Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 516–537

Post-merger cultural integration from a social network perspective: a computational modeling approach

Manuscript

Abstract

Although cultural integration, or sharing a common corporate culture, is crucial for the success of mergers, previous studies have been limited to firm-level analyses. From a social network perspective, this study explores how cultural integration emerges from the patterns of social interactions among individuals. Using an agent-based model, we investigate the impact of network structures within and between two merging firms on post-merger cultural integration and organizational dysfunctions—individual turnover, interpersonal conflict and organizational communication ineffectiveness—that arise from insufficient cultural integration. The simulation results demonstrate that the highest level of cultural integration is achieved when social ties are more centralized within each merging firm and the social ties between the merging firms are less concentrated on central individuals. Additionally, the results show that within-firm and between-firm network structures significantly affect individual turnover, interpersonal conflict and organizational communication ineffectiveness, and that these three outcome measurements do not vary in tandem.

Keywords

Mergers Cultural integration Social networks Agent-based models Adaptive networks 

References

  1. Allatta JT, Singh H (2011) Evolving communication patterns in response to an acquisition event. Strateg Manag J 32(10):1099–1118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry B, Crant MJ (2000) Dyadic communication relationships in organizations: an attribution/expectancy approach. Organ Sci 11(6):648–664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bearman PS, Moody J, Stovel K (2004) Chains of affection: the structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. Am J Sociol 110(1):44–91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkinshaw JM, Bresman H, Hakanson L (2000) Managing the post-acquisition integration process: how the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. J Manag Stud 37(3):395–426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley S, Sullivan EE (2005) AOL Time Warner, Inc. Harvard Business Publishing, Boston Google Scholar
  6. Braha D, Bar-Yam Y (2006) From centrality to temporary fame: dynamic centrality in complex networks. Complexity 12(2):59–63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braha D, Stacey B, Bar-Yam Y (2011) Corporate competition: a self-organized network. Soc Netw 33:219–230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buono A, Bowditch JL (1989) The human side of mergers and acquisitions: managing collisions between people, cultures and organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Google Scholar
  9. Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  10. Calori R, Lubatkin M, Very P, Veiga J (1997) Modeling the origins of nationally-bound administrative heritages: a historical institutional analysis of French and British firms. Organ Sci 8(6):681–696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carley K (1991) A theory of group stability. Am Sociol Rev 56:331–354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chatterjee L, Lubatkin M, Schweiger D, Weber Y (1992) Cultural differences and shareholder value in related mergers: linking equity and human capital. Strateg Manag J 13(5):319–334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darr ED, Kurtzberg TR (2000) An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82:28–44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. David K, Singh H (1994) Sources of acquisition cultural risk. In: Krogh G, Sinatra A, Singh H (eds) The management of corporate acquisitions. MacMillan & Co., Basingstoke, pp 251–292 Google Scholar
  15. Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad Manag Rev 32(2):480–499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 88(4):741–749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Earley CP, Mosakowski E (2000) Creating hybrid team cultures: an empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad Manag J 43(1):26–49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finkelstein S (2002) The DaimlerChrysler merger. Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College Google Scholar
  19. Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S (2000) A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. J Manag 26(3):463–488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gross T, Blasius B (2008) Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review. J R Soc Interface 5:259–271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gross T, Sayama H (eds) (2009) Adaptive networks: theory, models and applications. Springer, New York Google Scholar
  23. Hagberg AA, Schult DA, Swart PJ (2008) Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In: Varoquaux G, Vaught T, Millman J (eds) Proceedings of the 7th Python in science conference, pp 11–15 Google Scholar
  24. Haleblian J, Devers CE, McNamara G, Carpenter MA, Davison RB (2009) Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: a review and research agenda. J Manag 35(3):469–502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison JR, Lin Z, Carroll GR, Carley KM (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1229–1245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Adm Sci Q 40:256–282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jemison DB, Haspeslagh PC (1991) Managing acquisitions: creating value through corporate renewal. Free Press, New York Google Scholar
  28. Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2010) Organizational social network research: core ideas and key debates. Acad Manag Ann 4:317–357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King DR, Dalton DR, Daily CM, Covin JG (2004) Meta-analysis of post-acquisition performance: indications of unidentified moderators. Strateg Manag J 25:187–200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krackhardt D, Porter LW (1985) When friends leave: a structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers’ attitudes. Adm Sci Q 30(2):242–261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krackhardt D, Porter LW (1986) The snowball effect: turnover embedded in communication networks. J Appl Psychol 71(1):50–55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Larsson R, Lubatkin M (2001) Achieving acculturation in mergers and acquisitions: an international case survey. Hum Relat 54(12):1573–1607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lubatkin M, Schweiger D, Weber Y (1999) Top management turnover in related M&A’s: an additional test of the theory of relative standing. J Manag 25(1):55–73 Google Scholar
  34. Macy MW, Willer R (2002) From factors to actors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annu Rev Sociol 28:143–166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mark NP (2003) Culture and competition: homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. Am Sociol Rev 68(3):319–345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moynihan DP, Pandey SK (2008) The ties that bind: social networks, person-organization value fit, and turnover intention. J Public Adm Res Theory 18:205–227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nahavandi A, Malekzadeh AR (1988) Acculturation in mergers and acquisitions. Acad Manag Rev 13(1):79–90 Google Scholar
  38. O’Reilly CA, Chatman JA (1996) Culture as social control: corporations, cults, and commitment. Res Organ Behav 18:157–200 Google Scholar
  39. O’Reilly CA, Chatman J, Caldwell DF (1991) People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad Manag J 34(3):487–516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rafferty AE, Restubog SLD (2009) The impact of change process and context on change reactions and turnover. J Manag 36(5):1309–1338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramaswamy K (1997) The performance impact of strategic similarity in horizontal mergers: evidence from the US banking industry. Acad Manag J 40(3):697–715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York Google Scholar
  43. Schein EH (1985) Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Google Scholar
  44. Schweiger DM, DeNisi AS (1991) Communication with employees following a merger: a longitudinal field experiment. Acad Manag J 34(1):110–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stahl GK, Voigt A (2008) Do cultural differences matter in mergers and acquisitions? A tentative model and examination. Organ Sci 19(1):160–176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Mannen J, Schein EH (1979) Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Res Organ Behav 1:209–264 Google Scholar
  47. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(4):440–442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weber RA, Camerer CF (2003) Cultural conflict and merger failure: an experimental approach. Manag Sci 49(4):400–415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weber Y, Schweiger DM (1992) Top management culture conflict in mergers and acquisitions: a lesson from anthropology. Int J Confl Manag 3:1–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zollo M, Singh H (2004) Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in US bank mergers. Strateg Manag J 25:1233–1256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Policy StudiesChuo UniversityHiachiojiJapan
  2. 2.Departments of Bioengineering & Systems Science and Industrial EngineeringBinghamton University, State University of New YorkBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations