Computational and mathematical approaches to societal transitions

  • Jos Timmermans
  • Hans de Haan
  • Flaminio Squazzoni
Open Access
Article

Abstract

After an introduction of the theoretical framework and concepts of transition studies, this article gives an overview of how structural change in social systems has been studied from various disciplinary perspectives. This overview first leads to the conclusion that computational and mathematical approaches and their practical form, modeling, up till now, have been almost absent in the research and theorizing of structural change or transitions in social systems. Second, this review of the social science literature suggests numerous theoretical constructs relevant for transition modeling. Relevant concepts include the conceptualization of the micro-to-macro link, the importance of explaining both stability and change, quantitative and qualitative definitions of structural change, the use of dichotomies, synchronic and diachronic reasoning in explaining structural change, definitions of basic patterns of social change, the conceptualization of resistance to change and intentional and normative aspects of social change. This article employs these theoretical concepts to describe and discuss the models presented in this special issue in order to develop an understanding of what exactly entails a computational or mathematical approach to societal transitions.

Keywords

Societal transitions Micro-macro link Agent-based models Complexity 

References

  1. Aassve A, Billari FC, Spéder Z (2006) Societal transition, policy. Changes and family formation: evidence from Hungary. Eur J Popul 22(2):127–152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323–351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur WB (1994) Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor Google Scholar
  4. Baumgartner FR, Jones BD (1993) Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
  5. Berkhout F, Smith A, Stirling A (2004) Socio-technical regimes and transition contexts. In: Elzen B, Geels FW, Green K (eds) System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Google Scholar
  6. Black CE (1966) The dynamics of modernization. Harper, New York Google Scholar
  7. Braudel F (1979) Civilization and capitalism, 15th–18th century, III volumes. University of California Press, Berkeley, Reprint edition 1992 Google Scholar
  8. Byrne D (1998) Complexity theory and the social sciences. Routledge, London Google Scholar
  9. Byrne DS (2001) Understanding the urban. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, p 240 Google Scholar
  10. Castells M (1996) The information age: economy, society and culture, volume I of the rise of the network society. Blackwell, Oxford Google Scholar
  11. Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, London Google Scholar
  12. Cox OC (1974) The problem of societal transition. Am J Sociol 79(5):1120–1133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis K (1945) The world demographic transition. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 235:1–11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutsch K (1961) Social mobilization and political development. Am Polit Sci Rev 79(5):493–514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Driel HV, Schot J (2005) Radical innovation as a multilevel process: introducing floating grain elevators in the port of Rotterdam. Technol Cult 46(1):51–76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenstadt SN (1973) Tradition, change and modernity. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs Google Scholar
  17. Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibrium: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf, Freeman TJF (eds) Models in paleobiology. Cooper & Co, San Francisco, pp 82–115 Google Scholar
  18. Elias N (1969) The court society. Pantheon, New York Google Scholar
  19. Fiol CM, Harris D, House R (1999) Charismatic leadership: strategies for effecting social change. Leadersh Q 10(3):449–482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geels F (2005) Technological transitions and system innovations: a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p 279 Google Scholar
  21. Geels F (2006) The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930), the dynamics of regime transformation. Res Policy 35(7):1069–1082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36(3):399–417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  24. Gilbert N (2008) Agent-based models. Sage, London Google Scholar
  25. Gould SJ (1980) The Panda’s Thumb: more reflections on natural history. W.W. Norton, New York Google Scholar
  26. Gould SJ, Eldredge N (1977) Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3:115–151 Google Scholar
  27. Gunderson L, Holing CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London, p 507 Google Scholar
  28. Hernes G (1976) Structural change in social processes. Am J Soc 82(3):513–547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones BD, Baumgartner FR (2005) A model of choice for public policy. J Public Adm Res Theory 15(3):325–351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technol Anal Strat Manag 10:175–196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kingdon JW (1984) Agendas, alternatives and public policy. Longman, imprint of Addison Wesley Longman, New York Google Scholar
  32. Lewin K (1951) Field theory in social science. Harper and Row, New York Google Scholar
  33. Linz JJ, Stepan A (1996) Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Google Scholar
  34. Loorbach D (2007) Transition management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books, Utrecht Google Scholar
  35. Medearis J (2001) Ideology, democracy and the limits of equilibrium: a Schumpeterian critique. Br J Polit Sci 31:355–388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller D, Friesen P (1984) A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Manag Sci 30(10):1161–1183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nicolis G, Prigogine I (1989) Exploring complexity. W.H. Freeman, New York, p 313 Google Scholar
  38. North DC (2005) Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, Princeton Google Scholar
  39. Parsons T (1966) Societies: evolutionary and comparative perspectives. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Google Scholar
  40. Parsons T (1971) The system of modern societies. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Google Scholar
  41. Polanyi K (1944) The great transformation: the political and economic origin of our time. Beacon Press, Boston Google Scholar
  42. Potts J (2000) The new evolutionary microeconomics: complexity, competence and adaptive behaviour. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Google Scholar
  43. Rammel C, van den Bergh JCJM (2003) Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: adaptive flexibility and risk minimising. J Evol Econ 47(3):121–133 Google Scholar
  44. Rip A, Kemp R (1998) Technological change. In: Rayner S, Malone EL (eds) Human choice and climate change, vol 2. Battelle Press, Columbus, pp 327–399 Google Scholar
  45. Rostow WW (1960) The stages of economic growth: a non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  46. Rotmans J (1998) Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead. Environ Model Assess 3(3):155–179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rotmans J (2005) Societal innovation: between dream and reality lies complexity. ERIM, Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Rotterdam, p 76 Google Scholar
  48. Rotmans J, Kemp R, van Asselt M, Geels F, Verbong G, Molendijk K (2000) Transitions and transition management, the case of an emission-free energy supply. ICIS/MERIT, Maastricht Google Scholar
  49. Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC (1993) Policy change and learning—an advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press, Boulder Google Scholar
  50. Schot J, Hoogma R, Elzen B (1994) Strategies for shifting technological systems. The case of the automobile system. Futures 24(10):1060–1066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schumpeter JA (1912) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, interest, and the business cycle. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick and London Google Scholar
  52. Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New York Google Scholar
  53. Simmel G (1904) The philosophy of money. Routledge, London Google Scholar
  54. Squazzoni F (2008) A (computational) social science perspective on societal transitions. Comput Math Organ Theory (this issue) Google Scholar
  55. van den Bergh JCJM, Gowdy JM (2003) The microfoundations of macroeconomics: an evolutionary perspective. Cambridge J Econ 27:65–84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van den Bergh JCJM, Kemp R (2006) Economics and transitions: lessons from economic sub-disciplines. UNU-MERIT working paper series 2006-038. http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2006/wp2006-038.pdf
  57. van den Bergh JCJM, Stagl S (2006) Co-evolution of economic behaviour and institutions: towards a theory of institutional change. J Evol Econ 13(3) Google Scholar
  58. van der Brugge R, Rotmans J (2006) Towards transition management of European water resources. Water Res Manag 21(1):249–267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verbong G, Geels F (2006) The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy 35(2):1025–1037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wallerstein I (1974) The modern world-system I. Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. Academic Press, New York Google Scholar
  61. Weber M (1904/1905) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Routledge, London Google Scholar
  62. Weber M (1925) Economy and society. University of California Press, Berkeley Google Scholar
  63. Wilson CA (2000) Policy regimes and policy change. J Public Policy 20(3):247–274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Witt U (2003) The evolving economy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Google Scholar
  65. Wolfram S (2002) A new kind of science. Wolfram Media, Champaign, p 1197 Google Scholar
  66. Worren NAM, Ruddle K, Moorem K (1999) From organizational development to change management: the emergence of a new profession. J Appl Behav Sci 35(3):273–286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jos Timmermans
    • 1
  • Hans de Haan
    • 1
  • Flaminio Squazzoni
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Social Sciences, Dutch Research Institute for TransitionsErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations