Repeated game analysis of power suppliers based on dynamic coopetition process and slightly altruistic factor
- 178 Downloads
Abstract
In this paper, based on repeated game theory, the dynamic coopetition game model between power supply enterprises is established to analyze the long-term equilibrium from a more practical point of view. The slightly altruistic factor is used as a measurement of system cooperation degree, and the influence of the variation between slightly altruistic factor and discount rate is considered in the long-term dynamic equilibrium. The results show that only part of coopetition can find the feasible discount rate to maintain long-term equilibrium. The discount rate required by the identical altruistic relationship is relatively low and stable. The degree of altruistic difference between the two sides of the game decides the existence of the discount rate required for maintaining long-term dynamic equilibrium. This paper makes important generalization for the pre-existing equilibrium analysis method of power market and the general repeated game method, and has certain theoretical value and practical significance.
Keywords
Power market Slightly altruistic factor Coopetition equilibrium Repeated gameNotes
Funding
Joint funding project of GuiZhou University (QKHLH 20167424 and QKHLH 20167425); Guizhou Science and Technology Hall’s project (QKHGY20113022); National Natural Science Foundation of China (71361003 and 11761023).
References
- 1.Yu D.Y., Jun, Liang, Han, X.S.: Generation cost analysis for power plants under the deregulated environment. In: Power System Technology, 2004 International Conference, pp. 21–24Google Scholar
- 2.Wei, L.: Cost analysis and biding strategy for generation enterprises under electricity market. North China Electric Power University, Beijing (2010)Google Scholar
- 3.Zhongfu, T., Jinliang, Z.: Day-ahead electricity price forecasting based on multi-factor wavelet analysis and multivariate time series models. J. Chin. Electr. Eng. Sci. 30(1), 103–110 (2010)Google Scholar
- 4.Jiajia, D., Yuansheng, H.: Day-ahead electricity price forecasting using time series model based on nonparametric generalized auto regressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Power Syst. Technol. 36(4), 190–196 (2012)Google Scholar
- 5.Ying-yi, H., Chuan-fang, L.: A Neuron-fuzzy price forecasting approach in deregulated electricity markets. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 73(2), 151–157 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Qiyu, T., Maolin, Z.: Electricity price forecasting using wavelet neural networks optimized by GA. Proc. CSU-EPSA 23(3), 157–160 (2011)Google Scholar
- 7.Gaofeng, X., Peng, H., et al.: Application of time series decomposition to short-term electricity price analysis and forecasting. Proc. CSU-EPSA 23(3), 95–100 (2011)Google Scholar
- 8.Jinliang, Z., Zhongfu, T., et al.: Short term electricity price forecasting of combined chaotic method. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 19(2), 133–139 (2011)Google Scholar
- 9.Soleymani, S., Ranjba, A.M., Shirani, A.R.: New approach to bidding strategies of generating companies in day ahead energy market. Energy Convers. Manag. 49(8), 1439–1499 (2008)Google Scholar
- 10.Chunjie, L., Junyou, W., et al.: Biding strategy of generators based on bayesian learning model. East China Electr. Power 38(5), 0627–0631 (2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Xiaohong, K., Xinshun, M.: Optimal bidding strategies for generation companies under partial information probability distribution. Electr. Power Sci. Eng. 27(9), 47–50 (2011)Google Scholar
- 12.Weiss, J.: Market power issues in the restructuring of the electricity industry: an experimental investigation. Working Paper of the Harvard Business School, Harvard University. http://kspwww.Harvard.edu/hepg/jurgen2.html
- 13.Haining, W.: Study on power market simulation and its application system based on the multi-agent modeling of complex adaptive system. Graduate School of China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing (2013)Google Scholar
- 14.Wen, F.S., David, A.K.: Oligopoly electricity market production under incomplete information. IEEE Power Eng. Rev. 21(4), 58–61 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Zhiqiang, Y., Zhijian, H., Chuanwen, J., et al.: Analysis of Cournot equilibrium in electricity market. Power Syst. Technol. 27(12), 6–9 (2003)Google Scholar
- 16.Bautista, G., Anjos, M.F., Vannelli, A.: Formulation of oligopolistic competition in AC power networks: an NLP approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(1), 105–115 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kian, A.R., Cruz, J.B., Thomas, R.J.: Bidding strategies in oligopolistic dynamic electricity double-sided auctions. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20(1), 50–58 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Shaohua, Z., Xian, W., et al.: Integration of Genco’s risk preference in cournot equilibrium analysis of electricity markets. Power Syst. Technol. 35(9), 176–180 (2011)Google Scholar
- 19.Gan, D., Shen, C.: A price competition model for power and reserve market auctions. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 70(3), 187–193 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Haiyun, T., Li, Y., Yingchen, L., Deqiang, G.: Analysis of the stability of electricity markets equilibrium based on dynamic game theory. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 31(24), 21–24 (2007)Google Scholar
- 21.Haghighat, H., Seifi, H., Kian, A.: Gaming analysis in joint energy and spinning reserve markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24(4), 2074–2085 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Bautista, G., Anjos, M.F., Vannelli, A.: Numerical study of affine supply function equilibrium in AC network-constrained markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(3), 1174–1184 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Ming, Z., Yuping, W., et al.: Integration of Genco’s risk preference in Cournot equilibrium analysis of electricity markets. East China Electr. Power 42(10), 2181–2185 (2014)Google Scholar
- 24.Day, C.J., Hobbs, B.F., Pang, J.S.: Oligopolistic competition in power networks: a conjectured supply function approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27(3), 597–607 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Latorre, M., Granville, S.: The Stackelberg equilibrium applied to AC power-systems—a non-interior point algorithm. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 18(2), 611–618 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Brandenburger, A.M., Nalebuff, B.J.: Coopetition: a revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation in the marketplace. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1996)Google Scholar
- 27.Luo, Y.: A coopetition perspective of global competition. J. World Bus. 42(2), 129–144 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Walley, K.: Coopetition: an introducation to the subject and an agenda for research. Int. Stud. Manag. Org. 37(1), 11–31 (2007)Google Scholar
- 29.Wilhelm, M.M.: Managing coopetition through horizontal supply chain relations: linking dyadic and network levels of analysis. J. Oper. Manag. 29(7–8), 663–676 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Baruch, Y., Lin, C.P.: All for one, one for all: coopetition and virtual team performance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79(6), 1155–1168 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Asgari, N., Farahani, R.Z., Goh, M.: Network design approach for hub ports-shipping companies competition and cooperation. Transp. Res. 48, 1–18 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Truong-Huu, T.: A novel model for competition and cooperation among cloud providers. Trans. Cloud Comput. 2(3), 251–265 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Kafi, F., Fatemi Ghomi, S.M.T.: A game-theoretic model to analyze value creation with simultaneous cooperation and competition of supply chain partners. Math. Prob. Eng. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/754038
- 34.Kim, S.: An adaptive smart grid management scheme based on the coopetition game model. ETRI J. 36(1), 80–88 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Liao, M.X., Xu, C.J., Tang, X.H.: Dynamical behaviors for a competition and cooperation model of enterprises with two delays. Nonlinear Dynam. 75(1–2), 257–266 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 36.Honglian, G., Yunxian, H., Baohong, Y.: Competitive & cooperation game-theory coordination model of three-hierarchy supply chain with M suppliers, 1 manufacturer and N retailors. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 16(6), 54–60 (2008)Google Scholar
- 37.Xianwu, H., Chunxian, T.: Modeling and solving for longitudinal coopetition game of supply chain with reference chain. Stat. Decis. 348(24), 46–49 (2011)Google Scholar
- 38.Ge, Z., Zhiqing, M., Qiying, H.: Competition and cooperation. Science Press, Beijing (2011)Google Scholar
- 39.Mingzhu, Y., Jun, S.: The multi-dimensional game about cooperation and competition in the regional port system. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 23(5), 93–100 (2014)Google Scholar
- 40.Benhai, G., Junqiang, L., Sifeng, L.: Evolutionary Game model on competition and cooperation between countries in land. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 23(12), 77–85 (2015)Google Scholar
- 41.Yang, F., Tianyi, G., Han, Q.: Competition and collaborative strategies within ports cluster in Huanghai Area—a Game theory approach. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 35(4), 953–964 (2015)Google Scholar
- 42.Marco, G., Morgan, J.: Slightly altruistic equilibria. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 137, 347–362 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 43.Yongjian, P., Zhe, Y.: Slightly altruistic weakly Pareto–Nash equilibrium. J. Syst. Sci. Math. Sci. 30(9), 1259–1266 (2010)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 44.Jian, Y.: Slightly altruistic equilibria of N-person noncooperative game. J. Syst. Sci. Math. Sci. 31(5), 534–539 (2011)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 45.Nengfa, W.: The existence of slightly altruistic equilibrium point in noncooperative games. J. Quant. Econom. 28(4), 11–14 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar