Computational Optimization and Applications

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 463–481

Robust portfolio optimization: a conic programming approach

Article

Abstract

The Markowitz Mean Variance model (MMV) and its variants are widely used for portfolio selection. The mean and covariance matrix used in the model originate from probability distributions that need to be determined empirically. It is well known that these parameters are notoriously difficult to estimate. In addition, the model is very sensitive to these parameter estimates. As a result, the performance and composition of MMV portfolios can vary significantly with the specification of the mean and covariance matrix. In order to address this issue we propose a one-period mean-variance model, where the mean and covariance matrix are only assumed to belong to an exogenously specified uncertainty set. The robust mean-variance portfolio selection problem is then written as a conic program that can be solved efficiently with standard solvers. Both second order cone program (SOCP) and semidefinite program (SDP) formulations are discussed. Using numerical experiments with real data we show that the portfolios generated by the proposed robust mean-variance model can be computed efficiently and are not as sensitive to input errors as the classical MMV’s portfolios.

Keywords

Mean variance optimization Robust optimization Conic programming 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004) MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broadie, M.: Computing efficient frontiers using estimated parameters. Ann. Oper. Res. 45, 21–58 (1993) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ceria, S., Stubbs, R.A.: Incorporating estimation errors into portfolio selection: Robust portfolio construction. J. Asset Manag. 7(2), 109–127 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    El Ghaoui, L., Oks, M., Oustry, F.: Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: a conic programming approach. Oper. Res. 51, 543–556 (2003) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldfarb, D., Iyengar, G.: Robust portfolio selection problems. Math. Oper. Res. 28, 1–38 (2003) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuhn, D., Parpas, P., Rustem, B.: Dynamic mean-variance portfolio analysis under model risk. J. Comput. Finance 12, 91–115 (2009) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lasserre, J.B.: Bounds on measures satisfying moment conditions. Ann. Appl. Probab. 12, 1114–1137 (2002) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio selection. J. Finance VII, 77–91 (1952) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Putinar, M.: Positive polynomials on compact semi-algebraic sets. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 42, 969–984 (1993) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rustem, B., Becker, R.G., Marty, W.: Robust min-max portfolio strategies for rival forecast and risk scenarios. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 24(11–12), 1591–1621 (2000) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rustem, B., Howe, M.: Algorithms for Worst-Case Design and Applications to Risk Management. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2002) MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sturm, J.F.: Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optim. Methods Softw. 12–13, 625–653 (1999) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toh, K.C., Todd, M.J., Tütüncü, R.H.: SDPT3-a MATLAB software package for semidefinite programming. Optim. Methods Softw. 11, 545–581 (1999) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tütüncü, R.H., Koenig, M.: Robust asset allocation. Ann. Oper. Res. 132, 157–187 (2004) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zakovic, S., Rustem, B.: Semi-infinite programming and applications to MinMax problems. Ann. Oper. Res. 124, 81–110 (2002) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ComputingImperial CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations