Advertisement

Machine Translation

, Volume 30, Issue 1–2, pp 111–115 | Cite as

New directions in empirical translation process research exploring the CRITT TPR-DB

Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016, ISBN: 978-3-319-20357-7, v + 315 pp.
  • Miquel Esplà-Gomis
Book Review
  • 255 Downloads

New Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research (Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB), edited by Michael Carl, Srinivas Bangalore, and Moritz Chaeffer, is a book consisting of a compilation of 13 scientific articles (plus a chapter for the introduction) that share one common feature: all of them revolve around the Translation Process Research Database1(TPR-DB) published by the Centre for Research and Innovation in Translation and Translation Technology (CRITT). This book collects a series of empirical studies of human translator behaviour based on the transparent capture of activity information during a translation session—such as eye tracking, key logging, time spent in a translation task, etc.—and how this information can be used to extract conclusions regarding a given translation task, the translation technologies used, and the behaviour of the translators participating in the task. The book is divided in three parts: a first part that describes the TPR-DB, a second part that...

References

  1. Alabau V, Bonk R, Buck C, Carl M, Casacuberta F, García-Martínez M, González J, Koehn P, Leiva L, Mesa-Lao B, Ortiz D, Saint-Amand H, Sanchis G, Tsoukala C (2013) CASMACAT: an open source workbench for advanced computer aided translation. Prague Bull Math Linguist 100:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carl M (2012) Translog-II: a program for recording user activity data for empirical reading and writing research. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on language resources and evaluation. Istanbul, Turkey, pp 4108–4112Google Scholar
  3. Halliday MAK, Hasan R (2014) Cohesion in English. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Rabiner LR (1989) A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE 77(2):257–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Settles B (2010) Active learning literature survey. University of Wisconsin–Madison, Computer Sciences Technical Report No, Tech. Rep. 1648Google Scholar
  6. Shalev-Shwartz S (2012) Online learning and online convex optimization. Found Trends Mach Learn 4(2):107–194CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes InformàticsUniversitat d’AlacantAlacantSpain

Personalised recommendations