Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 299–310 | Cite as

Developing advanced fingerprint attacks on challenge-based collaborative intrusion detection networks

  • Wenjuan Li
  • Weizhi MengEmail author
  • Lam-For Kwok
  • Horace H. S. Ip
Article

Abstract

Traditionally, an isolated intrusion detection system (IDS) is vulnerable to various types of attacks. In order to enhance IDS performance, collaborative intrusion detection networks (CIDNs) are developed through enabling a set of IDS nodes to communicate with each other. Due to the distributed network architecture, insider attacks are one of the major threats. In the literature, challenge-based trust mechanisms have been built to identify malicious nodes by evaluating the satisfaction levels between challenges and responses. However, such mechanisms rely on two major assumptions, which may result in a weak threat model. In this case, CIDNs may be still vulnerable to advanced insider attacks in real-world deployment. In this paper, we propose a novel collusion attack, called passive message fingerprint attack (PMFA), which can collect messages and identify normal requests in a passive way. In the evaluation, we explore the attack performance under both simulated and real network environments. Experimental results demonstrate that our attack can help malicious nodes send malicious responses to normal requests, while maintaining their trust values.

Keywords

Intrusion detection system Collaborative network Insider threats Collusion attacks Challenge-based trust mechanism 

References

  1. 1.
    Li, W., Meng, W., Kwok, L.F., Ip, H.H.S.: PMFA: toward passive message fingerprint attacks on challenge-based collaborative intrusion detection networks. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Network and System Security (NSS 2016), pp. 433–449 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chun, B., Lee, J., Weatherspoon, H., Chun, B.N.: Netbait: a distributed worm detection service. Technical Report IRB-TR-03-033, Intel Research Berkeley (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Douceur, J.: The sybil attack. In: Druschel, P., Kaashoek, M.F., Rowstron, A. (eds.) IPTPS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2429. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duma, C., Karresand, M., Shahmehri, N., Caronni, G.: A trust-aware, P2P-based overlay for intrusion detection. In: DEXA Workshop, pp. 692–697 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedberg, I., Skopik, F., Settanni, G., Fiedler, R.: Combating advanced persistent threats: from network event correlation to incident detection. Comput. Secur. 48, 35–57 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fung, C.J., Baysal, O., Zhang, J., Aib, I., Boutaba, R.: Trust management for host-based collaborative intrusion detection. In: De Turck, F., Kellerer, W. Kormentzas, G. (eds.) DSOM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5273, pp. 109–122 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fung, C.J., Zhang. J., Aib, I., Boutaba, R.: Robust and scalable trust management for collaborative intrusion detection. In: Proceedings of the 11th IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM), pp. 33–40 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fung, C.J., Zhu, Q., Boutaba, R., Basar, T.: Bayesian decision aggregation in collaborative intrusion detection networks. In: NOMS, pp. 349–356 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fung, C.J., Boutaba, R.: Design and management of collaborative intrusion detection networks. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM), pp. 955–961 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gong, F.: Next Generation Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS). McAfee Network Security Technologies Group (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gou, Z., Ahmadon, M.A.B., Yamaguchi, S., Gupta, B.B.: A Petri Net-based Framework of Intrusion Detection Systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Global Conference on Consumer Electronics, pp. 579–583 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huebsch, R., Chun, B.N., Hellerstein, J.M., Loo, B.T., Maniatis, P., Roscoe, T., Shenker, S., Stoica, I., Yumerefendi, A.R.: The architecture of PIER: an internet-scale query processor. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR), pp. 28–43 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, Z., Chen, Y., Beach, A.: Towards scalable and robust distributed intrusion alert fusion with good load balancing. In: Proceedings of the 2006 SIGCOMM Workshop on Large-Scale Attack Defense (LSAD), pp. 115–122 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, W., Meng, Y., Kwok, L.-F.: Enhancing trust evaluation using intrusion sensitivity in collaborative intrusion detection networks: feasibility and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS), pp. 518–522. IEEE, Piscataway (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, W., Meng, Y., Kwok, L.-F.: Design of intrusion sensitivity-based trust management model for collaborative intrusion detection networks. In: Proceedings of the 8th IFIP WG 11.11 International Conference on Trust Management (IFIPTM), pp. 61–76. Springer, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, W., Meng, W.: Enhancing collaborative intrusion detection networks using intrusion sensitivity in detecting pollution attacks. Inform. Comput. Secur. 24(3), 265–276 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meng, Y., Kwok, L.F.: Enhancing false alarm reduction using voted ensemble selection in intrusion detection. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 6(4), 626–638 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meng, Y., Li, W., Kwok, L.F.: Towards adaptive character frequency-based exclusive signature matching scheme and its applications in distributed intrusion detection. Comput. Netw. 57(17), 3630–3640 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meng, W., Li, W., Kwok, L.-F.: An evaluation of single character frequency-based exclusive signature matching in distinct IDS environments. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Security (ISC), pp. 465–476 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meng, W., Li, W., Kwok, L.F.: EFM: enhancing the performance of signature-based network intrusion detection systems using enhanced filter mechanism. Comput. Secur. 43, 189–204 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meng, W., Li, W., Kwok, L.F.: Design of intelligent KNN-based alarm filter using knowledge-based alert verification in intrusion detection. Secur. Commun. Netw. 8(18), 3883–3895 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meng, W., Li, W., Xiang, Y., Choo, K.K.R.: A bayesian inference-based detection mechanism to defend medical smartphone networks against insider attacks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 78, 162–169 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meng, W., Li, W., Kwok, L.-F.: Towards effective trust-based packet filtering in collaborative network environments. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 14(1), 233–245 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mishra, A., Gupta, B.B., Joshi, R.C.: A comparative study of distributed Denial of service attacks, intrusion tolerance and mitigation techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2011 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference, pp. 286–289 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Papadopoulos, C., Lindell, R., Mehringer, J., Hussain, A., Govindan, R.: COSSACK: coordinated suppression of simultaneous attacks. In: Proceedings of the 2003 DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX), pp. 94–96 (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Porras, P.A., Neumann, P.G.: Emerald: event monitoring enabling responses to anomalous live disturbances. In: Proceedings of the 20th National Information Systems Security Conference, pp. 353–365 (1997)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scarfone, K., Mell, P.: Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS). NIST Special Publication 800-94 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Snapp, S.R., et al.: DIDS (distributed intrusion detection system)—motivation, architecture, and an early prototype. In: Proceedings of the 14th National Computer Security Conference, pp. 167–176 (1991)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Snort: An an open source network intrusion prevention and detection system (IDS/IPS). Homepage. http://www.snort.org/
  30. 30.
    Tuan, T.A.: A game-theoretic analysis of trust management in P2P systems. In: Proceedings of ICCE, pp. 130–134 (2006)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu, Y.-S., Foo, B., Mei, Y., Bagchi, S.: Collaborative intrusion detection system (CIDS): a framework for accurate and efficient IDS. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC), pp. 234–244 (2003)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yegneswaran, V., Barford, P., Jha, S.: Global intrusion detection in the DOMINO overlay system. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), pp. 1–17 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenjuan Li
    • 1
  • Weizhi Meng
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lam-For Kwok
    • 1
  • Horace H. S. Ip
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer ScienceTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations