Cluster Computing

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 101–110 | Cite as

Developing a Model Driven Approach for engineering applications based on mOSAIC

Towards sharing elastic components in the Cloud
  • Vlado Stankovski
  • Dana Petcu


In many scientific and engineering areas there are emerging software services available over the Web. The reason for deploying such services in the Cloud is either to reduce the operational costs or to support the peaks in their usage profiles. The algorithms employed in such services are usually result of a long term research and technology development work, so it is beneficial to reuse those critical application parts when developing new Cloud applications. This paper investigates the possibilities to introduce a Model Driven Architecture (MDA) for the Cloud computing domain, which would support composition, customization, flexibility, maintenance and reusability of Cloud application components in the particular case of scientific and engineering applications. The underlying middleware technology of choice is the mOSAIC Platform as a Service (PaaS) solution. This choice is motivated by the fact that in mOSAIC a Cloud application consists of loosely coupled components, which are either generic and provide for key resource types needed by an application (computation, storage, communication) or custom made, e.g. based on existing legacy software. The MDA approach is illustrated through the design and operation of an application for analysis of structures under static loading. It is shown that a relatively simple design can be used to address two application bottlenecks: the varying number of users and the computational complexity of the given problem. The design reduces the necessary application development efforts and the key components can be reused for similar applications.


Model Driven Architecture Components PaaS Cloud Civil engineering 



This research is partially supported by the grant FP7-ICT-2009-5-256910 (mOSAIC), and partially by the Romanian grant PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0260 (AMICAS) in the case of the second author.


  1. 1.
    Ardagna, D., Di Nitto, E., Casale, G., Petcu, D., Mohagheghi, P., Mosser, S., Matthews, P., Gericke, A., Ballagny, C., D’Andria, F., Nechifor, C.S., Sheridan, C.: MODAClouds—a model-driven approach for the design and execution of applications on multiple clouds. In: Procs. MISE 2012, pp. 50–56 (2012). doi: 10.1109/MISE.2012.6226014 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brandtzæg, E., Parastoo, M., Mosser, S.: Towards a domain-specific language to deploy applications in the clouds. In: Procs. Cloud Computing’12, pp. 213–218 (2012) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Češarek, P., Saje, M., Zupan, D.: Kinematically exact curved and twisted strain-based beam. Int. J. Solids Struct. 49(13), 1802–1817 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, L., May, J.H.R.: Safety assessment of systems embedded with cots components using the pip technique. In: Procs. TECOS 2004, pp. 93–108 (2004) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kächele, S., Domaschka, J., Hauck, F.J.: Cosca—an easy-to-use component-based paas cloud system for common applications. In: Procs. CloudCP’11, Art 4 (2011). doi: 10.1145/1967422.1967426 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Machida, F., Andrade, E., Kim, D.S., Trivedi, K.: Candy—component-based availability modeling framework for cloud service management using sysml. In: Procs. SRDS 2011, pp. 209–218 (2011). doi: 10.1109/SRDS.2011.33 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malawski, M., Meizner, J., Bubak, M., Gepner, P.: Component approach to computational applications on clouds. Proc. Comput. Sci. 4(0), 432–441 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manias, E., Baude, F.: A component-based middleware for hybrid grid/cloud computing platforms. Concurr. Comput. 24(13), 1461–1477 (2012). doi: 10.1002/cpe.2822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martinaitis, P.N., Patten, C.J., Wendelborn, A.L.: Component-based stream processing in the cloud. In: Procs. CBHPC ’09, pp. 16:1–16:12 (2009). doi: 10.1145/1687774.1687790 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panica, S., Neagul, M., Craciun, C., Petcu, D.: Serving legacy distributed applications by a self-configuring cloud processing platform. In: Procs. IDAACS’11, pp. 139–144 (2011). doi: 10.1109/IDAACS.2011.6072727 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pei-Breivold, H., Larsson, M.: Component-based and service-oriented software engineering: key concepts and principles. In: Procs. 33rd SEAA, pp. 13–30 (2007). doi: 10.1109/EUROMICRO.2007.25 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peña-Mora, F., Vadhavkar, S., Dirisala, S.K.: Component-based software development for integrated construction management software applications. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 15(2), 173–187 (2001). doi: 10.1017/S0890060401152054 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petcu, D., Craciun, C., Neagul, M., Lazcanotegui, I., Rak, M.: Building an interoperability API for sky computing. In: Procs. HPCS 2011, pp. 405–411 (2011). doi: 10.1109/HPCSim.2011.5999853 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Petcu, D., Macariu, G., Panica, S., Craciun, C.: Portable cloud applications—from theory to practice. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.future.2012.01.009 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petcu, D., Sandru, C.: Towards component-based software engineering of cloud applications. In: Procs. WICSA/ECSA 2012, pp. 80–81 (2012). doi: 10.1145/2361999.2362013 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Petcu, D., Stankovski, V.: Towards cloud-enabled business process management based on patterns, rules and multiple models. In: Procs. ISPA 2012, pp. 454–459 (2012). doi: 10.1109/ISPA.2012.66 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rak, M., Aversa, R., Venticinque, S., Di Martino, B.: User centric service level management in mOSAIC applications. In: Procs. Euro-Par 2011 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 7156, pp. 106–115. Springer, Berlin (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-29740-3_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramachandran, M.: Component-based development for cloud computing architectures. In: Mahmood, Z., Hill, R. (eds.) Cloud Computing for Enterprise Architectures, Computer Communications and Networks, pp. 91–114 (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2236-4_5 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Skoda, P., Sperka, S., Smrz, P.: Extracting information from scientific papers in the cloud. In: Procs. CISIS 2012, pp. 775–780 (2012). doi: 10.1109/CISIS.2012.176 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stankovski, V., Južna, J., Petcu, D.: Enabling legacy engineering applications for cloud computing—experience with the mosaic api and platform. In: Procs. EIDWT 2012, pp. 281–286 (2012). doi: 10.1109/EIDWT.2012.49 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stankovski, V., Swain, M., Kravtsov, V., Niessen, T., Wegener, D., Kindermann, J., Dubitzky, W.: Grid-enabling data mining applications with datamininggrid—an architectural perspective. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 24(4), 259–279 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.future.2007.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wallis, M., Henskens, F., Hannaford, M.: Expanding the cloud—a component-based architecture to application deployment on the Internet. In: Procs. CCGrid 2010, pp. 569–570 (2010). doi: 10.1109/CCGRID.2010.14 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zheng, Z., Zhang, Y., Lyu, M.: Cloudrank—a qos-driven component ranking framework for cloud computing. In: Procs. SRDS 2010, pp. 184–193 (2010). doi: 10.1109/SRDS.2010.29 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Institute e-Austria Timişoara and West University of TimişoaraTimişoaraRomania

Personalised recommendations