Cluster Computing

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 311–322 | Cite as

Grid user requirements—2004: a perspective from the trenches

Original Paper
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Pervasive Grid adoption is predicated on the availability of widely deployed usable software and a user community willing to use it. Currently, widespread adoption of Grids, even within technically sophisticated communities, is limited, and determining and eliminating these barriers to adoption are essential in order for Grids to becoming widely capitalized. Through a series of face-to-face interviews conducted during the summer of 2004, we have identified issues relating to job submission, file transfer, usability, and systems management that must be resolved in order to improve the usability of Grid infrastructures. The background to these issues and some possible solutions are described in this paper.

Keywords

Grid functionality Security Tools User requirements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Open Middleware Infrastructure Institute, http://www.omii.ac.uk
  2. 2.
    The Globus Alliance, http://www.globus.org
  3. 3.
    UK Workshop on Grid Security Practice, Oxford, July 8–9, 2004, http://e-science.ox.ac.uk/events/security-workshop/
  4. 4.
    Service Grids: Current Activity & Middleware Requirements, NeSC Edinburgh, UK, July 22–23, 2004, http://www.nesc.ac.uk/action/esi/contribution.cfm?Title=415
  5. 5.
    Networks for Non-Networkers Workshop, University College London, UK, July 13–14, 2004, http://grid.ucl.ac.uk/NFNN.html
  6. 6.
    Edinburgh e-Science Training, Outreach, and Education, http://www.nesc.ac.uk/training/
  7. 7.
    EGEE: Enabling Grids for e-Science, http://www.eu-egee.org/
  8. 8.
    Training Events for EGEE, http://www.egee.nesc.ac.uk/schedreg/
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    UK National Grid Service, http://www.grid-support.ac.uk/
  11. 11.
    NCeSS: The National Centre for eSocial Science, http://www.ncess.ac.uk/
  12. 12.
    AHESSC: The Arts and Humanities e-Science Support Centre, http://www.ahessc.ac.uk/
  13. 13.
    GT Release Manuals Project, http://dev.globus.org/wiki/GT_Release_Manuals
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Surridge, M.: Rough Guide to Grid Security, 2002, http://www.nesc.ac.uk/esi/events/121/RoughGuidetoGridSecurityV1_1.pdf
  16. 16.
    Welch, V.: Globus Toolkit Firewall Requirements, version 5, July 2003, http://www.globus.org/security/firewalls/Globus%20Firewall%20Requirements-5.pdf
  17. 17.
    Hillier, J.: The Use of Firewalls in the UK e-Science Grid: ETF Level 2 and beyond, 2002, http://e-science.ox.ac.uk/events/firewall-workshop/FirewallIdeas.pdf
  18. 18.
    Jeffreys, P., Boyd, D.: UK Grid Firewall Workshop Report, November 2002, http://www.nesc.ac.uk/talks/121/GridCSfirewallworkshopnov5.pdf
  19. 19.
    Chhatpar, A.: Managing a grid, Part 2: Security considerations, IBM DeveloperWorks, 24 Oct 2006, http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/grid/library/gr-manage2/
  20. 20.
    Bro Intrusion Detection System, http://bro-ids.org/
  21. 21.
    Paxson, V.: Bro: a system for detecting network intruders in real-time. Comput. Netw. 31(23–24), 2435–2463 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Snort: The De Facto Standard for Intrusion Detection/Prevention, http://snort.org/
  23. 23.
    TripWire Intrusion Detection Software, http://www.utexas.edu/its/sds/products/tripwire.html
  24. 24.
    Nadalin, A., Goodner, M., Gudgin, M., Barbir, A., Granqvist, H. (eds.): WS-Trust 1.3, OASIS Committee Draft 01, #ws-trust-1.3-spec-cd-01 September 6, 2006. Available from http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512
  25. 25.
    Nadalin, A., Kaler, C., Monzillo, R., Hallam-Baker, P. (eds.): Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security 1.1 (WS-Security 2004), OASIS Standard Specification, 1 #wss-v1.1-spec-os-SOAPMessageSecurity, February 2006. Available from http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/v1.1/
  26. 26.
    Grid Resource Allocation and Management (GRAM), http://www.globus.org/gram
  27. 27.
    The Condor Project, http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/
  28. 28.
    Cieslak, D., Thain, D., Chawla, N.: Troubleshooting distributed systems via data mining, Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC), June 2006 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Allcock, W., Bresnahan, J., Kettimuthu, R., Link, M., Dumitrescu, C., Raicu, I., Foster, I.: The Globus Striped GridFTP Framework and Server, Proceedings of Super Computing 2005 (SC05), November 2005 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Open Science Grid, http://www.opensciencegrid.org/
  32. 32.
    UKLight: The UK Facility for Supporting Optical Networking, http://www.uklight.ac.uk/
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    ESG: The Earth Systems Grid, http://www.earthsystemgrid.org/
  35. 35.
    Chervenak, A., Schopf, J.M., Pearlman, L., Su, M.-H., Bharathi, S., Cinquini, L., D’Arcy, M., Miller, N., Bernholdt, D.: Monitoring the earth system grid with MDS4. In: Proceedings of the Second International conference on eScience and Grid Computing (eScience 2006), December 2006 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Open Grid Forum, http://www.ogf.org
  37. 37.
    Simple API for Grid Applications Research Group (SAGA-RG), https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/saga-rg/
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
    GT4 Admin Guide, Chapter 3, Software Prerequisites, http://www.globus.org/toolkit/docs/4.0/admin/docbook/ch03.html
  40. 40.
    Grid Packaging Tools, http://www.gridpackagingtools.org/
  41. 41.
    The Inca Test Harness and Reporting Framework, http://inca.sdsc.edu/
  42. 42.
    Smallen, S., Olschanowsky, C., Ericson, K., Beckman, P., Schopf, J.: The Inca test harness and reporting framework. In: Proceedings of SuperComputing ’04, November 2004. Also available as SDSC Technical Report #SDSC-TR-2004-3, http://www.sdsc.edu/TR/SDSC-TR-2004-3-IncaTest.pdf
  43. 43.
    GEON: The GeoSciences Network, http://www.geongrid.org/
  44. 44.
    DEISA: Distributed European Infrastructure for Supercomputing Applications, http://www.deisa.org/
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
    Fox, G., Walker, D.: e-Science Gap Analysis, UK Technical Report Series # UKeS-2003-01, June 2003 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Spencer Jr., B., Finholt, T.A., Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Beldica, C., Futrelle, J., Gullapalli, S., Hubbard, P., Liming, L., Marcusiu, D., Pearlman, L., Severance, C., Yang, G.: NEESgrid: a distributed collaboratory for advanced earthquake engineering experiment and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, August 2004 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Huff, C., Finholt, T. (eds.): Social Issues in Computing: Putting Computing in Its Place. McGraw-Hill (1994) Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Spencer, B., Butler, R., Ricker, K., Marcusiu, D., Finholt, T., Foster, I., Kesselman, C.: Cyberenvironment Project Management: Lessons Learned, September 2006. Available from http://neesgrid.ncsa.uiuc.edu/documents/CPMLL.pdf
  50. 50.
    History and Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures Workshop, Ann Arbor, September 28–October 1, http://www.si.umich.edu/InfrastructureWorkshop/
  51. 51.
    Information Infrastructures and Architectures Workshop, September 27–28, 2006, UK National eScience Centre (NeSC), http://www.nesc.ac.uk/action/esi/contribution.cfm?Title=700
  52. 52.
    Baker, R.: ATLAS Grid Requirements, December 2000, http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/computing/grid/meetings/ATLAS-Grid-Requirements.doc
  53. 53.
    Enterprise Grid Requirements Workshop, GGF18, GridWorld/GGF18, September 11–14, 2006, Washington DC, http://www.ggf.org/gf/event_schedule/index.php?id=444
  54. 54.
    Corcho, O.: Semantic Grid requirements for ontology technology, http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~ocorcho/InvitedTalks/SMI_July2006.html
  55. 55.
    Oliveira, I.C., Oliveira, J.L., Sanchez, J.P., Lopez-Alonso, V., Martin-Sanchez, F., Maojo, V., Sousa Pereira, A.: Grid requirements for the integration of biomedical information resources for health applications. Methods Inf. Medicine 44(2), 161–167 (2005) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Open Middleware Infrastructure InstituteUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.Argonne National LaboratoryArgonneUSA
  3. 3.UK National e-Science CentreEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations