Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 2, pp 4299–4306 | Cite as

Black–Litterman asset allocation model based on principal component analysis (PCA) under uncertainty

  • Ding LeiEmail author
Article
  • 149 Downloads

Abstract

In order to improve the prediction accuracy of asset allocation model, the Black–Litterman (BL) asset allocation model based on principal component analysis (PCA) under uncertainty is proposed in the thesis. Firstly, the main idea and calculative process of BL model are introduced, and the BL model formula under uncertainty is inferred, then the BL model principle and main steps under uncertainty are provided; secondly, the BL model is subject to the comprehensive evaluation through the introduction of PCA, and the model coefficients of BL model PCA is subject to the assignment through analytic hierarchy process so as to improve the prediction accuracy of the asset allocation model; finally, the effectiveness of the algorithm mentioned is verified based on the positive analysis on data of Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 indexes and Shanghai and Shenzhen industry indexes.

Keywords

Black–Litterman model Uncertainty Principal component analysis (PCA) Asset allocation 

References

  1. 1.
    Yan, Q.Y., Liu, Y.Q.: A predictive dynamic neural network model based on principal component analysis (PCA) and its application. Appl. Mech. Mater. 127(3), 19–24 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tripathi, S., Rao, S.G.: Engaging uncertainty in hydrologic data sets using principal component analysis: BaNPCA algorithm. Water Resour. Res. 44(10), 67–76 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allgood, G.O., Upadhyaya, B.R.: Model-based high-frequency matched filter arcing diagnostic system based on principal component analysis (PCA) clustering. In: Aerosense, vol. 2000, pp. 430–440. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Archer, J.K., Sudworth, C.D., Williams, R., et al.: Improvements in Alzheimer’ disease diagnosis using principal component analysis (PCA) in combination with Raman spectroscopy. In: European Conference on Biomedical Optics. Optical Society of America (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allemang, R., Spottswood, M., Eason, T.: A principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition based validation metric for use with full field measurement situations. In: Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, vol. 3, pp. 249–263. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qiao, X.: Chen Y W (2011) A statistical texture model of the liver based on generalized N-dimensional principal component analysis (GND-PCA) and 3D shape normalization. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2011(6), 601672 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, H.W., Kim, T.K., Kee, S.C., et al.: Method and apparatus of recognizing face using component-based 2nd-order principal component analysis (PCA)/independent component analysis (ICA). US, US7254257 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore, B.: Principal component analysis in linear systems: controllability. observability, and model reduction. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 26, 17–32 (1981)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fujiwara, Y., Souma, W., Murasato, H., et al.: Application of PCA and random matrix theory to passive fund management. Pract. Fruits Econophys. 2006, 226–230 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Falkenstein, E., Bank, K., Hanweck, J.: Minimizing basis risk from non-parallel shifts in the yield curve. Part II: Principal components Eric Falkenstein KeyCorp Bank. J. Fixed Income 6(1), 60–68 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dempster, M.A.H., Tang, K.: Estimating exponential affine models with correlated measurement errors: applications to fixed income and commodities. J. Bank. Finance 35(3), 639–652 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Almeida, C., Ardison, K.M.M., Kubudi, D.: Approximating risk premium on a parametric arbitrage-free term structure model. Braz. Rev. Econ. 34(2), 203 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Driessen, J., Melenberg, B., Nijman, T.: Common factors in international bond returns. J. Int. Money Finance 22(5), 629–656 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galluccio, S., Roncoroni, A.: A new measure of cross-sectional risk and its empirical implications for portfolio risk management. J. Bank. Finance 30(8), 2387–2408 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gupta, R., Kabundi, A., Miller, S.M.: Using large data sets to forecast housing prices: a case study of twenty US states. J. Hous. Res. 20(2), 161–190 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Costantini, M., Cuaresma, J.C., Hlouskova, J.: Forecasting errors, directional accuracy and profitability of currency trading: the case of EUR/USD exchange rate. J. Forecast. 35(7), 652–668 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamza, R., Muhammad, K., Arunkumar, N., González, G.R.: Hash based encryption for keyframes of diagnostic hysteroscopy. IEEE Access (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2762405
  18. 18.
    Fernandes, S.L., Gurupur, V.P., Sunder, N.R., Arunkumar, N., Kadry, S.: A novel nonintrusive decision support approach for heart rate measurement. Pattern Recogn. Lett. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2017.07.002
  19. 19.
    Arunkumar, N., Ramkumar, K., Venkatraman, V., Abdulhay, E., Fernandes, S.L., Kadry, S., Segal, S.: Classification of focal and non focal EEG using entropies. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 94, 112–117 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematical SciencesHarbin Normal UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations