Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 5, pp 11271–11284 | Cite as

Quantization based wavelet transformation technique for digital image compression with removal of multiple artifacts and noises

  • S. Suresh KumarEmail author
  • H. Mangalam
Article
  • 211 Downloads

Abstract

A Morlet’s wavelet transformation based image compression and decompression (MWT-ICD) technique is proposed in order to enhance the performance of digital and gray scale image compression with higher compression ratio (CR) and to reduce the space complexity. The MWT-ICD technique initially performs preprocessing task to remove multiple artifacts and noises in digital and gray scale images with the application of generalized lapped orthogonal transforms and Wiener filter. This process results in improved quality of digital and gray scale images with higher PSNR for compression. Next, wavelet quantization transformation based image compression algorithm is developed in MWT-ICD Technique using Morlet’s wavelet transformation. Finally, quantized wavelet transformation based image decompression process is carried out in MWT-ICD technique with the objective of obtaining the reconstructed original image. The performance of MWT-ICD technique is measured in terms of CR, compression time (CT), and space complexity (SC), peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and compared with four existing methods. The experimental results show that the MWT-ICD technique is able to acquire higher CR and also reduced space complexity when compared to existing DCT-based image compression system based on Laplacian transparent composite model and multi-wavelet based compressed sensing technique

Keywords

Digital image generalized lapped orthogonal transforms Gray scale image Morlet’s wavelet transformation Preprocessing Wiener filter 

References

  1. 1.
    Sun, C., Yang, E.-H.: Efficient DCT-based image compression system based on Laplacian transparent composite model. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24(3), 886–900 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Qureshi, M.A., Deriche, M.: A new wavelet based efficient image compression algorithm using compressive sensing. Multimed. Tools Appl. 75(12), 6737–6754 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asghari, M.H., Jalali, B.: Discrete anamorphic transform for image compression. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 21(7), 829–833 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiranjeevi, K., Jena, U.R.: Image compression based on vector quantization using cuckoo search optimization technique. Ain Shams Eng. J. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2016.09.009
  5. 5.
    Xiao, B., Lu, G., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Wang, G.: Lossless image compression based on integer discrete Tchebichef transform. Neurocomputing 214, 587–593 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zuoa, Z., Lan, X., Deng, L., Yao, S., Wang, X.: An improved medical image compression technique with lossless region of interest. Optik Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 126(21), 2825–2831 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Talukder, K.H., Harada, K.: Haar wavelet based approach for image compression and quality assessment of compressed image. Int. J. Appl. Math. 36(1), 1–8 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siddeq, M.M., Rodrigues, M.A.: Novel image compression algorithm for high resolution 3D reconstruction. 3D Res. 5(7), 1–17 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    George, M., Thomas, M., Jayadas, C.K.: A methodology for spatial domain image compression based on Hops encoding. Proc. Technol. 25, 52–59 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yao, J., Liu, G.: A novel color image compression algorithm using the human visual contrast sensitivity characteristics. Photonic Sens. 7(1), 72–81 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fante, K.A., Bhaumik, B., Chatterjee, S.: Design and implementation of computationally efficient image compressor for wireless capsule endoscopy. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 35(5), 1677–1703 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bruylants, T., Munteanu, A., Schelkens, P.: Wavelet based volumetric medical image compression. Signal Process. Image Commun. 31, 112–133 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaur, K., Malhotra, S.: Image compression using HAAR wavelet transform and discrete cosine transform. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 125(11), 28–31 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu, S., Zhao, D., Wang, F.: Hybrid prediction and fractal hyperspectral image compression. Math. Probl. Eng. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/950357
  15. 15.
    Kumari, V., Thanushkodi, K.: Image compression using wavelet transform and graph cut algorithm. J. Theoret. Appl. Inf. Technol. 53(3), 437–445 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abo-Zahhad, M., RagabGharieb, R., Ahmed, S.M., Ellah, M.K.A.: Huffman image compression incorporating DPCM and DWT. J. Signal Inf. Process. 6, 123–135 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chowdhury, M.M.H., Khatun, A.: Image compression using discrete wavelet transform. IJCSI Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 9(4), 327–330 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gomathi, R., Antony Kumar, A.V.: A multiresolution image completion algorithm for compressing digital color images. J. Appl. Math. (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/757318
  19. 19.
    Gomathi, R., Antony Kumar, A.V.: Neural network technique for image compression. IET Image Process. 10(3), 222–226 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh, J., Kaur, H.: A compression artifacts reduction method in compressed image. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 140(3), 1–5 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringCoimbatore Institute of Engineering and TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringSri Ramakrishna Institute of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations