Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 3, pp 6647–6656 | Cite as

Study on seismic safety evaluation of water supply pipeline networks

  • Qian LiEmail author
  • Endong Guo
  • Tianyang Yu


The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the seismic safety of water supply pipeline networks. It proposes a definition of seismic safety of water supply pipeline networks based on research results regarding seismic damage prediction and functional failure analysis of such networks, referring to the basic concept of safety. The definition proposes restrictive criteria and finality criteria. This paper establishes a division standard for the seismic safety level of a water supply pipeline networks. It establishes a preliminary evaluation method and model of the seismic safety of the water supply pipeline networks in combination with a seismic damage prediction model and functional failure analysis model. It makes it possible to evaluate whether a water supply pipeline networks meets the current seismic specification requirements. This evaluation method can also provide a scientific basis for urban earthquake disaster reduction and reconstruction. Finally, with this method, the water supply pipeline networks seismic safety is evaluated for Harbin and corresponding suggestions are put forward.


Water supply pipeline networks Seismic safety Grade division Safety evaluation 



The financial support from the Scientific Research Program of Seismological Industry with Special Funds No.201508023 and the Program of “12th Five-year Plan” National Science and Technology Support Plan No.2015BAK17B05 are gratefully acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Brozovic, N., Sunding, D.L., Zilberman, D.: Estimating business and residential water supply interruption losses from catastrophic events. Water Res. Res. 43(8), 1–14 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nigg, J.: Perceptions of earthquake impacts and loss- reduction policy preferences among community residents and option leaders. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Delaware (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fournier D’Albe, E.M.: Objectives of volcanic monitoring and prediction. J. Geol. Soc. 136, 321–326 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Disaster Risk Management Association. Disaster Risk and Vulnerability. Accessed 19 Sept 2013
  5. 5.
    United States Agency for International Development. introduction to disaster risk reduction. Washington DC, (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lv, D., Yu, X., Song, P., et al.: From the wenchuan earthquake reflections on the seismic safety, vulnerability and robustness of structures. In: Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Mitigating Earthquake Disasters Marking the First Anniversary of the Wenchuan Earthquake, Beijing, pp. 276–287 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lv, M., Wang, J., Zhang, H.: Comprehensive safety evaluation method for urban water supply networks. J. Hydraul. Eng. 40(12), 1489–1494 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, Z., Su, J., Wang, W., et al.: Study on safety evaluation methods for water distribution networks based on LS-SVM. China Saf. Sci. J. 20(11), 119–123 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, W., Hou, B., Tian, J., et al.: Method for assessment of seismic safety of urban water distribution system using stochastic simulation and triangular fuzzy numbers. China Civil Eng. J. 46(2), 278–281 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, C.: Seismic safety summary of lifeline engineering. Yinshan Acad. J. 30(1), 145–146 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shi, P.: Seismic response modeling of water supply system. Cornell University, Ithaca (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, Y., Au, S.K.: Spatial distribution of water supply reliability and critical links of water supply to crucial water consumers under an earthquake. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(2), 534–541 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, Y., Au, S.K., Fu, Q.: Seismic risk assessment and mitigation of water supply systems. Earthq. Spectra 26(1), 257–274 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, W.: A software tool for reliability, analysis, and security assessment of water distribution systems. In: Proceedings of ICPTT, Wuhan, pp. 48–55 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    UNISDR. Disaster Risk. (2009). Accessed 22 Sept 2013
  16. 16.
    Hu, Y.: Earthquake Engineering, 2nd edn. Seismological Press, Beijing (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. Code for Seismic Design of Outdoor Water Supply Sewerage, Gas and Heating Engineering (GB 50032- 2003), (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. Classification of Earthquake Damage to Lifeline Engineering (GB/T24336-2009), (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hwang, H., Lin, H., Shinozuka, M.: Seismic performance assessment of water delivery system. J. Infra. Sys. ASCE 4(3), 118–125 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Song, R.: How to prevent the leakage of water supply systems. China Building Industry Press, p. 7 (1988)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ballantyne, D.B., Berg, E., Kennrdy, J., Reneau, R, Wu, D.: Earthquake loss estimation modeling of the seattle water system. Report of US.Geological Survey, (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake AdministrationHarbinChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake AdministrationHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations