Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 1517–1525 | Cite as

Two-stage plant species recognition by local mean clustering and Weighted sparse representation classification

  • Shanwen Zhang
  • Harry WangEmail author
  • Wenzhun Huang
Article

Abstract

Aiming at the difficult problem of plant leaf recognition on the large-scale database, a two-stage local similarity based classification learning (LSCL) method is proposed by combining local mean-based clustering (LMC) method and local sparse representation based classification (SRC) (LWSRC). In the first stage, LMC is applied to coarsely classifying the test sample. k nearest neighbors of the test sample, as a neighbor subset, is selected from each training class, then the local geometric center of each class is calculated. S candidate neighbor subsets of the test sample are determined with the first S smallest distances between the test sample and each local geometric center. In the second stage, LWSRC is proposed to approximately represent the test sample through a linear weighted sum of all \(k\times S\) samples of the S candidate neighbor subsets. Experimental results on the leaf image database demonstrate that the proposed method not only has a high accuracy and low time cost, but also can be clearly interpreted.

Keywords

Local similarity-based-classification learning (LSCL) Local mean-based clustering method (LMC) Weighted sparse representation based classification (WSRC) Local WSRC (LWSRC) Two-stage LSCL 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by the China National Natural Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 61473237 and 61309008. It is also supported by the Shaanxi Natural Science Foundation Research Project under Grant No. 2014JM2-6096.The authors would like to thank all the editors and anonymous reviewers for their constructive advices.

References

  1. 1.
    Valentini, G.L., Lassonde, W., Khan, S.U., et al.: An overview of energy efficiency techniques in cluster computing systems. Cluster Comput. 16(1), 3–15 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Han, C.: Improved SLIC imagine segmentation algorithm based on K-means. Cluster Comput. (2017). doi: 10.1007/s10586-017-0792-9
  3. 3.
    Yang, J., Zhang, L., Yang, J.Y., Zhang, D.: From classifiers to discriminators: a nearest neighbor rule induced discriminant analysis. Pattern Recognit. 44, 1387–1402 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kang, S.H., Kim, K.J.: A feature selection approach to find optimal feature subsets for the network intrusion detection system. Cluster Comput. 19(1), 325–333 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jang, S.W., Jung, M.: Robust detection of mosaic regions in visual image data. Cluster Comput. 19(4), 2285–2293 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao, L., Jiang, L., Dong, X.: Supervised feature selection method via potential value estimation. Cluster Comput. 19(4), 2039–2049 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martinez, A.M., Kak, A.C.: PCA versus LDA. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 23, 228–233 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright, J., Yang, A.Y., Ganesh, A., et al.: Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31, 210–227 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wright, J., Ma, Y., Mairal, J., et al.: Sparse representation for computer vision and pattern recognition. Proc. IEEE 98, 1031–1044 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deng, W., Hu, J., Guo, J.: Extended SRC: under sampled face recognition via intraclass variant dictionary. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34(9), 1864–1870 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, J., Zhang, L., Xu, Y., et al.: Beyond sparsity: the role of L1-optimizerin pattern classification. Pattern Recognit. 45(3), 1104–1118 (2012)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo, S., Ruan, Q., Miao, Z.: Similarity weighted sparse representation for classification. In: International conference on pattern recognition (ICPR), pp. 1241–1244 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lu, C.Y., Min, H., Gui, J., et al.: Face recognition via weighted sparse representation. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 24(2), 111–116 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, C., Guo, J., Zhang, H.G.: Local sparse representation based classification. In: International conference on pattern recognition, pp. 649-653 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, S.W., Lei, Y.K., Wu, Y.H.: Semi-supervised locally discriminant projection for classification and recognition. Knowl.-Based Syst. 24(2), 341–346 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, S.W., Lei, Y.K.: Modified locally linear discriminant embedding for plant leaf recognition. Neurocomputing 74(14–15), 2284–2290 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao, C., Chan, S.F., Cham, W.K., et al.: Plant identification using leaf shapes—a pattern counting approach. Pattern Recognit. 48(10), 3203–3215 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Munisami, Trishen, Ramsurn, Mahess, Kishnah, Somveer, et al.: Plant leaf recognition using shape features and colour histogram with K-nearest neighbour classifiers. Proc. Comput. Sci. 58, 740–747 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ahmed, N., UG, Khan, Asif, S.: An automatic leaf based plant identification system. Sci.Int. 28(1), 427–430 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, Shanwen, Lei, YingKe, Zhang, Chuanlei, et al.: Semi-supervised orthogonal discriminant projection for plant leaf classification. Pattern Anal. Appl. 19(4), 953–961 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Munisami, T., Ramsurn, M., Kishnah, S., et al.: Plant leaf recognition using shape features and colour histogram with K-nearest neighbour classifiers. Proc. Comput. Sci. 58, 740–747 (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chaki, J., Parekh, R., Bhattacharya, S.: Plant leaf recognition using texture and shape features with neural classifiers. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 58, 61–68 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hsiao, J.K., Kang, L.W., Chang, C.L., et al.: Learning sparse representation for leaf image recognition. In: IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics. IEEE, pp. 209–210 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jin, Taisong, Hou, Xueliang, Li, Pifan, et al.: A novel method of automatic plant species identification using sparse representation of leaf tooth features. PLoS ONE 10(10), 1–20 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    He, R., Hu, B.G., Zheng, W.S., et al.: Two-stage sparse representation for robust recognition on large-scale database. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-10), pp. 475–480 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yong, Xu, Zhu, Qi, Fan, Zizhu, et al.: Using the idea of the sparse representation to perform coarse-to-fine face recognition. Inf. Sci. 238, 138–148 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Elhamifar, E., Vidal, R.: Sparse subspace clustering: algorithm, theory, and applications. IEEE T Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35(11), 2765–2781 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim, S.J., Koh, K., Lustig, M., et al.: A method for large-scale \(l_{1}\)-regularized least squares. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 1(4), 606–617 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Canny, J.A.: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 8(6), 679–698 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information EngineeringXijing UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.GoPerception LaboratoryIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations