Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 5, pp 11929–11939 | Cite as

Optimized fuzzy technique for enhancing sentiment analysis

  • S. MadhusudhananEmail author
  • M. Moorthi
Article

Abstract

Sentiment analysis otherwise known as opinion mining is a result of the increased use of internet along with the sudden spurt of online review sites and social media. Sentiment or opinion mainly depends upon what general public think or comment and this generally includes products, services, policies and even politics where they opine either positively or negatively, and the opinion is shared by users of a particular product or service. The amount of data generated is huge and analysis of the same falls under the category of big data. In general, opinions are fuzzy in nature and extracting the true sentiment involves many challenges and requires effective methods in extracting and summarizing people’s views. Fuzzy logic helps in classifying sentiments with correct strength designated to every opinion level which in turn increases the accuracy of classification. Shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) denotes a metaheuristic mechanism of optimization which imitates the mimetic evolutionary activity of frogs searching for a place which possesses most quantity of food. In the current work a hybrid SFLA is utilized for sentiment analysis alongside 2-OPT local search algorithm, for the purpose of reviewing books. The proposed method is deployed in cloud using MapReduce. Outcomes from experiments show the efficacy of the suggested technique.

Keywords

Opinion mining Feature selection Fuzzy classifier Shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) and improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm (ISFLA) 

References

  1. 1.
    Haque, M.: Sentiment analysis by using fuzzy logic. arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.3185 (2014)
  2. 2.
    El-Halees, A.: Arabic opinion mining using combined classification approach (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asghar, M.Z., Khan, A., Ahmad, S., Kundi, F.M.: A review of feature extraction in sentiment analysis. J. Basic Appl. Sci. Res. 4(3), 181–186 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charton, E., Meurs, M.J., Jean-Louis, L., Gagnon, M.: Using collaborative tagging for text classification: from text classification to opinion mining. Informatics 1(1), 32–51 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mishra, N., Jha, C.K.: Classification of opinion mining techniques. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 56(13), 1–6 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalaivani, P., Shunmuganathan, K.L.: Sentiment classification of movie reviews by supervised machine learning approaches. Indian J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 4(4), 285–292 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fu, G., Wang, X.: Chinese sentence-level sentiment classification based on fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, pp. 312–319. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mouthami, K., Devi, K.N., Bhaskaran, V.M.: Sentiment analysis and classification based on textual reviews. In: Information Communication and Embedded Systems (ICICES), 2013 International Conference on IEEE, pp. 271–276. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jusoh, S., Alfawareh, H.M.: Applying fuzzy sets for opinion mining. In: Computer Applications Technology (ICCAT), 2013 International Conference on IEEE, pp. 1–5. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ali, F., Kwak, K.S., Kim, Y.G.: Opinion mining based on fuzzy domain ontology and support vector machine: a proposal to automate online review classification. Appl. Soft Comput. 47, 235–250 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar, P.S., Kathiravan, A.V.: An efficient product hybrid feature classification on opinion mining using ant optimization rule. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Inf. 4(4), (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hai, Z., Chang, K., Kim, J.J., Yang, C.C.: Identifying features in opinion mining via intrinsic and extrinsic domain relevance. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26(3), 623–634 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, H., Sekhari, A., Ouzrout, Y., Bouras, A.: Jointly identifying opinion mining elements and fuzzy measurement of opinion intensity to analyze product features. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 47, 122–139 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Onan, A., Korukoglu, S.: Ensemble methods for opinion mining. In: Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), 2015 23th, pp. 212–215. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    RahmathP, H., Ahmad, T.: Fuzzy based sentiment analysis of online product reviews using machine learning techniques. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 99(17), 9–16 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blitzer, J., Dredze, M., Pereira, F.: Biographies, bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders: domain adaptation for sentiment classification. InACL 7, 440–447 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Angulakshmi, G., ManickaChezian, R.: An analysis on opinion mining: techniques and tools. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 3(7), 2319–5940 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Isabella, J., Suresh, R.: Analysis and evaluation of feature selectors in opinion mining. Indian J. Comput. Sci. Eng. (IJCSE) 3(6) (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, S., Li, D., Song, X., Wei, Y., Li, H.: A feature selection method based on improved fisher’s discriminant ratio for text sentiment classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(7), 8696–8702 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Samuel, G.G., Rajan, C.C.A.: A modified shuffled frog leaping algorithm for long-term generation maintenance scheduling. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving, pp. 11–24. Springer, India (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riza, L.S., Bergmeir, C.N., Herrera, F., Benítez Sánchez, J.M.: frbs: fuzzy rule-based systems for classification and regression in R. American Statistical Association (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen, C.C.: Design of PSO-based fuzzy classification systems. Tamkang J. Sci. Eng. 9(1), 63–70 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Samuel, G.G., Rajan, C.C.A.: Hybrid: particle swarm optimization-genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization-shuffled frog leaping algorithm for long-term generator maintenance scheduling. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 65, 432–442 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anna UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringPrathyusha Engineering CollegeChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations