Advertisement

Cluster Computing

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 829–844 | Cite as

FUGE: A joint meta-heuristic approach to cloud job scheduling algorithm using fuzzy theory and a genetic method

  • Mohammad Shojafar
  • Saeed Javanmardi
  • Saeid Abolfazli
  • Nicola Cordeschi
Article

Abstract

Job scheduling is one of the most important research problems in distributed systems, particularly cloud environments/computing. The dynamic and heterogeneous nature of resources in such distributed systems makes optimum job scheduling a non-trivial task. Maximal resource utilization in cloud computing demands/necessitates an algorithm that allocates resources to jobs with optimal execution time and cost. The critical issue for job scheduling is assigning jobs to the most suitable resources, considering user preferences and requirements. In this paper, we present a hybrid approach called FUGE that is based on fuzzy theory and a genetic algorithm (GA) that aims to perform optimal load balancing considering execution time and cost. We modify the standard genetic algorithm (SGA) and use fuzzy theory to devise a fuzzy-based steady-state GA in order to improve SGA performance in term of makespan. In details, the FUGE algorithm assigns jobs to resources by considering virtual machine (VM) processing speed, VM memory, VM bandwidth, and the job lengths. We mathematically prove our optimization problem which is convex with well-known analytical conditions (specifically, Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions). We compare the performance of our approach to several other cloud scheduling models. The results of the experiments show the efficiency of the FUGE approach in terms of execution time, execution cost, and average degree of imbalance.

Keywords

Cloud computing Mathematical optimization Job scheduling Genetic algorithm (GA) Fuzzy theory Makespan 

References

  1. 1.
    Mezmaz, M., et al.: A parallel bi-objective hybrid metaheuristic for energy-aware scheduling for cloud computing systems. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 71(11), 1497–1508 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armbrust, M., et al.: A view of cloud computing. Commun ACM 53(4), 50–58 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dikaiakos, M.D., Pallis, G., Katsaros, D., Mehra, P., Vakali, A.: Cloud computing: distributed Internet computing for IT and scientific research. IEEE Internet Comput. 13(5), 10–13 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rimal, B. P., Eunmi, C., Lumb, I. A.: Taxonomy and Survey of Cloud Computing Systems. In: Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC, Seoul, 2009, pp. 44–51.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, Q., Yike, G.: Optimization of resource scheduling in cloud computing. IEEE SYNASC, Timisoara (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cordeschi, N., Shojafar, M., Baccarelli, E.: Energy-saving self-configuring networked data centers. Computer Networks 57(17), 3479–3491 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg, D.E., Holland, J.H.: Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Mach. Learn. 3(2–3), 95–99 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vas, P.: Artificial-intelligence-based electrical machines and drives: application of fuzzy, neural, fuzzy-neural, and genetic-algorithm-based techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Takagi, M. Sugeno, Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC- 15(1)1 116–132 (1985).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Javanmardi, S., Shojafar, M., Amendola, D., Cordeschi, N., Liu, H., Abraham, A.: Hybrid job scheduling algorithm for cloud computing environment. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 303, 43–52 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Javanmardi, S., Shojafar, M., Shariatmadari, Sh, Abawajy, J.H., Singhal, M.: PGSW-OS: a novel approach for resource management in a semantic web operating system based on a P2P grid architecture. The Journal of Supercomputing 69(2), 955–975 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Randles, M., Lamb, D., Taleb-Bendiab, A.: A comparative study into distributed load balancing algorithms for cloud computing. In: IEEE Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), pp. 551–556. WA, Perth (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    X. Baowen, G. Yu, Ch. Zhenqiang, K. R. P. H. Leung, Parallel genetic algorithms with schema migration. In: Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), pp. 879–884 (2002).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhongni, Z., Wang, R., Hai, Z., Xuejie, Z.: An approach for cloud resource scheduling based on Parallel Genetic Algorithm. In: ICCRD IEEE Shanghai, China, 2, 444–447 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu, J., Jianhua, G., Guofei, S., Tianhai, Z.: A Scheduling Strategy on Load Balancing of Virtual Machine Resources in Cloud Computing Environment. In: IEEE PAAP. pp. 89–96. Dalian, China (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh, R.M., Sendhil Kumar, K.S., Jaisankar, N.: Comparison of probabilistic optimization algorithms for resource scheduling in cloud computing environment. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 5(2), 1419–1427 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mamdani, E.H.: Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineer, IET Digital Library 121(12), 1585–1588 (1974)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vignesh, V., Sendhil, K.S., Jaisankar, N.: Resource Management and Scheduling in Cloud Environment. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 3(6), 1–6 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beloglazov, A., Buyya, R.: Energy Efficient Resource Management in Virtualized Cloud Data Centers. In: 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 826–831 (2010).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen, S., Wu, J., Lu, Z.: A Cloud Computing Resource Scheduling Policy Based on Genetic Algorithm with Multiple Fitness. In: IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, Chengdu, pp. 177–184 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sh. Sawant, A Genetic Algorithm Scheduling Approach for Virtual Machine Resources in a Cloud Computing Environment, Msc Thesis, (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaur, S., Verma, A.: An efficient approach to genetic algorithm for job scheduling in cloud computing environment. Int. J. Info. Technol. Comput. Sci. 4(10), 74–79 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumar, V.V., Dinesh, K.: Job scheduling using fuzzy neural network algorithm in cloud environment. Int. J. Man Mach. Interface 2(1), 1–6 (2012)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Calheiros, R.N., Ranjan, R., Beloglazov, A., De Rose, C.A.F., Buyya, R.: CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Software: Pract. Experience 41(1), 23–50 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abirami, S.P., Ramanathan, Sh: Linear scheduling strategy for resource allocation in cloud environment. International Journal on Cloud Computing: Services and Architecture (IJCCSA) 2(1), 9–17 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Foster, I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., Lu, S.: Cloud Computing and Grid Computing 360-Degree Compared, Grid Computing Environments Workshop (GCE ’08), pp. 1–10. Austin, TX, (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beloglazov, A., Buyya, R.: Managing Overloaded Hosts for Dynamic Consolidation of Virtual Machines in Cloud Data Centers under Quality of Service Constraints. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 24(7), 1366–1379 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Buyya, R., Broberg, J., Goscinski, A.M.: Cloud computing: principles and paradigms. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Joyent official Site. http://www.joyent.com/. Accessed 2014
  30. 30.
    Microsoft’s Windows Azure official Site. https://azure.microsoft.com/. Accessed 2014
  31. 31.
    Rackspace official Site. www.rackspace.com/. Accessed 2014
  32. 32.
    Dadgar, M., Hosseini, M.V., Merati, A.A., Sarkheyli, A.: Comparison of Mamdani and Sugeno fuzzy inference system in prediction of residual frieze effect of frieze carpet yarns. Tekstilna Industrija 61(2), 16–25 (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Javanmardi, S., Shariatmadari, Sh, Mosleh, M.: A novel decentralized fuzzy based approach for grid resource discovery. Int. J. Innov. Comput. 3(1), 23–32 (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Javanmardi, S., Shojafar, M., Shariatmadari, Sh, Ahrabi, S.S.: FR TRUST: a fuzzy reputation based model for Trust management in semantic P2P grids. Int. J. Grid Utility Comput. 6(1), 57–66 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Medhat, A.T., Ashraf, E.S., Arabi, E.K., Fawzy, A.T.: Hybrid job scheduling algorithm for cloud computing environment. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 303, 43-52 (2014), Atlantis Press, pp. 169–172 (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Du, D.-Z., Ko, K.-I.: Theory of computational complexity. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ephzibah, E.P.: Time complexity analysis of genetic-fuzzy system for disease diagnosis, Advanced Computing, 2(4), 23–31 (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lotfi Zadeh, A.: A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computers Math. Appl. 9(1), 149–184 (1983)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Shojafar
    • 1
  • Saeed Javanmardi
    • 2
  • Saeid Abolfazli
    • 3
  • Nicola Cordeschi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Engineering Electronics and Telecommunications (DIET)University Sapienza of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Research and Education centerNikan network CompanyShirazIran
  3. 3.Center for Mobile Cloud ComputingUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations