Advertisement

A sub-additive DC approach to the complementarity problem

  • L. Abdallah
  • M. Haddou
  • T. MigotEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this article, we study a merit function based on sub-additive functions for solving the non-linear complementarity problem (NCP). This leads to consider an optimization problem that is equivalent to the NCP. In the case of a concave NCP this optimization problem is a Difference of Convex (DC) program and we can therefore use DC Algorithm to locally solve it. We prove that in the case of a concave monotone NCP, it is sufficient to compute a stationary point of the optimization problem to obtain a solution of the complementarity problem. In the case of a general NCP, assuming that a DC decomposition of the complementarity problem is known, we propose a penalization technique to reformulate the optimization problem as a DC program and prove that local minima of this penalized problem are also local minima of the merit problem. Numerical results on linear complementarity problems, absolute value equations and non-linear complementarity problems show that our method is promising.

Keywords

Complementarity problem Difference of convex Merit function DC algorithm 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90C59 90C30 90C33 65K05 49M20 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank anonymous referees for their helpful remarks and comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdallah, L., Haddou, M., Migot, T.: Solving absolute value equation using complementarity and smoothing functions. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 327, 196–207 (2018)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    An, L.T.H., Tao, P.D.: The DC (difference of convex functions) programming and DCA revisited with DC models of real world nonconvex optimization problems. Ann. Oper. Res. 133(1), 23–46 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, C., Mangasarian, O.L.: Smoothing methods for convex inequalities and linear complementarity problems. Math. Program. 71(1), 51–69 (1995)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, C., Mangasarian, O.L.: A class of smoothing functions for nonlinear and mixed complementarity problems. Comput. Optim. Appl. 5(2), 97–138 (1996)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cottle, R.W., Pang, J.-S., Stone, R.E.: The Linear Complementarity Problem. SIAM, Philadelphia (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Luca, T., Facchinei, F., Kanzow, C.: A semismooth equation approach to the solution of nonlinear complementarity problems. Math. Program. 75(3), 407–439 (1996)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Facchinei, F., Pang, J.-S.: Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems. Springer, Berlin (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Facchinei, F., Soares, J.: A new merit function for nonlinear complementarity problems and a related algorithm. SIAM J. Optim. 7(1), 225–247 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischer, A.: Solution of monotone complementarity problems with locally lipschitzian functions. Math. Program. 76(3), 513–532 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Floudas, C.A., Pardalos, P.M., Adjiman, C., Esposito, W.R., Gümüs, Z.H., Harding, S.T., Klepeis, J.L., Meyer, C.A., Schweiger, C.A.: Handbook of Test Problems in Local and Global Optimization, vol. 33. Springer, Berlin (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fukushima, M.: Merit Functions for Variational Inequality and Complementarity Problems, pp. 155–170. Springer, USA (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grant, M., Boyd, S., Ye, Y.: CVX: Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haddou, M., Maheux, P.: Smoothing methods for nonlinear complementarity problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 160(3), 711–729 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, C., Wang, S.: A power penalty approach to a nonlinear complementarity problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 38(1), 72–76 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanzow, C.: Some noninterior continuation methods for linear complementarity problems. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 17(4), 851–868 (1996)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kojima, M., Shindoh, S.: Extensions of Newton and quasi-Newton methods to systems of PC 1 equations. Institute of Technology, Department of Information Sciences (1986)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Le Thi, H.A., Dinh, T.P.: On solving linear complementarity problems by DC programming and DCA. Comput. Optim. Appl. 50(3), 507–524 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mangasarian, O.L.: Absolute value equation solution via concave minimization. Optim. Lett. 1(1), 3–8 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mangasarian, O.L.: Absolute value equation solution via linear programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 161(3), 870–876 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Migot, T., Haddou, M.: A smoothing method for sparse optimization over polyhedral sets. In: Modelling, Computation and Optimization in Information Systems and Management Sciences, pp 369–379. Springer, Berlin (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Qi, L., Sun, D., Zhou, G.: A new look at smoothing newton methods for nonlinear complementarity problems and box constrained variational inequalities. Math. Program. 87(1), 1–35 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Solodov, M.V.: Constraint qualifications. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Wiley, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tao, P.D., Bernoussi, S.E.: Duality in D.C. (Difference of Convex functions) Optimization. Subgradient Methods, pp. 277–293. Birkhäuser Basel, Basel (1988)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tao, P.D., An, L.T.H.: Convex analysis approach to DC programming: theory, algorithms and applications. Acta Math. Vietnam. 22(1), 289–355 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tao, P.D., An, L.T.H.: A DC optimization algorithm for solving the trust-region subproblem. SIAM J. Optim. 8(2), 476–505 (1998)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lebanese UniversityTripoliLebanon
  2. 2.INSA Rennes, CNRS, IRMAR - UMR 6625Univ RennesRennesFrance
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations