Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 2, pp 3621–3641 | Cite as

A fuzzy multi-objective immune genetic algorithm for the strategic location planning problem

  • Xiao Zhao
  • Xuhui Xia
  • Lei WangEmail author
  • Jianhua Cao
Article

Abstract

The distribution center (DC) location problem is one of the most important decisions for logistics systems. Owing to vague concept frequently represented in decision data, some new multiple criteria based decision-making model is proposed to solve the DC location problem with significant time-effectiveness under fuzzy environment. In the proposed model, we consider time penalty cost, operation cost, damage cost, infrastructure, market conditions, government policy, technical conditions and land resources from a comprehensive view. Meanwhile, trapezoidal fuzzy numbers are used to describe the delivery time window and the service level. Then, intuitionistic fuzzy sets and immune genetic algorithm are utilized to solve the model. Finally, a numerical example is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Keywords

Supply chain Location Fuzzy trapezoidal fuzzy numbers Intuitionistic fuzzy sets Immune genetic algorithm 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author wishes to acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 71471143), Center of Service Science and Engineering (Wuhan University of Science and Technology) Opening Foundation (Project No. CSSE2017KA04), and Hubei Key Laboratory for Efficient Utilization and Agglomeration of Metallurgic Mineral Resources (Wuhan University of Science and Technology) Opening Foundation (Project No. 2016zy013). Thanks for all the authors of the references who gives us inspirations and helps. The authors are grateful to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuables comments that improved the quality of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Döyen, A., Aras, N., Barbarosoğlu, G.: A two-echelon stochastic facility location model for humanitarian relief logistics. Optim. Lett. 6(6), 1123–1145 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pishvaee, M.S., Farahani, R.Z., Dullaert, W.: A memetic algorithm for bi-objective integrated forward/reverse logistics network design. Comput. Oper. Res. 37(6), 1100–1112 (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alp, O., Erkut, E., Drezne, Z.: An efficient genetic algorithm for the p-median problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 122(1–4), 21–42 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kengpol, A.: Design of a decision support system to evaluate logistics distribution network in Greater Mekong Subregion Countries. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 115(2), 388–399 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joshi, R., Banwet, D.K., Shankar, R.: A Delphi–AHP–TOPSIS based benchmarking framework for performance improvement of a cold chain. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 10170–10182 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z.: Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics. Inform. Manag 16(6), 382–394 (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boran, F.E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., et al.: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(8), 11363–11368 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, L., Yuan, X.-H., Xia, Z.-Q.: Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 73(1), 84–88 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diabat, A., Kannan, D., Kaliyan, M., Svetinovic, D.: An optimization model for product returns using genetic algorithms and artificial immune system. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 74, 156–169 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu, X.-d.: Research on immune genetic algorithm for solving the job-shop scheduling problem. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 34(7–8), 783–789 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garg, H.: A new generalized improved score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and applications in expert systems. Appl. Soft Comput. 38(6), 988–999 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zandieh, M., Fatemi Ghomi, S.M.T., Moattar Husseini, S.M.: An immune algorithm approach to hybrid flow shops scheduling with sequence-dependent setup times. Appl. Math. Comput. 180(1), 111–127 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S.: A hybrid approach integrating Affinity Diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning. Appl. Math. Model. 36(2), 573–584 (2012)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bouhana, A., Chabchoub, H., Abed, M., et al.: A multi-criteria decision making approach based on fuzzy theory and fuzzy preference relations for urban distribution centers’ location selection under uncertain environments. In: International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport, pp 556–561. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen, C.-T.: A fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 118(1), 65–73 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cengiz, K., Ruan, D., Doǧan, I.: Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Inf. Sci. 157(1), 135–153 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cai, X., Chen, J., Xiao, Y., Xu, X., Yu, G.: Fresh-product supply chain management with logistics outsourcing. Omega 41(4), 752–765 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xiaopeng, G., Xifei,  Y.: Low carbon distribution center’s location decision method under carbon emissions constraint condition. J. Appl. Sci. 13(11), 1988–1991 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo, H.Y., Li, Z.L.: Structural damage identification based on Bayesian theory and improved immune genetic algorithm. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(7), 6426–6434 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    von der Gracht, H.A., Darkow, I.-L.: Scenarios for the logistics services industry: a Delphi-based analysis for 2025. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 127(1), 46–59 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Devi, K.: Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(11), 14163–14168 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li, D.F.: Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 70(1), 73–85 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Miguel, L., Bustince, H., Fernandez, J., et al.: Construction of admissible linear orders for interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets with an application to decision making. Inf. Fusion 27, 189–197 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    de Keizer, M., Akkerman, R., Grunow, M.: Logistics network design for perishable products with heterogeneous quality decay. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262(2), 535–549 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qing-dao-er-ji, R., Wang, Y.: A new hybrid genetic algorithm for job shop scheduling problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 39(10), 2291–2299 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xu, Z.-s., Chen, J.: Approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic judgment matrices. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 27(4), 126–133 (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ye, J.: Fuzzy decision-making method based on the weighted correlation coefficient under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 205(1), 202–204 (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yu, Y., Xiao, T.: Pricing and cold-chain service level decisions in a fresh agri-products supply chain with logistics outsourcing. Comput. Ind. Eng. 111, 56–66 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E.K.: A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS-F). Case study: the analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location. Transport 25(4), 423–432 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao Zhao
    • 1
    • 3
  • Xuhui Xia
    • 1
  • Lei Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jianhua Cao
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Equipment and Control Technology (Wuhan University of Science and Technology)Ministry of EducationWuhanChina
  2. 2.Center of Service Science and EngineeringWuhan University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  3. 3.School of Mechanical EngineeringHubei University of Arts and ScienceXiangyangChina

Personalised recommendations