Cluster Computing

, Volume 22, Supplement 1, pp 1751–1763 | Cite as

A rational data delivery framework for disaster-inspired internet of nano-things (IoNT) in practice

  • Fadi Al-TurjmanEmail author


In this paper, we put forward a data delivery framework in nano-scale systems, where a number of nanosensors are disseminated over tiny areas such as small objects, plant roots, human bodies and the likes to help in disaster management. For our considered system, data is dispatched from varied subsystems through a nano-router, towards a gateway connected to a much larger system such as the Internet. Consequently, this makes our system suitable to be used for nano-scale disaster-inspired applications in the internet of nano things (IoNT). We look at the entire nanonetwork energy while selecting the next hop for the routed data packet while considering critical attributes in disastrous situations such as fairness in load distribution and time to repair. Our data delivery system considers IoNT-limitations related to the hop count and the amount of remaining energy level. Extensive simulations verified by testbed results in practice have been performed to show the effectiveness of the proposed data delivery approach in comparison to other energy-aware baseline approaches in the literature.


Data routing Energy-efficiency Internet of nano-things Nanonetworks 


  1. 1.
    NSTC/ NNI: (2012).
  2. 2.
    Chang, Y., MIT: MIT tech review (2008).
  3. 3.
    Arved, L., Christian, P.: Water, emergency vehicles and emergency equipment. In: Nanotechnology for Disaster Relief and Development Cooperation, Wiesbaden, Germany, 201, Ch. 2,5, pp. 27–47Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ali, S., Madani, S.: Distributed efficient multi hop clustering protocol for mobile sensor networks. Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol. 8(3), 302–309 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Turjman, F.: Optimized hexagon-based deployment for large-scale ubiquitous sensor networks. Springer J. Netw. Syst. Manag. (2017).
  6. 6.
    Nikolidakis, S.A., Kandris, D., Vergados, D.D., Douligeris, C.: Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks through balanced clustering. Algorithms 6, 29–42 (2013).
  7. 7.
    Pierobon, M., et al.: A routing framework for energy harvesting wireless nanosensor networks in the Terahertz Band. Wirel. Netw. 20(5), 1169–1183 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hasan, M.Z., Al-Turjman, F.: Evaluation of a duty-cycled asynchronous x-mac protocol for vehicular sensor networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. (2017).
  9. 9.
    Hasan, M.Z., Al-Rizzo, H., Al-Turjman, F.: A survey on multipath routing protocols for qos assurances in real-time multimedia wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 1, 1 (2017). Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hasan, M.Z., Al-Turjman, F., Al-Rizzo, H.: Optimized multi-constrained quality-of-service multipath routing approach for multimedia sensor networks. IEEE Sens. J. 17(7), 2298–2309 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Turjman, F.: Cognitive-node architecture and a deployment strategy for the future sensor networks. Springer Mobile Netw. Appl. (2017).
  12. 12.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Brunetti, F., Blázquez, C.: Nanonetworks: a new communication paradigm. Comput. Netw. 52(12), 2260–2279 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jornet, J.M.: Fundamentals of electromagnetic nanonetworks in the terahertz band. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Electrical and Computer Eng., Georgia Institute of Technology, USA, December (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liaskos, C., Tsioliaridou, A., Ioannidis, S., Kantartzis, N., Pitsillides, A.: A deployable routing system for nanonetworks. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. 2016, 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tsioliaridou, A., Liaskos, C., Ioannidis, S., Pitsillides, A.: Corona: a coordinate and routing system for nanonetworks. In Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication, ser. NANOCOM’ 15. New York, NY, USA, pp. 18:1–18:6. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu, H., Ng, B., Seah, W.K.G.: Forwarding schemes for em-based wireless nanosensor networks in the terahertz band. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication, pp. 17:1–17:6 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhou, R., Li, Z., Wu, C., Williamson, C.: Buddy routing: a routing paradigm for nanonets based on physical layer network coding. In: 21st International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN) 2012, pp. 1–7 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsioliaridou, A., et al.: CORONA: a coordinate and Routing system for nanonetworks. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liaskos, C., Tsioliaridou, A.: A promise of realizable, ultra-scalable communications at nano-scale: a multi-modal nano-machine architecture. IEEE Trans. Comput. 64(5), 1282–1295 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Samet, H.: K-nearest neighbor finding using MaxNearestDist. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30(2), 243–252 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Al-Turjman, F.: Cognitive caching for the future fog networking. Elsevier Pervasive Mobile Comput. (2017).
  22. 22.
    Agoulmine, N., Kim, K., Kim, S., Rim, T., Lee, J.-S., Meyyappan, M.: Enabling communication and cooperation in bio-nanosensor networks: toward innovative healthcare solutions. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 19(5), 42–51 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Singh, G., Al-Turjman, F.: A data delivery framework for cognitive information-centric sensor networks in smart outdoor monitoring. Elsevier Comput. Commun. J. 74(1), 38–51 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Jornet, J.M.: The internet of nano-things. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 17(6), pp. 58–63 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lewis, F.: Wireless sensor networks. In: Smart Environments: Technology, Protocols, and Applications, Ch. 2, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jornet, J.M., Akyildiz, I.F.: Channel modeling and capacity analysis for electromagnetic wireless nanonetworks in the terahertz band. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 10(10), 3211–3221 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu, H., Bryan, N., Seah, W.K.G.: Forwarding schemes for EM-based wireless nanosensor networks in the terahertz band. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang, P., Jornet, J.M., Malik, M.A., Akkari, N., Akyildiz, I.F. (2013). Energy and spectrum-aware MAC protocol for perpetual wireless nanosensor networks in the terahertz band. Ad Hoc Netw. JGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singh, G., Al-Turjman, F.: Learning data delivery paths in qoi-aware information-centric sensor networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 3(4), 572–580 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Texas Instruments CC2530.
  31. 31.
    Al-Turjman, F.: Cognition in information-centric sensor networks for IoT applications: an overview. Springer Ann. Telecommun. J. 1–16 (2016).
  32. 32.
    Al-Turjman, F., Hassanein, H., Ibnkahla, M.: Quantifying connectivity in wireless sensor networks with grid-based deployments. Elsevier J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 36(1), 368–377 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityMersin 10Turkey

Personalised recommendations