Advertisement

Studying transition dynamics via focusing on underlying feedback interactions

Modelling the Dutch waste management transition
  • Gönenç Yücel
  • Catherine Miluska Chiong Meza
Open Access
Article

Abstract

The emerging need for societal transitions raises the need for a better understanding of the dynamic nature of large scale societal systems, and therefore the development of an analytical approach for drawing dynamic conclusions based on system’s dynamic mechanisms, feedback relationships and interacting components.

The objective of this study is to explore the degree to which System Dynamics as an approach enhances the process of understanding transition dynamics in socio-technical systems. In other words, it is aimed to reveal the type of insights that can be developed about such systems and their dynamic behaviour using the approach, as well as the shortcomings of the approach in this challenging task. In order to do so, a modeling study aiming to understand the underlying mechanisms of the waste management transition in the Netherlands is conducted.

The quantitative model developed is based on the historical case of the waste management transition of the Netherlands, and it portrays issues as the dynamics of actors’ preferences, development of infrastructure and environmental consequences of dominant mode of functioning and provides an instance for demonstrating and evaluating the feedback-focused perspective discussed in this paper.

Finally, the paper discusses a set of points regarding the utilized approach, System Dynamics, observed during this study both in general and in the specific context of transitions. In short, System Dynamics stands as a promising approach mainly due to its strength in explaining the source of complex dynamics based on interacting feedback loops, but it also has certain drawbacks in the context of transitions.

Keywords

Transitions System dynamics Simulation model Waste management 

References

  1. Barlas Y (1996) Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 12(3):183–210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlas Y, Kanar K (1999) A dynamic pattern-oriented test for model validation. In: Proceedings of 4th systems science European congress, Valencia, 1999. http://www.ie.boun.edu.tr/~ybarlas/BarlasKorhan99.pdf
  3. Berkhout F, Smith A, Stirling A (2004) Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts, chap 3. System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Glos Google Scholar
  4. Coleman J (1990) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  5. Coyle G (2000) Qualitative and quantitative modelling in system dynamics: some research questions. Syst Dyn Rev 16(3):225–244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fiddaman T (1997) Feedback complexity in integrated climate-economy models. PhD thesis, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Google Scholar
  7. Forrester J (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  8. Forrester J (1969) Urban dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  9. Forrester J, Senge P (1980) Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. System dynamics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 209–228 Google Scholar
  10. Geels F (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study. Res Policy 31:1257–1274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geels F (2005a) Co-evolution of technology and society: the transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930)—a case study in multi-level perspective. Technol Soc 27:363–397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geels F (2005b) The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: a multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 17(4):445–476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geels F, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36:399–417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guneralp B (2006) Towards coherent loop dominance analysis: progress in eigenvalue elasticity analysis. Syst Dyn Rev 22(3):263–289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Homer J (1987) A diffusion model with application to evolving medical technologies. Technol Forecast Soc Change 31(3):197–218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kampmann C, Oliva R (2006) Loop eigenvalue elasticity analysis: three case studies. Syst Dyn Rev 22(2):141–162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keeney R, Gregory R (2005) Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Oper Res 53(1):1–11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keeney R, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  19. Loorbach D (2007) Transition management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. PhD thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam Google Scholar
  20. Mahajan V, Peterson R (1985) Models for innovation diffusion. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks Google Scholar
  21. Mahajan V, Muller E, Wind Y (eds) (2000) New-product diffusion models. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht Google Scholar
  22. Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers J, Behrens W (1972) The limits to growth. Potomac Associates, New York Google Scholar
  23. Oliva R (2004) Model structure analysis through graph theory: partition heuristics and feedback structure decomposition. Syst Dyn Rev 20(4):313–336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Randers J (1980) Guidelines for model conceptualization. In: Randers J (ed) Elements of the system dynamics method. Productivity Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  25. Richardson G, Pugh A (1961) Introduction to system dynamics modelling with DYNAMO. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  26. Richardson GP (1991) Feedback thought in social science and systems theory. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia Google Scholar
  27. Rogers E (1983) Diffusion of innovations, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  28. Rotmans J (2005) Societal innovation: between dream and reality lies complexity. Erasmus University, Rotterdam Google Scholar
  29. Rotmans J, Kemp R, Asselt M (2001) More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1):15–31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schade B, Schade W (2005) Assessment of environmentally sustainable transport scenarios by a backcasting approach with escot. In: Proceedings of the 23th International conference of the system dynamics society, Boston, 2005 Google Scholar
  31. Sterman J (1981) The energy transition and the economy: a system dynamics approach. PhD thesis, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Google Scholar
  32. Sterman J (1994) Learning in and about complex systems. Syst Dyn Rev 10(1):291–330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sterman J (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston Google Scholar
  34. Struben J, Sterman J (2008) Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environment and planning B: planning and design advance online publication Google Scholar
  35. Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28:817–830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Unruh GC (2002) Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 30:317–325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van der Brugge R, Rotmans J, Loorbach D (2005) The transition in Dutch water management. Reg Environ Change 5:164–176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yücel G, Barlas Y (2007) Pattern-based system design/optimization. In: Sterman J, Oliva R (eds) Proceedings of the 25th international conference of the system dynamics society, Boston, 2007. http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2007/proceed/index.htm
  39. Yücel G, Chiong Meza CM (2007) Benefiting from the other: proposals on incorporating agent based and system dynamics approaches. In: Amblard F (ed) Proceedings of the 4th conference of the European social simulation association, Toulouse, 2007. http://essa2007.free.fr/ESSA2007Proceedings.pdf

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gönenç Yücel
    • 1
  • Catherine Miluska Chiong Meza
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations