Dynamics of knowledge creation in global participatory science communities: open innovation communities from a network perspective



Significant attention has been given to advancing cyber-infrastructures to support virtual engineering and science communities based on the proposition that virtual organizations can more effectively create and leverage knowledge due to diverse information, skills, and resources to enhance capacity to innovate. Yet, relatively little is known about desirable organizing processes in virtual open science communities. To this end, a simulation-based exploratory study is conducted to better understand the conditions that confer increased rates of innovation in such socio-technical systems. Three types of open science communities are identified and simulated using agent simulation as a method of inquiry. Simulation results show that centrality, as a measure of degree of connectedness, correlates with innovation output in exploratory and service communities up to a point. Also, utility-oriented communities have social network structures with low density and high centrality, which suggest high potential for innovation.


Agent simulation Global participatory science Communities of practice Open innovation communities Collective creativity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amabile MT (1996) Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview, Boulder Google Scholar
  2. Bos N, Zimmerman A, Olson J, Yew J, Yerkie J, Dahl E, Olson G (2003) From shared databases to communities. Technical report, Oxford Technical Institute Google Scholar
  3. Brown SJ, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice. Organ Sci 2:40–57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown SJ, Duguid P (2000) The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston Google Scholar
  5. Brown SJ, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social practice perspective. Organ Sci 122:198–213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burt SR (1992) Structural holes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  7. Carley KM, Martin MK, Hirshman BR (2009) The etiology of social change. Top Cogn Sci 1(4):621–650. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01037.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cowan R, Jonard N (2004) Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. J Econ Dyn Diffus Knowl 28:1557–1575 Google Scholar
  9. Crane D (1972) Invisible colleges: diffusion of scientific knowledge in scientific communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
  10. Csikszenthmihalyi M (1999) Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In: Handbook of Creativity, pp 313–338 Google Scholar
  11. David PA, Spence M (2003) Toward institutional infrastructures for e-science: The scope of challenges. Technical report, Oxford Technical Institute Google Scholar
  12. Dhanaraj C, Parkhe A (2006) Orchestrating innovation networks. Acad Manag Rev 31(3):659–669 Google Scholar
  13. Edmonds B (2007) Artificial science—a simulation to study the social processes of science. In: Social simulation: technologies, advances and new discoveries, pp 61–67 Google Scholar
  14. Foster I (2005) Service-oriented science. Science 308:814–817 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilbert N (1997) A simulation of the structure of academic science. Sociological Research Online 2(2), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/3.html
  16. Gordon MD, Lindsay RK (1996) Toward discovery support systems: A replication, re-examination, and extension of swansons work on literature-based discovery of a connection between Raynaud’s and fish oil. Am J Sociol 47(2):116–128 Google Scholar
  17. Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hargadon A, Bechky B (2006) When collections of creatives become crative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ Sci 17:177–192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrison JR, Carroll GR (2006) Culture and demography in organizations. Princeton University Press, Princeton Google Scholar
  20. Holland JH (1995) Hidden order: how adaptation builds complexity. Perseus Books, Culver City Google Scholar
  21. Kilduff M, Corley KG (2000) Organizational culture from a network perspective. In: Handbook of organizational culture & climate, pp 211–221 Google Scholar
  22. Kilduff M, Tsai W (2006) Social networks and organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks Google Scholar
  23. Maanen JV, Barley RS (1984) Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Res Organ Behav 6:287–365 Google Scholar
  24. Mann GS, Mimno D, McCallum A (2006) Bibliometric impact measures leveraging topic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2006 JCDL conference, pp 25–34 Google Scholar
  25. Miller JH, Page SE (2007) Complex adaptive systems: an introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton University Press, Princeton Google Scholar
  26. NanoHUB (2009) Network for computational nanotechnology. http://nanohuborg/
  27. Perry-Smith JR, Shalley CA (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad Manag Rev 28(1):89–106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Powell WW, Snellman K (2004) The knowledge economy. Ann Rev Sociol 30:199–220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York Google Scholar
  30. Simard C, West J (2006) Knowledge networks and the geographic locus of innovation. In: Open innovation: researching a new paradigm, pp 220–240 Google Scholar
  31. Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W, Ceusters W, Goldberg LJ, Eilbeck K, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, Consortium TO, Leontis N, Rocca-Serra P, Ruttenberg A, Sansone SA, Scheuermann RH, Shah N, Whetzel PL, Lewis S (2007) The OBO foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 25(11):1251–1255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stankiewicz R (1992) Technology as an autonomous socio-cognitive system. In: Dynamics of science-based innovation. Springer, New York Google Scholar
  33. Tenenbaum M, Willbanks J (2008) Therapy development in a networked world: Introduction and overview. Science commons technical report Google Scholar
  34. Ward TB, Smith SM, Vaid J (1997) Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. In: Creative thought: an investigation of conceptual structures and processes, pp 1–30 Google Scholar
  35. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, identity, Cambridge. Press, New York Google Scholar
  36. Ye Y, Nakakoji K, Yamamoto Y, Kishida K (2005) The co-evolution of systems and communities in free and open source software development. In: Free/open source software development, pp 59–82 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.M&SNet: Auburn Modeling and Simulation Lab, Computer Science and Software EngineeringAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations