Cluster Computing

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 803–815 | Cite as

Cloud-based rehabilitation and recovery prediction system for stroke patients

  • Mohamad Hoda
  • Yehya Hoda
  • Abbass Hage
  • Abdulhameed Alelaiwi
  • Abdulmotaleb El Saddik


Motivation is one of the main reasons that a group of patients with the same pathology respond differently to a rehabilitation program. It is well-known that besides family and close friends, showing the real progress to the patients is another significant motivating factor for them. This can increase patient’s self-satisfaction, engagement, and enjoyment. In this study, we have designed and implemented a cloud-based rehabilitation system that helps stroke patients enhancing their motor functions. Forty five healthy persons (18 females and 27 males) and three stroke patients have volunteered to participate in our experiment. The derived data from the healthy subjects is served as motion normative data that can be used for accurate assessment of hand function. We have applied a well-known optical alignment technique, dynamic time warping, to compare the time series kinematics patterns of stroke patients with those of healthy subjects. The prototype of this system is tested on three patients for ten weeks. Results show that patients have improved moving and controlling their upper limbs over the course of training. Such conclusion is also confirmed clinically; the patients have performed the action research arm test under a direct supervision of an orthopedic doctor and a professional physiotherapist. Moreover, recovery predictions with ARIMA models of stroke patients have given encouraging results with percentage of error less than 2.0 % for patient one and patient three, and 10.35 % for patient two.


Cloud systems Recovery prediction Stroke rehabilitation Kinect Model matching DTW ARIMA 



The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for funding this work through the International research group Program No IRG14-30.


  1. 1.
    Go, A.S., Mozaffarian, D., Roger, V.L., Benjamin, E.J., Berry, J.D., Borden, W.B., Bravata, D.M., Dai, S.: Heart disease and stroke statistics. Technical report, American Heart Association (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Faria-Fortini, I., Michaelsen, S.M., Cassiano, J.G., Teixeira-Salmela, L.G.: Upper extremity function in stroke subjects: relationships between the international classification of functioning, disability and health domains. J. Hand Therapy 24, 256–264 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sveistrup, H.: Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality: review. J. Nueroeng. Rehabil. 1, 10–18 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karime, A., Eid, M., Gueaieb, W., El Saddik, A.: Determining wrist reference kinematics using a sensory-mounted stress ball. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE), pp. 109–114 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jaworski, C., Krause, M., Brown, J.: Rehabilitation of the wrist and hand following sports injury. Clin. Sports Med. 29, 16–18 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jung, E.Y., Kim, J., Chung, K.Y., Park, D.: Mobile healthcare application with emr interoperability for diabetes patients. Clust. Comput. 17(3), 871–880 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alamri, A., Cha, J., El Saddik, A.: Ar-rehab: an augmented reality framework for poststroke-patient rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 59, 2554–2563 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jung, H., Yang, J., Woo, J.I., Lee, B.M., Ouyang, J., Chung, K., Lee, Y.: Evolutionary rule decision using similarity based associative chronic disease patients. Clust. Comput. 18(1), 279–291 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, J.K., Lee, J.S., Park, D.K., Lim, Y.S., Lee, Y.H., Jung, E.Y.: Adaptive mining prediction model for content recommendation to coronary heart disease patients. Clust. Comput. 17(3), 881–891 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoda, M., Dong, H., El Saddik, A.: Recovery prediction in the framework of cloud-based rehabilitation exergame. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Viau, A., Feldman, A.G., McFadyen, B.J., Levin, M.F.: Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J. Nueroeng. Rehabil. 1, 1–7 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keshner, E.A.: Virtual reality and physical rehabilitation: a new toy or a new research and rehabilitation tool? J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 1(8), 1–2 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Turolla, A., Dam, M., Ventura, L., Tonin, P., Agostini, M., Zucconi, C., Kiper, P., Cagnin, A., Piron, L.: Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of the upper limb motor function after stroke: a prospective controlled trial. J. Nueroeng. Rehabil. 10(85), 1–9 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Webster, D., Celik, O.: Systematic review of kinect applications in elderly care and stroke rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11, 1–24 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alamri, A., Hassan, M.M., Hossain, M.A., Al-Qurishi, M., Aldukhayyi, Y., Hossain, M.S.: Evaluating the impact of a cloud-based serious game on obese people. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 468–475 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hossain, M.S., Muhammad, G.: Cloud-based collaborative media service framework for healthcare. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2014, 11 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tanaka, K., Parker, J., Baradoy, G., Sheehan, D., Holash, J.R., Katz, L.: A comparison of exergaming interfaces for use in rehabilitation programs and research. Loading.. 6(9), 69–81 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pang, M.Y., Harris, J.E., Eng, J.J.: A community-based upper-extremity group exercise program improves motor function and performance of functional activities in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87, 1–9 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nagasaki, H.: Asymmetric velocity and acceleration profiles of human arm movements. Exp. Brain Res. 74, 319–326 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim, H., Miller, L., Fedulow, I., Simkins, M., Abrams, G.M., Byl, N., Rosen, J.: Kinematic data analysis for post stroke patients following bilateral versus unilateral rehabilitation with an upper limb wearable robotic system. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 21(2), 153–164 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jebsen, R.H., Taylor, R.B., Trotter, M.J., Howard, L.A.: An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 50, 311–319 (1969)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lyle, R.C.: A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 4, 483–492 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hardin, M.: Assessment of hand function and fine motor coordination in the geriatric population. Top. Geriatr. Rehabil. 18(2), 18–27 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morasso, P.: Spatial control of arm movements. Exp. Brain Res. 42, 223–227 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lang, C.E., Bland, M.D., Bailey, R.R., Schaefer, S.Y., Birkenmeier, R.L.: Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Therapy 26(2), 104–114 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Uswatte, G., Giuliani, C., Winstein, C., Zeringue, A., Hobbs, L., Wolf, S.L.: Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87, 1340–1345 (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Flash, T., Hogan, N.: The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J. Neurosci. 5(7), 1688–1703 (1985)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tormene, P., Giorgino, T., Quaglini, S., Stefanelli, M.: Matching incomplete time series with dynamic time warping: an algorithm and an application to post-stroke rehabiltation. Artif. Intell. Med. 45, 11–34 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dong, H.W., Ugalde, I., Figueroa, N., El Saddik, A.: Towards whole body fatigue assessment of human movement: a fatigue-tracking system based on combined semg and accelerometer signals. Sensors 14, 2052–2070 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cirstea, M.C., Levin, M.F.: Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 123(5), 940–953 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jack, D., Boian, R., Merians, A.S., Tremaine, M., Burdea, G.C., Adamovich, S.V., Recce, M., Poizner, H.: Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 9, 308–318 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Care Poly ClinicDohaQatar
  3. 3.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  4. 4.King Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations