Advertisement

A global hybrid derivative-free method for high-dimensional systems of nonlinear equations

  • Rodolfo G. BegiatoEmail author
  • Ana L. Custódio
  • Márcia A. Gomes-Ruggiero
Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

This work concerns the numerical solution of high-dimensional systems of nonlinear equations, when derivatives are not available for use, but assuming that all functions defining the problem are continuously differentiable. A hybrid approach is taken, based on a derivative-free iterative method, organized in two phases. The first phase is defined by derivative-free versions of a fixed-point method that employs spectral parameters to define the steplength along the residual direction. The second phase consists on a matrix-free inexact Newton method that employs the Generalized Minimal Residual algorithm to solve the linear system that computes the search direction. This second phase will only take place if the first one fails to find a better point after a predefined number of reductions in the step size. In all stages, the criterion to accept a new point considers a nonmonotone decrease condition upon a merit function. Convergence results are established and the numerical performance is assessed through experiments in a set of problems collected from the literature. Both the theoretical and the experimental analysis support the feasibility of the proposed hybrid strategy.

Keywords

Nonlinear systems of equations Derivative-free optimization methods Spectral residual Inexact Newton Nonmonotone line search 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Sandra Augusta Santos, from University of Campinas, Brazil, for suggestions and valuable discussions on the subject, which greatly helped us to improve the paper. We also acknowledge the suggestions of two anonymous referees, which greatly contributed for the paper organization.

References

  1. 1.
    Armijo, L.: Minimization of functions having Lipschitz continuous first partial derivatives. Pac. J. Math. 16, 1–3 (1966)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barzilai, J., Borwein, J.M.: Two-point step size gradient methods. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 8, 141–148 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chamberlain, R.M., Powell, M.J.D., Lemarechal, C., Pedersen, H.C.: The watchdog technique for forcing convergence in algorithms for constrained optimization. In: Buckley, A.G., Goffin, J.L. (eds.) Algorithms for Constrained Minimization of Smooth Nonlinear Functions. Mathematical Programming Studies, vol. 16, pp. 1–17. Springer, Berlin (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dembo, R.S., Eisenstat, S.C., Steihaug, T.: Inexact Newton methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 19, 400–408 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dolan, E.D., Moré, J.J.: Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math. Program. 91, 201–213 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eisenstat, S.C., Walker, H.F.: Choosing the forcing terms in an inexact-Newton method. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 17, 16–32 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grippo, L., Lampariello, F., Lucidi, S.: A nonmonotone line search technique for Newton’s method. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 23, 707–716 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grippo, L., Sciandrone, M.: Nonmonotone derivative-free methods for nonlinear equations. Comput. Optim. Appl. 37, 297–328 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grippo, L., Sciandrone, M.: Nonmonotone globalization of the finite-difference Newton-GMRES method for nonlinear equations. Optim. Methods Softw. 25, 971–999 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kelley, C.T.: Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations. SIAM, Philadelphia (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    La Cruz, W., Martínez, J.M., Raydan, M.: Spectral residual method without gradient information for solving large-scale nonlinear systems of equations. Math. Comput. 75, 1429–1448 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    La Cruz, W., Raydan, M.: Nonmonotone spectral methods for large-scale nonlinear systems. Optim. Methods Softw. 18, 583–599 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, D.H., Fukushima, M.: A derivative-free line search and global convergence of Broyden-like method for nonlinear equations. Optim. Methods Softw. 13, 181–201 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lukšan, L., Vlček, J.: Sparse and partially separable test problems for unconstrained and equality constrained optimization. Report V-767, ICS AS CR, Prague (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saad, Y., Schultz, M.H.: GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7, 856–869 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DAMATUTFPRCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsFCT-UNL-CMACaparicaPortugal
  3. 3.Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, IMECCUNICAMPCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations