Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 6, pp 15273–15283 | Cite as

Zone-based dual sub sink for network lifetime maximization in wireless sensor network

  • K. ArthiEmail author
  • A. Singara Rajiva Lochana
Article

Abstract

Wireless sensor network (WSN) consists of large number of tiny sensor nodes connected through wireless network. The major challenge of WSN is to ensure lifetime extension of sensor nodes, as they are battery powered. Static or mobile sinks are deployed for data acquisition from these sensor nodes. Nodes near the sink are responsible to relay data from other nodes, raising the possibility of energy wear out of these nodes. This paper discusses on the extension of lifetime of sensor nodes that are near the trajectory of the mobile sink, in particular considering navigation in fixed trajectory. Energy efficient zone-based dual sub sink protocol with dual cluster head is developed to schedule the data transmission of these relay nodes with mobile sink. The hybrid adaptive time synchronization method minimizes collision during data transfer between clusters and helps to improve the throughput of the network. It is proved from simulation and real time experiments that the proposed protocol outperforms the existing techniques in terms of energy utilization and throughput.

Keywords

Dual cluster head Mobile sink Fixed trajectory Wireless sensor network 

References

  1. 1.
    Ekici, E., Yaoyao, G., Bozdag, D.: Mobility-based communication in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 44(7), 56–62 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Somasundara, A., Ramamoorthy, A., Srivastava, M.: Mobile element scheduling for efficient data collection in wireless sensor networks with dynamic deadlines. In: Proceeding 25th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS), pp. 296–305 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pham, H., Jha, S.: An adaptive mobility-aware MAC protocol for sensor networks (MS-MAC). In: Mobile Ad hoc and Sensor Systems, 2004 IEEE International Conference on October, IEEE, pp. 558–560 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reddy, S., Samanta, V., Burke, J., et al.: MobiSense—mobile network services for coordinated participatory sensing. In: Autonomous Decentralized Systems (ISADS’09), IEEE International Symposium, pp. 1–6 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacquet, P., Muhlethaler, P., Clausen, T., Laouiti, A., Qayyum, A., Viennot, L.: Optimized link state routing protocol for ad hoc networks. In: Proceeding IEEE International Multi Topic Conference, Technology for the Twenty First Century, pp. 62–68 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dantu, K., Sukhatme, G.: Connectivity vs. control: using directional and positional cues to stabilize routing in robot networks. In: IEEE Second International Conference on Robot Communication and Coordination (ROBOCOMM’09), pp. 1–6 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ye, F., Luo, H., Cheng, J., Lu, S., Zhang, L.: A two-tier data dissemination model for large-scale wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual International Conference on Mobile computing and networking, ACM, pp. 148–159 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akkaya, K., Younis, M.; Energy-aware routing to a mobile gateway in wireless sensor networks. In: Global Telecommunications Conference Workshops, GlobeCom Workshops 2004, IEEE, pp. 16–21 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ammari, H., Das, S.K: Data dissemination to mobile sinks in wireless sensor networks: an information theoretic approach. In: Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), pp. 8–314 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, H.S., Abdelzaher, T.F., Kwon, W.H.: Minimum-energy asynchronous dissemination to mobile sinks in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2003), pp. 193–204 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, H.S., Abdelzaher, T.F., Kwon, W.H.: Dynamic delay-constrained minimum-energy dissemination in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. (TECS) 4(3), 679–706 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Woo, A., Tong, T., Culler, D.: Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, ACM, pp. 14–27 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luo, J., Panchard, J., Piórkowski, M., Grossglauser, M., Hubaux, J.P.: Mobiroute: routing towards a mobile sink for improving lifetime in sensor networks. In: Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, pp. 480–497 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gao, S., Zhang, H., Das, S.K.: Efficient data collection in wireless sensor networks with path-constrained mobile sinks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 10(4), 592–608 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chatzigiannakis, I., Kinalis, A., Nikoletseas, S.: Sink mobility protocols for data collection in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM international workshop on Mobility Management and Wireless Access, pp. 52–59 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Somasundara, A.A., Kansal, A., Jea, D.D., Estrin, D., Srivastava, M.B.: Controllably mobile infrastructure for low energy embedded networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 5(8), 958–973 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mamalis, B., Gavalas, D., Konstantopoulos, C., Pantziou, G.: Clustering in wireless sensor networks. In: Zhang, Y., Yang, L.T., Chen, J. (eds.) RFID and sensor networks: architectures, protocols, security and integrations, pp. 324–353 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elson, J., Girod, L., Estrin, D.: Fine-grained network time synchronization using reference broadcasts. ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 36(1), 147–163 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reina, D.G., Toral, S.L., Johnson, P., Barrero, F.J.: Route duration improvement in wireless sensor and actuator networks based on mobility parameters and flooding control. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 147(1), 1–25 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chhieng, V.M., Wong, R.K., Fong, S., et al.: Autonomous path based data acquisition in sensor networks. J. Supercomput. 72, 4021 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yim, Yongbin, Kim, Kyong Hoon, Aldwairi, Monther, Kim, Ki-Il: Energy-efficient region shift scheme to support mobile sink group in wireless sensor networks. Sensors 18(1), 679–706 (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Safia, A.A., Aghbari, Z.A., Kamel, I.: Efficient data collection by mobile sink to detect phenomena in internet of things. Information 8(4), 123 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringVel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and TechnologyChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations