Cluster Computing

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 169–189 | Cite as

Multi-objective workflow scheduling in Amazon EC2

  • Juan J. Durillo
  • Radu Prodan


Nowadays, scientists and companies are confronted with multiple competing goals such as makespan in high-performance computing and economic cost in Clouds that have to be simultaneously optimised. Multi-objective scheduling of scientific applications in these systems is therefore receiving increasing research attention. Most existing approaches typically aggregate all objectives in a single function, defined a-priori without any knowledge about the problem being solved, which negatively impacts the quality of the solutions. In contrast, Pareto-based approaches having as outcome a set of (nearly) optimal solutions that represent a tradeoff among the different objectives, have been scarcely studied. In this paper, we analyse MOHEFT, a Pareto-based list scheduling heuristic that provides the user with a set of tradeoff optimal solutions from which the one that better suits the user requirements can be manually selected. We demonstrate the potential of our method for multi-objective workflow scheduling on the commercial Amazon EC2 Cloud. We compare the quality of the MOHEFT tradeoff solutions with two state-of-the-art approaches using different synthetic and real-world workflows: the classical HEFT algorithm for single-objective scheduling and the SPEA2* genetic algorithm used in multi-objective optimisation problems. The results demonstrate that our approach is able to compute solutions of higher quality than SPEA2*. In addition, we show that MOHEFT is more suitable than SPEA2* for workflow scheduling in the context of commercial Clouds, since the genetic-based approach is unable of dealing with some of the constraints imposed by these systems.


Workflow scheduling Cloud Multi-objective optimisation List-based heuristics 


  1. 1.
    Alexandru, I., Ostermann, S., Yigitbasi, M., Prodan, R., Fahringer, T., Epema, D.: Performance analysis of cloud computing services for many-tasks scientific computing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 22(6), 931–945 (2010) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Assayad, I., Girault, A., Kalla, H.: A bi-criteria scheduling heuristics for distributed embedded systems under reliability and real-time constraints. In: International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN’04), Firenze, Italy. IEEE Press, New York (2003) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G., Kvasnicka, D., Luitz, J.: Wien2k: an augmented plane wave plus local orbitals program for calculating crystal properties. Tech. rep., Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, TU Vienna (2001) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blum, C., Roli, A.: Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Comput. Surv. 35(3), 268–308 (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canon, L.C., Emmanuel, E.: MO-Greedy: an extended beam-search approach for solving a multi-criteria scheduling problem on heterogeneous machines. In: International Heterogeneity in Computing (2011) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coello, C.A.C., Lamont, G.B., Van Veldhuisen, D.A.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Springer, Berlin (2007) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durillo, J., Fard, H., Prodan, R.: Moheft: a multi-objective lilst-based method for workflow scheduling. In: 4th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (2012) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Durillo, J.J., Nebro, A.J.: jMetal: a Java framework for multi-objective optimization. Adv. Eng. Softw. 42, 760–771 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fard, H., Prodan, R., Barrionuevo, J., Fahringer, T.: A multi-objective approach for workflow scheduling in heterogeneous environments. In: 12th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid), pp. 300–309 (2012). doi: 10.1109/CCGrid.2012.114 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garg, R., Singh, A.K.: Reference point based multi-objective optimization to workflow grid scheduling. Int. J. Appl. Evol. Comput. 3(1), 80–99 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garg, S.K., Buyya, R., Siegel, H.J.: Scheduling parallel applications on utility grids: time and cost trade-off management. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Australasian Conference on Computer Science (ACSC ’09), Darlinghurst, Australia, vol. 91, pp. 151–160. Australian Computer Society, Sydney (2009) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hakem, M., Butelle, F.: Reliability and scheduling on systems subject to failures. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP ’07), p. 38. IEEE Comput. Soc., Washington (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ilavarsan, E., Thambidurai, P.: Low complexity performance effective task scheduling algorithm for heterogeneous computing environments. J. Comput. Sci. 3(2), 94–103 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mezmaz, M., Melab, N., Kessaci, Y., Lee, Y., Albi, E.G.T., Zomaya, A.Y., Tuyttens, D.: A parallel bi-objective hybrid metaheuristic for energy-aware scheduling for cloud computing systems. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 71, 1497–1508 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plachetka, T.: POVRAY—persistence of vision parallel raytracer. In: Proceedings of Computer Graphics International ’98, pp. 123–129 (1998) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sakellariou, R., Zhao, H., Tsiakkouri, E., Dikaiakos, M.D.: Scheduling workflows with budget constraints. In: Gorlatch, S., Danelutto, M. (eds.) Integrated Research in Grid Computing. CoreGrid Series. Springer, Berlin (2007) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh, D., Garg, R.: A robust multi-objective optimization to workflow scheduling for dynamic grid. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ACAI ’11), pp. 183–188. ACM, New York (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh, M.P., Vouk, M.A.: Scientific Workflows: Scientific Computing Meets Transactional Workflows (1996) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Talukder, A.K.M.K.A., Kirley, M., Buyya, R.: Multiobjective differential evolution for scheduling workflow applications on global grids. Evolution 21(13), 1742–1756 (2009) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor, I.J., Deelman, E., Gannon, D.B., Shields, M.: Workflows for e-Science: Scientific Workflows for Grids. Springer, New York (2006) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Topcuoglu, H., Hariri, S., Wu, M.Y.: Performance-effective and low-complexity task scheduling for heterogeneous computing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 13(3), 260–274 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ullman, J.: Np-complete scheduling problems. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 10(3), 384–393 (1975) CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu, J., Buyya, R., Ramamohanarao, K.: Workflow scheduling algorithms for grid computing. In: Xhafa, F., Abraham, A. (eds.) Metaheuristics for Scheduling in Distributed Computing Environments, pp. 109–153. Springer, Berlin (2008) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu, J., Kirley, M., Buyya, R.: Multi-objective planning for workflow execution on grids. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing (GRID ’07), pp. 10–17. IEEE Comput. Soc., Washington (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zeng, J.t., Xia, J.w., Li, J.z., Li, M.h.: Multi-objective optimal grid workflow scheduling with qos constraints. In: Cao, B., Li, T.F., Zhang, C.Y. (eds.) Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Volume 2. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol. 62, pp. 839–847. Springer, Berlin (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: Spea2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. Tech. rep. 103, Gloriastrasse 35, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland (2001) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations