Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 4, pp 9209–9227 | Cite as

Research on the strategic alliance innovation system evolution mechanism: the perspective of knowledge flow

  • Jianyu ZhaoEmail author
  • Luan Dong
  • Xi XiEmail author
Article
  • 187 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, a new framework was established for studying the evolution of strategic alliance innovation system. Based on data from 514 questionnaires, knowledge absorption capacity, knowledge potential, and knowledge transfer capacity were extracted to constitute variables for strategic alliance innovation system, and incentive mechanism was taken as a control variable for system evolution. A dynamic system evolution model was established based on the correlations between variables, for the purpose of analyzing correlations between knowledge absorption capacity, knowledge potential, knowledge transfer capacity and their evolution trends under incentives of different intensities. The following findings were obtained: Incentive mechanism can promote the evolution of strategic alliance innovation system, and strong incentives can shorten the cycle of system evolution. In the evolution of strategic alliance innovation system, knowledge absorption capacity is a core variable dominating system evolution and is positively correlated with knowledge transfer capacity. The gap between knowledge sources and recipients gradually narrows, and there is a critical value of knowledge potential for improving knowledge absorption capacity and knowledge transfer capacity. Under the premise of enhanced knowledge absorption capacity, the evolution of the innovation system is more stable when knowledge transfer capacity and knowledge potential reach a relatively balance state.

Keywords

Strategic alliance Innovation system Evolution Knowledge flow Knowledge absorption capacity Incentive mechanism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article has been partly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (IDs: 71602041, 71602042); National Social Science Key Project of China (ID: 14AGL004); Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (ID: QC2017082); Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (ID: 14YJC630142); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (ID: HEUCF170904).

References

  1. 1.
    Adobor, H., McMullen, R.S.: Strategic purchasing and supplier partnerships-the role of a third party organization. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 20(4), 263–272 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Azzawi, S.F.: Stability and bifurcation of pan chaotic system by using Routh-Hurwitz and Gardan methods. Appl. Math. Comput. 219(3), 1144–1152 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amaldoss, W., Staelin, R.: Cross-function and same-function alliances: how does alliance structure affect the behavior of partnering firms? Manag. Sci. 56(2), 302–317 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arora, A., Athreye, S., Huang, C.: The paradox of openness revisited: collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators. Res. Policy 45(7), 1352–1361 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.D.: The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489), 1390–1396 (1981)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barney, J.B.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 110–120 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bengtsson, M., Kock, S.: :“Coopetition” in business networks-to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Ind. Mark. Manag. 29(5), 411–426 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bishop, K., D’Este, P., Neely, A.: Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Res. Policy 40(1), 30–40 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blomqvist, K., Hurmelinna, P., Seppänen, R.: Playing the collaboration game right-balancing trust and contracting. Technovation 25(5), 497–504 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouncken, R.B., Fredrich, V.: Business model innovation in alliances: successful configurations. J. Bus. Res. 69(9), 3584–3590 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bouncken, R.B., Pesch, R., Gudergan, S.P.: Strategic embeddedness of modularity in alliances: innovation and performance implications. J. Bus. Res. 68(7), 1388–1394 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bouncken, R.B., Pesch, R., Reuschl, A.: Copoiesis: mutual knowledge creation in alliances. J. Innov. Knowl. 1(1), 44–50 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caniëls, M.C.J., Verspagen, B.: Barriers to knowledge spillovers and regional convergence in an evolutionary model. J. Evolut. Econ. 11(3), 307–329 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chellappa, R.K., Saraf, N.: Alliances, rivalry, and firm performance in enterprise systems software markets : a social network approach. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 849–871 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Q. 35, 128–152 (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J.: Determinants of timeliness in product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 11(5), 381–396 (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Das, T.K., Teng, B.-S.: Resource and risk management in the strategic alliance making process. J. Manag. 24(1), 21–42 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., Tidd, J.: Overcoming the false dichotomy between internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition: absorptive capacity dynamics over time. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 104, 57–65 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desyllas, P., Sako, M.: Profiting from business model innovation: evidence from pay-as-you-drive auto industry. Res. Policy 42(1), 101–116 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dirk, C., Georg, L.: Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy: the case of Eastern Germany. Econ. Transit. 14(1), 101–131 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dyer, B., Singh, H.: The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of inter organizational competitive advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(4), 660–679 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fang, E.: The effect of strategic alliance knowledge complementarity on new product innovativeness in China. Organ. Sci. 22(1), 158–172 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fang, S.-C., Yang, C.-W., Hsu, W.-Y.: Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: the perspective of knowledge governance. J. Knowl. Manag. 17(6), 943–957 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ferreras-Méndez, J.L., Fernández-Mesa, A., Alegre, J.: The relationship between knowledge search strategies and absorptive capacity: a deeper look. Technovation 54, 48–61 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fink, K., Roithmayr, F.: Knowledge potential measurement-theoretical framework and case studies. In: Hawamdeh, S. (ed.) Knowledge Management: Nurturing Culture, Innovation and Technology. World Scientific, New Jersey (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Frankort, H.T.W.: When does knowledge acquisition in R&D alliances increase new product development? The moderating roles of technological relatedness and product-market competition. Res. Policy 45(1), 291–302 (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gebrekidan, D.A., Awuah, G.B.: Interorganizational cooperation: a new view of strategic alliances: the case of Swedish firms in the international market. Ind. Mark. Manag. 31(8), 679–693 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Genç, N., Öykü İyigün, N.: The role of organizational learning and knowledge transfer in building strategic alliances: a case study. Proc Social Behav Sci 24, 1124–1133 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gerwin, D., Ferris, J.S.: Organizing new product development projects in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 15(1), 22–37 (2004)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gomes, E., Barnes, B.R., Mahmood, T.: A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals. Int. Bus. Rev. 25(1), 15–27 (2016)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gravier, M.J., Randall, W.S., Strutton, D.: Investigating the role of knowledge in alliance performance. J. Knowl. Manag. 12(4), 117–130 (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., Tierney, T.: What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harv. Bus. Rev. 77(2), 106–116 (1999)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ho, M.H.-W., Wang, F.: Unpacking knowledge transfer and learning paradoxes in international strategic alliances: contextual differences matter. Int. Bus. Rev. 25(1), 287–297 (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hohberger, J., Almeida, P., Parada, P.: The direction of firm innovation: the contrasting roles of strategic alliances and individual scientific collaborations. Res. Policy 44(8), 1473–1487 (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hynes, N., Wilson, J.: Co-evolutionary dynamics in strategic alliances: the influence of the industry lifecycle. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 79(6), 1169–1175 (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Im, G.-Y., Rai, A.: Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Manag. Sci. 54(7), 1281–1296 (2008)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Inkpen, A.C., Tsang, E.W.K.: Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Acad. Manag. Rev. 30(1), 146–165 (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jansen, J.J.P., Van de Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Manag. J. 48(3), 999–1015 (2005)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jantunen, A.: Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 8(3), 336–349 (2005)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jiang, X., Bao, Y.C., Xie, Y., Gao, S.X.: Partner trustworthiness, knowledge flow in strategic alliances, and firm competitiveness: a contingency perspective. J. Bus. Res. 69(2), 804–814 (2016)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jiang, X., Jiang, F.-F., Cai, X.-L., Liu, H.: How does trust affect alliance performance? The mediating role of resource sharing. Ind. Mark. Manag. 45, 128–138 (2015)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kasahara, H., Shimotsu, K., Suzuki, M.: Does an R&D tax credit affect R&D expenditure? The Japanese R&D tax credit reform in 2003. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 31, 72–97 (2014)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kauser, S., Shaw, V.: The influence of behavioral and organization characteristics on the success of international strategic alliances. Int. Mark. Rev. 21(1), 17–52 (2004)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Khamseh, H.M., Jolly, D.R.: Knowledge transfer in alliances: determinant factors. J. Knowl. Manag. 12(1), 37–50 (2008)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Koza, M.P., Lewin, A.Y.: The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 9(3), 255–264 (1998)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lakpetch, P., Lorsuwannarat, T.: Knowledge transfer effectiveness of university-industry alliances. Int. J. Org. Anal. 20(2), 128–186 (2012)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lane, P.J., Lubatkin, M.: Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strat. Manag. J. 19(5), 461–477 (1998)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., Sparks, J.: The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 9(3), 285–305 (1998)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lau, A.K.W., Lo, W.: Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: an empirical study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 92, 99–114 (2015)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lavie, D., Miller, S.R.: Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 19(4), 623–646 (2008)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lee, Y.S.: Technology transfer and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Res. Policy 25(6), 843–863 (1996)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lichtenthaler, U.: Determinants of absorptive capacity: the value of technology and market orientation for external knowledge acquisition. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 31(5), 600–610 (2016)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Liu, M.-S.: Impact of knowledge incentive mechanisms on individual knowledge creation behavior: an empirical study for Taiwanese R&D professionals. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 32(5), 442–450 (2012)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Luo, Y.: Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures. Strateg. Manag. J. 23(10), 903–919 (2002)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Luo, Y., Oded, S., Haresh, A.: Predicting and measuring alliance performance: a multidimensional analysis. Strateg. Manag. J. 29(5), 545–556 (2008)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Maietta, O.W.: Determinants of university-firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: a perspective from a low-tech industry. Res. Policy 44(7), 1341–1359 (2015)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Massey, A.P.: Unraveling the temporal fabric of knowledge conversion: a model of media selection and use. MIS Q. 30(1), 99–114 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Moorman, C., Miner, A.S.: The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. J. Mark. Res. 34(1), 91–106 (1997)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Musarra, G., Robson, M.J., Katsikeas, C.S.: The influence of desire for control on monitoring decisions and performance outcomes in strategic alliances. Ind. Mark. Manag. 55, 10–21 (2016)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Oh, E.-T., Chen, K.-M., Wang, L.-M., Liu, R.-J.: Value creation in regional innovation systems: the case of Taiwan’s machine tool enterprises. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 100, 118–129 (2015)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Owen, S., Yawson, A.: Information asymmetry and international strategic alliances. J. Bank. Financ. 37(10), 3890–3903 (2013)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Oxley, J., Wada, T.: Alliance structure and the scope of knowledge transfer: evidence from U.S.-Japan agreements. Manag. Sci. 55(4), 635–649 (2009)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Panteli, N., Sockalingam, S.: Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organization alliances: framework for facilitating knowledge sharing. Decis. Support Syst. 39(4), 559–617 (2005)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Prabhu, J.C., Chandy, R.K., Ellis, M.E.: The impact of acquisitions on innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? J. Market. 69(1), 114–130 (2005)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rayna, T., Striukova, L.: University-industry knowledge exchange: an exploratory study of open innovation in UK universities. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 18(4), 471–492 (2015)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Robson, M.J., Katsikeas, C.S., Bello, D.C.: Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: the role of organizational complexity. Organ. Sci. 19(4), 647–665 (2008)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Roels, G., Tang, C.S.: Win-win capacity allocation contracts in coproduction and codistribution alliances. Manag. Sci. 63(3), 861–881 (2016)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rossi, F.: The governance of university-industry knowledge transfer. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 13(2), 155–171 (2010)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rothaermel, F.T.: Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strateg. Manag. J. 22(6–7), 687–699 (2001)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Ryu, C., Kim, Y.J., Chaudhury, A., Rao, H.R.: Knowledge acquisition via three learning processes in enterprise information portals: learning-by-investment, learning-by-doing, and learning-from-others. MIS Q. 29(2), 245–278 (2005)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sciascia, S., D’Oria, L., Bruni, M., Larrañeta, B.: Entrepreneurial orientation in low-and medium-tech industries: the need for absorptive capacity to increase performance. Eur. Manag. J. 32(5), 761–769 (2014)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Szulanski, G.: The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82(1), 9–27 (2000)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Tseng, C.-Y., Pai, D.C., Hung, C.-H.: Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in KIBS. J. Knowl. Manag. 15(6), 971–983 (2011)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Velu, C.: Business model innovation and third-party alliance on the survival of new firms. Technovation 35, 1–11 (2015)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wu, W.Y., Shin, H.-A., Chan, H.-C.: The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3), 4646–4653 (2009)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Yaprak, A.: Dynamic learning and strategic alliances: a commentary essay. J. Bus. Res. 64(10), 1128–1130 (2011)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Zahra, S.A., George, G.: Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27(2), 185–203 (2002)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Zander, U., Kogut, B.: Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empiricaltest. Organ. Sci. 6(1), 76–92 (1995)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zhao, J.Y., Xi, X., Su, Y.: Resource allocation under a strategic alliance: How a cooperative network with knowledge flow spurs co-evolution. Knowl.-Based Syst. 89, 497–508 (2015)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Zollo, M., Reuer, J.J., Singh, H.: Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 13(6), 701–713 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.DUT Faculty of Management and EconomicsDalian University of TechnologyDalianPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of ManagementHarbin University of CommerceHarbinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations