Knowledge diffusion simulation of knowledge networks: based on complex network evolutionary algorithms

Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Based on the evolutionary algorithms of the four complex networks, the evolution of knowledge network is regarded as that of complex networks. With the heterogeneity of knowledge level, knowledge absorptive and innovative capacity and agents’ knowledge types considered, theoretical models of knowledge network evolution are constructed. Through numerical simulation, different network structures are analyzed in terms of their effects on the diffusion efficiency of the overall knowledge as well as of various types of knowledge. The simulation results show that: with the diffusion of the overall knowledge considered, although the overall knowledge level in a small-world structure is lower than the random network in the early and middle stage, it is close to the highest one later on; moreover, its growth rate is relatively higher among all four networks and its knowledge levels are distributed most uniformly. With regard to the diffusion of different types of knowledge, the small-world network is proved to produce the most uniform gap between knowledge types and help those dominant industries in the early stage remain advanced during the evolutionary process.

Keywords

Knowledge network Knowledge diffusion Complex network Heterogeneity Knowledge absorptive capacity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71602012), Chengdu Soft Science Project (No. 2016-RK00-00247-ZF) and Philosophy and Social Science Research Fund Project of Chengdu University of Technology (No. YJ2017-JX003).

References

  1. 1.
    Wei, Q., Gu, X.: Knowledge networks formation and interchain coupling of knowledge chains. J. Appl. Sci. 13(20), 4181–4187 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A.X., Fienberg, S.E., Airoldi, E.M.: A survey of statistical network models. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2(2), 129–233 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raducha, T., Gubiec, T.: Coevolving complex networks in the model of social interactions. Phys. A 471, 427–435 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luo, S., Du, Y., Liu, P., Xuan, Z., Wang, Y.: A study on coevolutionary dynamics of knowledge diffusion and social network structure. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(7), 3619–3633 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luo, S., Du, Y., Liu, P., Xuan, Z., Wang, Y.: A study on coevolutionary dynamics of knowledge diffusion and social network structure. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(7), 3619–3633 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Long, W., Guan, L., Shen, J., Song, L., Cui, L.: A complex network for studying the transmission mechanisms in stock market. Phys. A 484, 345–357 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, H., An, H., Fang, W., Wang, Y., Zhong, W., Yan, L.: Global energy investment structure from the energy stock market perspective based on a heterogeneous complex network model. Appl. Energy 194, 648–657 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, T., Ma, J.: The complex dynamics of R&D competition models of three oligarchs with heterogeneous players. Nonlinear Dyn. 74(1–2), 45–54 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bogliacino, F., Pianta, M.: Profits, R&D, and innovation—a model and a test. Ind. Corp. Chang 22(3), 649–678 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, J., Ban, Y.: The evolving network structure of US airline system during 1990–2010. Phys. A 410, 302–312 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jia, T., Jiang, B.: Building and analyzing the US airport network based on en-route location information. Phys. A 391(15), 4031–4042 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: Epidemic dynamics and endemic states in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 63(6), 066117 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barthélemy, M., Barrat, A., Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: Dynamical patterns of epidemic outbreaks in complex heterogeneous networks. J. Theor. Biol. 235(2), 275–288 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beckmann, M.J.: Economic models of knowledge networks. In: Networks in Action, pp. 159–174. Springer, Berlin (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kobayashi, K. Knowledge Network and Market Structure: An Analytical Perspective. In: Networks in Action, pp. 127–158. Springer, Berlin (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen, C., Hicks, D.: Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics 59(2), 199–211 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luo, S., Du, Y., Liu, P., Xuan, Z., Wang, Y.: A study on coevolutionary dynamics of knowledge diffusion and social network structure. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(7), 3619–3633 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lööf, H., Broström, A.: Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? J. Technol. Transf. 33(1), 73–90 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cowan, R., Jonard, N.: Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. J. Econom. Dyn. Control 28(8), 1557–1575 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin, M., Li, N.: Scale-free network provides an optimal pattern for knowledge transfer. Phys. A 389(3), 473–480 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou, W., Jia, Y.: Predicting links based on knowledge dissemination in complex network. Phys. A 471, 561–568 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, J.G., Zhou, Q., Guo, Q., Yang, Z.H., Xie, F., Han, J.T.: Knowledge diffusion of dynamical network in terms of interaction frequency. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 10755 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, H., Wang, J., Ding, L., Wei, W.: Knowledge transmission model with consideration of self-learning mechanism in complex networks. Appl. Math. Comput. 304, 83–92 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Darr, E.D., Kurtzberg, T.R.: An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82(1), 28–44 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Szulanski, G.: The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82(1), 9–27 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Argote, L., Ingram, P.: Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82(1), 150–169 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tamer Cavusgil, S., Calantone, R.J., Zhao, Y.: Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 18(1), 6–21 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bartol, K.M., Srivastava, A.: Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems. J. Leadersh. Organ. Studies 9(1), 64–76 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gurteen, D.: Creating a knowledge sharing culture. Knowl. Manag. Magaz. 2(5), 1–4 (1999)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolChengdu University of TechnologyChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Management SchoolSichuan University of Science and EngineeringZigongPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations