Advertisement

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 241–281 | Cite as

A quantum metric of organizational performance: Terrorism and counterterrorism

  • W. F. LawlessEmail author
  • Margo Bergman
  • J. Louçã
  • Nicole N. Kriegel
  • Nick Feltovich
Article

Abstract

Political terrorism and insurgency have become the primary means of global war among states. Lacking comparable military and political means to compete directly with Western civilization, many failed states and tribes have honed the art of asymmetric warfare. But traditional models of organizations do not work under normal or these extreme circumstances, precluding realistic models of terrorism and a fruitful search among alternatives for potential solutions. In contrast to traditional models, we have made substantial progress with a quantum model of organizations, which we further develop in this study with the introduction of a case study of a normal organization in the process of being restructured. We apply preliminary results from our model to terrorist organizations and counter terrorism.

Keywords

Quantum models Organization theory Terrorism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aburish SK (1998) A brutal friendship: the West and Arab elite. St. Martins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Aharonov Y, Bohm D (1961) Phys Rev 122:1649–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Air Transport Association (ATA) (2002) Cost of air travel. www.airlines.org/public/home/default1.asp
  4. Allport FH (1962) A structuronomic conception of behavior. J Abnormal Soc Psychol 64:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambrose SH (2001) Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Sci 291:1748–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrade G, Stafford E (1999) Investigating the economic role of mergers (Working Paper 00–006). Cambridge, Harvard MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrade G, Mitchell M, Stafford E (2001) New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Retrieved on July 15, 2005 from ssrn.com/abstract = 269313Google Scholar
  8. AHDR (2002) Arab Human Development Report. UN (www.undp.org/rbas/aher/)
  9. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. BasicGoogle Scholar
  10. Axsom D, Lawless WF (1992) J Exp Soc Psychol 28:387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Axtell R (2002) Personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  12. Ball SB, Eckel CC (1998) The Economic Value of Status. J Socio-Econ 27(4):495–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Banerjee A (1992) A Simple Model of Herd Behavior. Q J Econ 58(3):797–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bankes SC (2002) Perspective. Agent-based modeling. In: Proceedings national academy of sciences vol. 99, no.(3), pp 7199–7200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baumeister RF (2002) Ego depletion and self-control failure: an energy model of the self's executive function. Self and Identity 1:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Baumeister RF (2005) Keynote: self-control, decision making and ego depletion. In: society of southeastern social psychologists (SSSP). St. Augustine, FLGoogle Scholar
  17. Baumeister RF, Campbell JD, Krueger JI, Vohs KD (2005) Exploding the self-esteem myth. Sci AmeGoogle Scholar
  18. Becker G S (1974) A Theory of Social Interaction. J Political Econ 82(6):1063–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Benardete S (2002) The argument of the action: essays on Greek poetry and philosophy. Chicago U. Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  20. Benz W (2006) A concise history of the thrd Reich. In: Dunlap, T. (Tr.) (ed) Berkeley, UCLA PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Bergman M When a fad ends: a heterogeneous model of imitative behavior. unpublishedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A Theory of Fads, Fashion, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades. J Political Econ 100(5):992–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bohr N (1955) Science and the unity of knowledge. In: Leary L (ed) The unity of knowledg Doubleday, New York pp 44–62Google Scholar
  24. Brehm JW (1966) A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Brewer MB (2004) Taking the social origins of human nature seriously: toward a more imperialistic social psychology. Personality Soc Psychol Rev 8(2):107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Campbell DT (1996) Can we overcome worldview incommensurability/relativity in trying to understand the other? In: Jessor R, Shweder RA (eds) Ethnography and human development. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Carley KM (2002) Simulating society: the tension between transparency and veridicality. In: Social Agents: ecology, exchange, and evolution. University of Chicago, Argonne National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  28. Carley KM (2003a) Dynamic network analysis. Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis.Workshop Summary and Papers. R. Breiger, Carley, K., and Pattison, P., National Research Council of the National Academies, The National Academies Press, pp. 133–145Google Scholar
  29. Carley K (2003b) Destabilizing networks. Presentation at NAACSOS, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  30. Chang GC (2001) The coming collapse of China. RandomGoogle Scholar
  31. Chubin S, Green JD (2002) Terrorism and asymmetric conflict in Southwest Asia, Rand (www.rand.org)
  32. Coase R (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4:386Google Scholar
  33. Conzelmann G, Boyd R, Cirillo V, Koritarov CM, Macal MJ, North PR Thimmapuram, Veselka T (2004) Analyzing the Potential for Market Power Using an Agent-Based Modeling Approach: results of a detailed U.S. Power Market Simulation. International Conference on Computing. Communication and Control Technologies, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  34. Crick F, Koch C (1998) Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex 8:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, HarcourtGoogle Scholar
  36. Eisert J, Wilkens M, Lewenstein M (1999) Quantum games and quantum strategies. Phys Rev Lett 83(15):3077–3080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ehrlich P (2001) Human natures. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Ehrlich P, Kennedy D (2005) Millennium assessment of human behavior. Sci 309:562–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Esposito JL (1999) The Islamic Threat: myth or reality. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Fama EF (1965) Random walks in stock market prices. Paper No. 16 in a series The Selected Papers of the Graduate School of Business, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  41. Feldstein M (2006) op-ed. The Wall Street Journal, A16Google Scholar
  42. Feltovich N (2006) Personal communication, emailGoogle Scholar
  43. Festinger L, Riecken HW, Schachter S (1956) When prophecy fails. Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
  44. Foley C (1893) Fashion. Econ J 3(11):28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. French AP, Taylor EF (1978) An introduction to quantum physics. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Glaeser EL (1996) Why economists still like cities. City J 6(2) (Retrieved from www.city-journal.org/html/6_2_why_economists.html)
  47. Gmytrasiewicz PJ (2002) On decision-theoretic approach to game theory, SS-02-02, AAAI Menlo Park, CA pp 1–8Google Scholar
  48. Gershenfeld N (2000) The physcs of information. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Gürek Ö, Irlenbusch B, Rockenbach B (2006) The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Sci 312:108–111 (see accompanying Perspective: Henrich J, 60–61)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hagan S, Hameroff SR, Tuszynski JA (2002) Quantum computation in brain microtubles. Phys Rev E 65:061901–1,11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hall BJ, Knox T (2002) Managing option fragility. Harvard National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper 02–19Google Scholar
  52. Hannebauer M (2000) Their problems are my problems. In: Tessier C, Muller L, Boston HJ (eds) Conflicting agents: conflict management in multi-agent systems. Kluwer. vol. 1 pp 63–109Google Scholar
  53. Harte J (2002) Toward a synthesis of the Newtonian and Darwinian worldviews. Phys Today 29–34Google Scholar
  54. Hayek F (1944) The road to serfdom. U. of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  55. Heisenberg W (1958/1999) Language and reality in modern physics. In: Physics and philosophy. The revolution in modern science. Chapter 10, Prometheus Books, New York, pp 167–186Google Scholar
  56. Hertz J, Krogh A, Palmer RG (1991) Introduction to neural computation. Add.-Wesley, Redwood City, CAGoogle Scholar
  57. House JS, Landis, Umberson (1988) Social relationships and health. Sci 241:540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hoffman B (2002) Testimony: Lessons of 9/11. Committee Record U.S. Joint September 11, 2002 Inquiry Staff House and Senate Select Committees on Intelligence, October 8, 2002 (www.rand.org)
  59. Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D (2005) Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annu Rev Psychol 56:517–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. IRF (2002) The 2002 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom, U.S. Department of State (www.state.gov/g/drl/irf/)
  61. Johnson C (2001) Blowback: the costs and consequences of American empire. Owl BooksGoogle Scholar
  62. Jones EE (1990) Interpersonal perception. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Jones EE (1998) Major developments in soc psych. In: Gilbert et al (eds) Handbook of social psychology vol I, McGraw, pp 3–57Google Scholar
  64. Kaldor M (2000) Cosmopolitanism and Organised Violence, Conference on Conceiving Cosmopolitanism. Warwick, 27–29 April 2000Google Scholar
  65. Katz M, Shapiro C (1985) Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility. Ame Econ Rev 75(3):424–440Google Scholar
  66. Kelley HH (1992) Lewin, situations, and interdependence. J Soc Issues 47:211–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kirk R (2003) More terrible than death. Massacres, drugs, and America's war in Columbia. Public AffairsGoogle Scholar
  68. Klein, G. (1997). Overview. In: Zsambok and Klein (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Erlbaum, pp 49–59Google Scholar
  69. Kruglanski AW, Pierro A, Mannetti L, De Grada E (2006) Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychol Rev 113:84–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Krushchev NS (1990) Krushchev remembers: the Glasnost tapes. In: Schecter JL (Tr) (ed) Little Brown, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Kuhn T (1977) The essential tension. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  72. Latane B (1981) The psychology of social impact. Ame Psychol 36:343–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lawless WF (2001) The quantum of social action and the function of emotion. In: Proceedings. AAAI Fall, pp 73–78Google Scholar
  74. Lawless WF, Chandrasekara R (2002) Information density functional theory: a quantum approach to intent. In: Proceedings AAAI fall symposium on intent inferencing. AAAI Press, Cape Cod, MA, pp 26–31Google Scholar
  75. Lawless WF, Grayson JM (2004) A quantum perturbation model (QPM) of knowledge and organizational mergers. In: van Elst L, Dignum V (eds) Agent mediated knowledge management. Berlin, Springer pp 143–161Google Scholar
  76. Lawless WF, Schwartz M (2002) The social quantum model of dissonance. From social organization to cultural evolution. Soc Sci Compu Rev (Sage) 20(4):441–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lawless WF, Whitton J (2006) The Reduction of Risk Perception: consensus-Making versus Truth-Seeking. In: Proceedings Waste Management′06, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  78. Lawless WF, Bergman M, Feltovich N (2005) Consensus-seeking versus truth-seeking. ASCE Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 9(1):59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lawless WF, Bergman M, Feltovich N (2006) A physics of organizational uncertainty. Perturbations, measurement and computational agents. In: Chen S-H, Jain L, Tai C-C (eds) Computational economics: a perspective from computational intelligence. Hershey, PA, Idea Books, pp 268–289Google Scholar
  80. Lawless WF, Castelao, Abubucker (2000) Conflict as a heurestic in the development of an interaction mechanics. In: Tessier CL, Muller HJ (eds), Conflicting agents: conflict management in multi-agent systems, Kluwer, Boston, vol 1, pp 279–302Google Scholar
  81. Leibenstein H (1950) Bandwagon, Snob and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand. Q J Econ 64(2):183–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Levine JM, Moreland RL (1998) Small groups. In: Gilbert et al (eds) Handbook of social psychology. McGraw, pp 415–469Google Scholar
  83. Levine JM, Moreland RL (2004) Collaboration: the social context of theory development. Personality Soc Psychol Rev 8(2):164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lewin K (1951) Field theory in social science. HarperGoogle Scholar
  85. Logan G (2004) Cumulative progress in formal theories of attention. A Rev Psychol 55:207–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Luce RD (1963) Decision and recognition. In: Luce RD et al (eds) Handbook of mathematical psychology, Wiley, New York, pp 103–189Google Scholar
  87. Luce RD (1997) Several unresolved conceptual problems of mathematical psychology. J Math Psychol 41:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Luce RD, Raiffa H (1967) Games and decision. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. MacKerrow E, Reardon B (2003b) Agent based simulation of socio-economic and cultural factors which motivate social instability and terrorism, Presentation at NAACSOS, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  90. Malkiel BG (2000) A random walk down wall street (7th edn). Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  91. May RM (1973/2001) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  92. Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  93. Naji AB (2006) The management of savagery: The most critical stage through which the Umma will pass. McCants, W. (Tr.). Cambridge, John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies at Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  94. Nash JF, Jr (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Pfeffer J, Fong CT (2005) Building organization theory from first principles: the self-enhancement motive and understanding power and influence. Organ Sci 16:372–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Pigou AC (1913) The Interdependence of Different Sources of Demand and Supply in a Market. Econo J 23(89):19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Rae J (1834) Statement of Some New Principles on the Subject of Political Economy, Exposing the Fallacies of the System of Free Trade, And of some other Doctrines maintained in the ‘Wealth of Nations’. Hilliard, GrayGoogle Scholar
  98. Rapoport A, Budescu DV (1992) Generation of random binary series in strictly competitive games. J Exp Psychol: Gen 121:352–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rosenblatt A, Greenberg J, Solomon S, Pyszczynski T, Lyon D (1990) Evidence for terror management theroy. J Personality Soc Psychol 57:681–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sallach D (2002) Mod Modeling emotional dynamics: currency versus fields. (unpublished), U. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  101. Schumpeter JA (1989) A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. Porcupine PressGoogle Scholar
  102. Sen A (2000) Development as freedom. KnopfGoogle Scholar
  103. Shafir E, LeBoeuf RA (2002) Rationality. Annu Rev Psychol 53:491–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Shearer RR, Gould SJ (1999) Essay on science and society. Sci 286:109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Skinner BF (1978) Reflections on behaviorism and society. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  106. Slovic P, Layman M, Kraus N, Flynn J, Chalmers J, Gesell G (2001) Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. In: Flynn J, Slovic P, Kunreuther H (eds) Risk, Media and Stigma. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  107. Stiglitz JE (2002, forthcoming) Globalization and its discontents. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  108. Taylor SE, Brown JD (1988) Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol Bull 103:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Tsvetovat M, Carley K (2003) Bouncing back: recovery mechanisms of covert networks. In: Presentation at NAACSOS. Pittsburgh, PA, Carnegie-Mellon UniversityGoogle Scholar
  110. Veblen T (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class. Retrieved from xroads.virginia.edu~hyper/VEBLEN/veblenhp.html, 6/4/06
  111. Von Neumann J (1961) The mathematician. Collected works, PergamonGoogle Scholar
  112. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton U. PressGoogle Scholar
  113. Weick KE, Quinn RE (1999) Organizational change and development. Annu Rev Psychol 50:361–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Welch I (1992) Sequential Sales, Learning, and Cascades. J Finance 47(2):695732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wendt A (1999) Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  116. Wendt A (2005, forthcoming) Social theory as cartesian science: An auto-critique from a quantum perspective. In: Guzzini S, Leander A (eds) Constructivism and international relations. Routledge, New York. pp 181–219 (excluding references)Google Scholar
  117. Woo G (2002) Quantifying insurance terrorism risk. National Bureau Research Meeting, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  118. Worchel S (1999) Written in blood. WorthGoogle Scholar
  119. WP (2001) White Paper. European governance (COM (2001) 428 final; Brussels, 25.7.2001). BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  120. Zajonc RB (1998) Emotion. In: Gilbert et al (eds) Handbook social psychology. McGrawGoogle Scholar
  121. Zeilinger A (1999) Experiment and foundations of quantum physics. Revi Modern Phys 71:S288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zinoviev A (1976) Yawning heights (a philosophical satire against the Soviet States at the height of its power)Google Scholar
  123. Zlot R, Stentz A, Dias MB, Thayer S (2002) Market-driven multi-robot exploration (CMU-RI-TR-02-02). Carengie Mellon UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. F. Lawless
    • 1
    Email author
  • Margo Bergman
    • 2
  • J. Louçã
    • 3
  • Nicole N. Kriegel
    • 4
  • Nick Feltovich
    • 5
  1. 1.Paine CollegeAugustaUSA
  2. 2.HoustonUSA
  3. 3.ISCTE cacifo 296LisboaPortugal
  4. 4.Augusta State UniversityAugustaUSA
  5. 5.Department of EconomicsUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations