaGuilford PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., Nelson, G. 1987Attribution processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 3. Causal and responsibility attributions for spouse behaviorCognitive Therapy and Research11186Google Scholar
  28. Goldenberg, I., Goldenberg, H. 2000Family therapy: An overviewBrooks/ColeBelmont, CAGoogle Scholar
  29. Gottman, J. M. 1994What predicts divorce?Lawrence ErlbaumHillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  30. Haley, J., Hoffman, L. 1968Techniques of family therapyBasic BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffart, A. 1999From emotion through cognitions towards schema positions: A schema model applied to psychiatric problems and psychotherapyAxelsen, E. D.Hartmann, E. eds. Roads to change Working factors in psychotherapy]Cappelen Akademisk ForlagOslo148163[Norwegian]Google Scholar
  32. Jacobson, N. S., Margolin, G. 1979Marital therapy: Strategies based on social learning and behavior exchange principlesBrunner/MazelNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Jind, L. 2000Can the perception of traumatic events result in cognitive schema changes? A critical review through the empiric literatureNordisk Psykologi52115134[Danish]Google Scholar
  34. Johnsen, A. (2000). Perception of self, key metaphors and family premises. The relationship between individual and joint histories. In A. Johnsen, R. Sundet, & V. W. Torsteinsson, (Eds.), Interplay and perception of self—new roads in relation-oriented therapies (pp. 108–121). Oslo: Tano Aschehoug [Norwegian]Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, S. M., Denton, W. 2002Emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating secure connectionsGurman, A. S.Jacobson, N. S. eds. Clinical handbook of couple therapy3Guilford PressNew York221250Google Scholar
  36. Jones, E. 1995Family therapy in a systemic perspective. Developing tendencies in systemic therapy after the Milan methodDansk Psykologisk forlagCopenhagen[Norwegian]Google Scholar
  37. Kelly, G. 1995The psychology of personal constructsNortonNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Leahy, R. 1996Cognitive therapy: Basic principles and applicationsJason AronsonNorthvale, NJGoogle Scholar
  39. Liberman, R. P. 1970Behavioral approaches to couple and family therapyAmerican Journal of Orthopsychiatry40106118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lundby, G. 1998Histories and therapyTano AschehougOslo[Norwegian]Google Scholar
  41. Margolin, G., Weiss, R. L. 1978Comparative evaluation of therapeutic components associated with behavioral marital treatmentsJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology4614761486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Markman, H., Stanley, S., Blumberg, S. L. 2000Living togetherDamm forlagOslo[Norwegian]Google Scholar
  43. Nichols, M. P., Schwartz, R. C. 2001Family therapy: Concepts and methodsFifthAllyn and BaconBostonGoogle Scholar
  44. Nordby, T. T. 1998Affects and thoughts, person and system. Emotions and cognition in individual and relational processes in couple and family therapyFokus på familien26213223[Norwegian]Google Scholar
  45. Nordby, T. T. (2002). Cognitive couple therapy, a way of acknowledging the role of vulnerability in the relationship. Fokus på familien, 30, 46–60. Oslo [Norwegian]Google Scholar
  46. Patterson, G. R. 1971Families: Applications of social learning to family lifeResearch PressChampaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  47. Patterson, G. R., McNeal, S., Hawkins, N., Phelps, R. 1967Reprogramming the social environmentJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry8181195Google Scholar
  48. Rathus, J. H., Sanderson, W. C. 1999Marital distress: Cognitive behavioral interventions for couplesJason AronsonNorthvale, NJGoogle Scholar
  49. Satir, V. 1967Conjoint family therapyScience & Behavioral BooksPalo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  50. Stuart, R. B. 1969Operant-interpersonal treatment for marital discordJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology33675682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stuart, R. B. 1980Helping couples change: A social learning approach to marital therapyGuilford PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Sundet, R. (2000). Contradictions and dilemmas. Notions about therapy in the crossroads of psychoanalysis and family therapy. In A. Johnsen, R. Sundet, & V.W. Torsteinsson (Eds.), Interplay and perception of self—new roads in relation-oriented therapies (pp. 181–197). Oslo: Tano Aschehoug [Norwegian]Google Scholar
  53. Thibaut, J. W., Kelley, H. H. 1959The social psychology of groupsWileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Weiss, R. L. 1984Cognitive and strategic interventions in behavioral marital therapyHahlweg, K.Jacobson, N. S. eds. Marital interaction: Analysis and modificationGuilford PressNew York309324Google Scholar
  55. Weiss, R. L., Hops, H., Patterson, G. R. 1973A framework for conceptualizing marital conflict, a technology for altering it, some data for evaluating itHamerlynck, L. A.Handy, L. C.Mash, E. J. eds. Behavior change: Methodology, concepts, and practiceResearch PressChampaign, IL309342Google Scholar
  56. Welburn, K. R., Dagg, P., Coristine, M., Pontefract, A. 2000Schematic change as a result of an intensive group-therapy day-treatment programPsychotherapy37189195Google Scholar
  57. Young, J., Gluhoski, V. 1997A schema-focused perspective on satisfaction in close relationshipsSternberg, R. J.Hojjat, M. eds. Satisfaction in close relationshipsGuilford PressNew York356381Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Family Therapy DepartmentModum Bad VikersundNorway
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical SchoolCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations