A general Cyber–Physical framework for academic library

Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

Recent advances in information technology have paved a way of developing a holistic framework for academic librarianship. Within this framework, all related perspectives should be closely monitored and synchronized between readers and information systems of academic libraries. By utilizing advanced information analysis techniques, libraries are able to serve the readers more efficiently, collaboratively and smartly. Such trend is transforming the academic library to the next generation. In this paper, we propose service-oriented five-layer architecture as a reference for constructing the next generation library. First, we introduce our general structure of Cyber–Physical Library, which constituted by perceptual layer, physical layer, cyber layer, cognition layer and management layer. Second, we present two study cases for demonstrating how the proposed framework works in practical application. It is hoped that the propose framework will provide a reference guideline for future generation of Library 3.0.

Keywords

Academic library Cyber–Physical framework Service-oriented Five-layer architecture 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the Social Science Research Funding for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (No. 2017SJB0172), Jiangsu Province Applied Social Science Research Project (No. 16SYB-100).

References

  1. 1.
    Merriam-Webster: Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, Springfield (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fowler, F.G.: In: Allen, R.E. (ed.) The Pocket Oxford Dictionary of Current English. Oxford University Press, Auckland (1984)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holmberg, K., Huvila, I., Kronqvist-Berg, M., Widen-Wulff, G.: What is Library 2.0? J. Doc. 65(4), 668–681 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maness, J.M.: Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries. Webology 3(2), 50–53 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller, P.: Web 2.0: building the new library. Ariadne 45 (2005). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/
  6. 6.
    Bingsi, F., Xiaojing, H.: Library 2.0: building the new library services. J. Acad. Libr. 1, 2–5 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu, C., Ouyang, F., Chu, H.: The academic library meets Web 2.0: applications and implications. J. Acad. Librariansh. 35(4), 324–331 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harinarayana, N.S., Vasantha Raju, N.: Web 2.0 features in university library web sites. Electron. Libr. 28(1), 69–88 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Casey, M.E., Savastinuk, L.C.: Service for the next generation library. Libr. J. 131(1), 40–42 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curran, K., Murray, M., Stephen Norrby, D., Christian, M.: Involving the user through Library 2.0. N. Rev. Inf. Netw. 12(1–2), 47–59 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gosling, M., Harper, G., McLean, M.: Public Library 2.0: some Australian experiences. Electron. Libr. 27(5), 846–855 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mahmood, K., Richardson Jr., J.V.: Adoption of Web 2.0 in US academic libraries: a survey of ARL library websites. Program 45(4), 365–375 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carlsson, H.: Working with Facebook in public libraries: a backstage glimpse into the Library 2.0 rhetoric. Libri 62(3), 199–210 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cao, D.: Chinese Library 2.0: status and development. Chin. Librariansh. 27 (2009). http://www.whiteclouds.com/iclc/cliej/cl27cao.htm
  15. 15.
    Xiao, N.: Web 2.0 as catalyst: virtually reaching out to users and connecting them to library resources and services. Issues Sci. Technol. Librariansh. doi: 10.5062/F40C4SPW (2008)
  16. 16.
    Heradio, R., Cabrerizo, F.J., Fernandez-Amors, D., Herrera, M., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A fuzzy linguistic model to evaluate the quality of Library 2.0 functionalities. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33(4), 642–654 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Corrado, E.M.: Privacy and Library 2.0: How do they conflict? In: Sailing into the Future: Charting Our Destiny: Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries. Association of College and Research Libraries (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khaitan, S.K., McCalley, J.D.: Design techniques and applications of cyber-physical systems: a survey. IEEE Syst. J. 9(2), 350–365 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee, E.A., Seshia, S.A.: Introduction to Embedded Systems: A Cyber-Physical Systems Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baheti, R., Gill, H.: Cyber-physical systems. Impact Control Technol. 12, 161–166 (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.A.: A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 3, 18–23 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., Kumar, V.: Anomaly detection: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 41(3), 15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hodge, V., Austin, J.: A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artif. Intell. Rev. 22(2), 85–126 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berkhin, P.: A survey of clustering data mining techniques. Group. Multidimens. Data 43(1), 25–71 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kopetz, H.: Internet of things. In: Real-Time Systems, pp. 307–323. Springer, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436–444 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University LibraryNanjing University of Information Science & TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations