Individual and combined soy isoflavones exert differential effects on metastatic cancer progression
- 2k Downloads
To investigate the effects soy isoflavones in established cancers, the role of genistein, daidzein, and combined soy isoflavones was studied on progression of subcutaneous tumors in nude mice created from green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagged-MDA-MB-435 cells. Following tumor establishment, mice were gavaged with vehicle or genistein or daidzein at 10 mg/kg body weight (BW) or a combination of genistein (10 mg/kg BW), daidzein (9 mg/kg BW), and glycitein (1 mg/kg BW) three times per week. Tumor progression was quantified by whole body fluorescence image analysis followed by microscopic image analysis of excised organs for metastases. Results show that daidzein increased while genistein decreased mammary tumor growth by 38 and 33% respectively, compared to vehicle. Daidzein increased lung and heart metastases while genistein decreased bone and liver metastases. Combined soy isoflavones did not affect primary tumor growth but increased metastasis to all organs tested, which include lung, liver, heart, kidney, and bones. Phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3-K) pathway real time PCR array analysis and western blotting of excised tumors demonstrate that genistein significantly downregulated 10/84 genes, including the Rho GTPases RHOA, RAC1, and CDC42 and their effector PAK1. Daidzein significantly upregulated 9/84 genes that regulate proliferation and protein synthesis including EIF4G1, eIF4E, and survivin protein levels. Combined soy treatment significantly increased gene and protein levels of EIF4E and decreased TIRAP gene expression. Differential regulation of Rho GTPases, initiation factors, and survivin may account for the disparate responses of breast cancers to genistein and daidzein diets. This study indicates that consumption of soy foods may increase metastasis.
KeywordsGenistein Daidzein Glycitein Cancer metastasis Soy isoflavones
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed form of cancer in women 40–55 years of age and is a major cause of cancer deaths . Metastatic breast cancer, where the cancer cells spread using motile mechanisms and establish tumors at distant vital sites, is much harder to eradicate and is often the cause of death from breast cancer. Interest in soy isoflavones has been fueled by studies that demonstrate a lower incidence of menopausal symptoms, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, breast and endometrial cancers in Asian women who have a diet rich in soy products [2, 3]. The anti-breast cancer effects of soy foods have been shown to be effective at early stages of carcinogenesis and most studies have focused on prevention of breast cancer risk by soy isoflavones [4, 5]. Moreover, their benefits as chemopreventives for breast cancer or as substitutes for hormone replacement therapies (HRT) remain controversial [2, 6, 7]. The effect of soy foods on established cancers have not been systematically examined and the effect of soy consumption for women at high risk for breast cancer or survivors of breast cancer are not known . The present study was designed to understand the impact of soy foods on established breast cancer.
Soy isoflavones are present in soy foods as aglycones where genistein, daidzein, and glycitein make up 50%, 40%, and 10%, respectively, of the total soybean isoflavones . Isoflavones are structurally similar to estrogen and genistein and daidzein, but not glycitein, can bind to and transactivate estrogen receptors (ER) with a higher affinity for ERβ [9, 10]. The chemopreventive cytotoxic effects of genistein have been shown for both ER (+) and ER (−) breast cancer cell lines including the MDA-MB-435 cells used in this study [11, 12, 13]. In vivo, genistein has also been shown to inhibit cancer initiation of chemically-induced rodent models [14, 15]. A study that used a lung metastatic variant of MDA-MB-435 reported that genistein (750 μg/g mouse chow) administered prior to mammary tumor cell inoculation or following surgical removal of the primary mammary tumor resulted in reduced lung metastases . Moreover, recent data indicate that genistein inhibits invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo in a number of cancers including breast cancer [16, 17, 18, 19]. However, other studies have shown that soy isoflavones, particularly genistein, increase the growth of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and tumors in ovariectomized nude mice and metastatic progression of prostate cancer [20, 21]. These contradictory results may be due to the fact that the hormonal milieu can be an important factor in determining the in vivo effects of isoflavones, where reports indicate that genistein and daidzein can block physiological estrogen-induced rat pituitary tumor cell growth .
At the molecular level, soy isoflavones have estrogenic/antiestrogenic, antioxidant and anti-angiogenic activities and may affect cancer due to their effects on apoptosis, cell cycle progression, growth, and differentiation. In addition to attenuating cell growth via inhibition of ER, genistein has also been shown to block growth factor- and cytokine-stimulated proliferation of cells. Genistein affects cellular function via inhibition of enzymes required to convert androgens to E2 (17 beta-steroid oxidoreductase and aromatases), tyrosine protein kinases, cytochrome p450 enzymes, and cycloxygenase 2 [6, 23, 24]. Genistein also modulates the activity of topoisomerase II, enzymes involved in phosphoinositide (PI) turnover, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling cascades, ER levels, growth factors and their receptor levels, mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPK) and p38 MAPK activity, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) secretion, NF-κB, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), Akt and WNT signaling pathways, and DNA methylation [17, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33].
The specific effects of daidzein or glycitein on signaling pathways have not been investigated as comprehensively as with genistein. At high concentrations, daidzein exerts anti proliferative effects by the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), disruption of mitochondrial transmembrane potential; downregulation of Bcl-2, growth factors, cytokines, cyclin dependent kinases, and DNA checkpoint proteins; and upregulation of Bax and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors [25, 34]. One study using 10 μM glycitein has shown inhibitory effects on cell growth and induction of apoptosis by reduced Bcl-2/Bax ratio in MCF-7 breast cancer cells . Interestingly, most of the studies detailing the effects of individual soy isoflavones focus on their effects on non-metastatic cell lines and the effect of soy isoflavones at multiple stages of the metastatic cascade remain to be elucidated . The present study was conducted to test the effects of soy isoflavones using the MDA-MB-435 cell line as a model for a highly invasive and metastatic cancer. Future studies will involve a more comprehensive investigation of the signaling pathways regulated by genistein, daidzein, and glycitein.
The origin of the MDA-MB-435 cell line has been questioned by comparative genomic hybridization studies that report MDA-MB-435 and M14 melanoma to be identical cell lines . However, as reviewed in , both cell lines may be of MDA-MB-435 breast cancer origin rather than of melanoma origin due to the following rationale. The MDA-MB-435 cell line was isolated from a pleural effusion of a female patient with breast cancer and still has two X chromosomes; expresses milk proteins and lipids; and when transfected with the nm23 metastasis suppressor gene, MDA-MB-435 cells show the morphologic features of normal breast epithelial cells, including acinus formation in three-dimensional culture . Moreover, MDA-MB-435 cells have been extensively used to investigate metastasis from the mammary fat pad and remains as one of few models available for experimental metastasis in nude mice [39, 40]. As with most metastatic breast cancers, this cell line is ER (−), and genistein is known to inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of MDA-MB-435 cells .
In the present study, we used a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged bone metastatic variant of the MDA-MB-435 cell line (described in ) to investigate the effect of dietary isoflavones (genistein and daidzein) individually and in the combination found in soy foods (genistein 50%, daidzein 40%, and glycitein 10%) on established breast cancer growth and metastasis. Herein, we report differential effects where genistein decreased while daidzein increased primary tumor growth, metastasis, and expression of genes and proteins involved with tumor progression. Combined soy isoflavones did not affect primary tumor growth but increased metastasis. Therefore, the results of this study indicate that consumption of soy products may have differential and complex effects on breast cancer progression and metastasis to different organs.
Materials and methods
A bone metastatic variant of GFP-MDA-MB-435 cell line was used (gift of Dr. Danny Welch, The University of Alabama at Birmingham) and cultured as described in . The development of this cell line and its usefulness as a model for experimental metastasis is described in .
Female athymic nu/nu mice, 5 week old (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were maintained and cared for as in [42, 43]. The mice received autoclaved AIN 76-A phytoestrogen-free diet (Tek Global, Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI) and water ad libitum. This protocol was approved by the Universidad Central del Caribe IACUC.
GFP-MDA-MB-435 cells (~1 × 106) in Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) were injected into the mammary fat pad under isofluorane inhalation as described in [43, 44]. After tumor establishment (1 week post-inoculation), the animals were randomly divided into control and experimental groups.
Study 1. Nude mice (n = 10/group) were orally gavaged with vehicle (90% corn oil, 10% ethanol), 10 mg/kg BW genistein, or 10 mg/kg BW daidzein in a 100 μl volume three times per week. Study 2. Nude mice (n = 10/group) were orally gavaged with vehicle or soy isoflavones (10 mg/kg-BW genistein, 9 mg/kg-BW daidzein, and 1 mg/kg-BW glycitein) in a 100 μl volume three times per week. Treatments continued until sacrifice at d 78.
For all treatments, some early deaths occurred due to metastatic burden. Therefore, only 8 mice/group remained for the final analysis.
Whole body fluorescence image analysis
The mice were imaged following tumor establishment, and twice per week thereafter, until d 77 (one d prior to sacrifice at d 78). Tumor progression was monitored by fluorescence image analysis and quantified as in . Relative tumor area was calculated as the fluorescence intensity of each tumor on day of imaging relative to the fluorescence intensity of the same tumor on d 01 of diet administration using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
Analysis of metastases
Following sacrifice, lungs, kidneys, liver, femurs, and hearts were excised and immediately stored in liquid nitrogen. Stored organs were thawed and analyzed using an Olympus MVX10 fluorescence stereoscope and an Olympus DP71 microscope digital camera (Olympus America, Inc, Melville, NY) as in .
Statistical analyses were done using Microsoft excel. P values were determined using Students t test and values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.
Real time RT-PCR analysis
Solid primary tumors (n = 3/treatment group) were excised, cut in half, and immediately stored in “RNAlater” (Ambion, Austin, TX) for analysis as described in . Total RNA extraction and gDNA elimination was performed using the Qiagen RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA (0.5 μg) was used to synthesize cDNA using C-03 RT2 First Strand Kit (SA Biosciences, Frederick, MD), and gene expression profiles were investigated using the human PI3-K/Akt signaling Pathway (PAHS-058A) RT2 Profiler™ PCR arrays (SA Biosciences, Frederick, MD). The spreadsheets, gene tables, and template formulas included with the PCR array package were used to calculate relative changes in gene expression as described in .
Western blot analysis
Flash frozen primary tumors were lysed using a homogenizer (Brinkmann Polytron, Mississauga, ONT, Canada) in lysis buffer (10% SDS, 10% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton-X 100, 1% Igepal, and protease and phosphatase inhibitors) and quantified using the Precision Red protein assay kit (Cytoskeleton, Inc. Denver, CO). Equal total protein amounts were resolved on SDS-PAGE gels and Western blotted using anti-RhoA, anti-Rac1, anti-Cdc42, and anti-PAK1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), anti-GFP (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-actin (Sigma–Aldrich Comp., St. Louis, MO), anti-eIF4G and anti-eIF4E (Epitomics, Inc., Burlingame, CA), and anti-survivin (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA) antibodies. The integrated density of positive bands was quantified using ImageJ software. Quantification of tumor proteins was ensured by normalizing the integrated densities of positive bands for all antibodies to the integrated density of the same tumor lysate western blotted for GFP or actin.
Effect of soy isoflavones on primary mammary tumor growth
Study 1: effects of major soy isoflavones, genistein and daidzein, on primary mammary tumor growth
Study 2: effects of combined soy isoflavones on primary mammary tumor growth
Since individual treatments of genistein or daidzein produced clearly disparate effects on mammary tumor growth, we performed a second study to investigate the effects of a combined diet of genistein, daidzein, and glycitein, the major soy isoflavones in the ratio commonly found in fermented soy foods. Treatment with combined soy isoflavones resulted in a similar response as vehicle treatment in primary tumor growth (Fig. 1a). This data on the effect of combined soy isoflavones on ER (−) mammary tumor growth is similar to a previous study with ER (+) mammary tumor models that reported no effect of soy isoflavone extract on mammary tumor growth in nude mice .
Effect of soy isoflavones on metastasis
Study 1: effects of major soy isoflavones, genistein and daidzein, on metastasis
Even though the number of mice with lung metastases following genistein were slightly reduced compared to vehicle controls (Fig. 2e), as has been reported before by histopathology of lung metastases , the total area of fluorescent lesions in the lungs from genistein-treated mice was not statistically significant from controls. Lungs from daidzein-treated mice presented with increased number and area of metastatic lesions with an average of 74 metastatic foci/lung compared to 35 metastatic foci/lung from vehicle-treated mice. The lung metastases from daidzein treated mice were larger than the foci from vehicle treated mice with a statistically significant 12-fold increase in area of fluorescence (P < 0.05, Fig. 2a).
Similarly, daidzein treatment exhibited more heart metastases than vehicle or genistein treatments. Heart metastases were observed from 50% of vehicle, 37.5% of genistein, and 87.5% of daidzein treated mice (Fig. 2e). Vehicle or genistein treated mice demonstrated an average of 2 metastatic foci/heart while daidzein resulted in an average of 4.75 metastatic foci/heart. Daidzein treatment demonstrated a 14-fold significant increase in both area and integrated density of heart metastases compared to vehicle (P < 0.03, Fig. 2b).
In the kidneys, 37.5% of vehicle or genistein-treated mice and 87% of daidzein-treated mice presented with metastases (Fig. 2e). Vehicle treatment resulted in an average area of kidney metastasis/mouse of 11.6 ± 7.1 mm2 while the mice from the genistein treatment demonstrated an average area of 4.9 ± 1.7 mm2 and daidzein treatment resulted in an average area of 18.9 ± 9.7 mm2. However, both the changes in area or integrated density of metastatic foci in the kidney in response to genistein or daidzein were not significant when compared to vehicle controls (data not shown). Overall our data demonstrates a lung and heart metastases promoting role for daidzein in ER (−) cancers.
In vehicle controls, 75% of mice presented with bone metastases with an average of ~6 metastatic foci/femur with metastases. Only 12.5% of the genistein-treated and 37.5% of daidzein-treated mice presented with bone metastases (Fig. 2e). This dramatic decrease in bone metastases in genistein-treated mice was statistically significant (P < 0.05), while the bone metastatic response to daidzein was not statistically significant when compared to vehicle controls (Fig. 2c). For liver metastases, all of the vehicle-treated mice demonstrated liver metastases at an average of 29 metastatic foci/liver. From the genistein treatment, 50% mice presented with liver metastases at an average of 3 metastatic foci/liver and 75% of daidzein-treated mice demonstrated liver metastases with an average of 12.5 metastatic foci/liver (Fig. 2e). Genistein significantly decreased the average integrated density of liver metastases/mouse by 500% compared to vehicle controls (P < 0.05). The observed decrease in liver metastatic efficiency in response to daidzein was not statistically significant (Fig. 2d). Therefore, dietary treatment with genistein specifically decreased bone and liver metastases.
Study 2: effects of soy isoflavones on metastasis
The effect of combined soy (genistein:daidzein:glycitein, 5:4:1) treatment on established mammary fat pad tumors was tested in two independent experiments that showed similar results. Since the nude mouse litters as well as the passage and amount of cells used were different for Study 1 (comparison of vehicle, genistein, or daidzein diets) and Study 2 (comparison of vehicle with soy isoflavone combination, genistein, daidzein, and glycitein), the results were analyzed separately and compared with the vehicle treatments for that study.
As shown in Fig. 3, both vehicle and soy-treated groups demonstrated lung metastases in a majority of the mice. Lungs from soy isoflavone-treated mice presented with increased number and area of metastatic lesions with an average of 154 metastatic foci/lung compared to 31 metastatic foci/lung from vehicle-treated mice. The average numbers of metastatic foci/lung (35 and 31) are comparable for the vehicle-treated mice from both Study 1 and Study 2. The increased number and area of lung metastases in the soy-treated mice resulted in a ~36-fold statistically significant increase in integrated density of fluorescence (P < 0.05, Fig. 3a, f).
Vehicle treated mice did not demonstrate any heart metastases while treatment with soy isoflavones resulted in 50% of the mice showing heart metastases with an average of 6.5 metastatic foci/heart and an average integrated density of 1.9 (Fig. 3b). In vehicle controls, 20% of mice presented with bone metastases with an average of ~1 metastatic lesion/femur with metastases. Following soy isoflavone treatment, 50% of mice presented with bone metastases with an average of 44 metastatic foci/femur and a 14-fold significant increase in integrated density (P < 0.05, Fig. 3c). For liver metastases, 50% of the vehicle-treated mice and 87.5% of soy-treated mice demonstrated fluorescent metastatic foci where the vehicle treated mice demonstrated an average of 10 metastatic foci/liver while the soy treated mice presented with 169 metastatic foci/liver with a fivefold statistically significant increase in integrated density compared to vehicle (P < 0.05, Fig. 3d). Similarly, kidney metastases were also significantly increased by the soy treatment where only 20% of vehicle treated mice demonstrated 2 metastatic foci/kidney while soy isoflavone treatment resulted in 37.5% of mice with kidney metastases demonstrating 20 metastatic foci/kidney and a ~25-fold increase in average integrated density (P < 0.05, Fig. 3e). These results indicate that although combined dietary soy isoflavones do not affect primary tumor size, consumption of soy can significantly increase metastasis to all distant organs examined.
Effect of soy isoflavones on expression of metastasis-promoting molecules
Effect of soy isoflavones on gene expression
Effect of soy isoflavones on expression of PI3-kinase pathway genes
Gene symbol—complete name
Fold change, P value
AKT1—v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1
CDC42—Cell division cycle 42 (GTP binding protein)
CTNNB1—Catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1
EIF4E—Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E
EIF4G1—Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1
GRB2—Growth factor receptor-bound protein 2
GSK3B—Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta
IRAK1—Interleukin-1 receptor associated kinase
IRS1—Insulin receptor substrate 1
MAPK1—Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1
PABPC1—Poly(A) binding protein
PAK1—p21 protein (Cdc42/Rac)-activated kinase 1
RAC1—Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1
RASA1—RAS p21 protein activator (GTPase activating protein)
RHOA—Ras homolog gene family, member A
TIRAP—Toll-interleukin 1 receptor (TIR) domain containing adaptor protein
Compared to vehicle, genistein significantly dowregulated 10/84 genes (12%) and daidzein upregulated 9/84 (11%) genes, consistent with decreased mammary tumor growth by genistein and increase by daidzein. These numbers are consistent with the predicted value under the null hypothesis since ~100 genes were studied, the expected number with P-values < 0.05 would be ~5. Genistein downregulated Ras/mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway: MAPK −1.3-fold, P = 0.06), GRB2, and RASA1 (Ras GTPase activating protein) (P < 0.05) and cell survival (AKT1) genes, while daidzein significantly increased Ras/MAPK pathway and cell cycle progression regulators: GRB2, MAPK, JUN, CCND1 (cyclin D1), CTNNB1 (beta catenin), and IRS1 (insulin receptor substrate 1). Genistein decreased PABPC1 (poly(A) binding protein) and daidzein increased EIF4G1 (eukaryotic initiation factor F4G1) expression implicating differential protein translational regulation of mammary tumor growth by soy isoflavones. Genistein also downregulated genes involved with invasion and metastasis such as RHOA, RAC1, CDC42, and PAK1 (p21/Cdc42/Rac1-activated kinase 1).
The combined soy isoflavones treatment did not show such dramatic changes in expression of genes involved in the PI3-K/Akt pathway, and only demonstrated a single gene upregulated (EIF4E) and a single gene downregulated (TIRAP) in a statistically significant manner (Fig. 4). A number of genes that were downregulated by genistein were also downregulated by the soy treatment as were genes upregulated by daidzein (see Supplemental Information Table 1). Interestingly, the majority of these changes were not statistically significant at a P value < 0.05. Therefore, combined soy isoflavone treatment may neutralize the effects of the major soy isoflavones genistein and daidzein in regulating the expression of PI3-K pathway genes.
Effect of soy isoflavones on protein expression
An aggressive bone metastatic variant of the MDA-MB-435 cancer cell line was used as a model system to investigate the effect of soy isoflavones on mammary cancer progression. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the effects of dietary soy isoflavones were assessed on bone metastases from primary mammary tumors in a nude mouse model. Investigation of the effect of dietary cancer chemopreventives on bone metastasis is important because most breast cancers in humans preferentially metastasize to the bone . Because the MDA-MB-435 cells were inoculated at the mammary fat pad, this strategy enabled the investigation of metastases to a number of distant organs. Our results demonstrate an inhibitory role for genistein and a promoting role for daidzein and combined soy isoflavones in breast cancer progression. Genistein (5,7-dihydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) chromen-4-one or 4′,5,7-Trihydroxyisoflavone) and daidzein (7-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) chromen-4-one or 4′,7-Dihydroxyisoflavone) are structurally different only in the hydroxyl group in position 5. Glycitein (4′,7-dihydroxy-6-methoxyisoflavone) has a methoxy group in position 6, and as in the case of daidzein, glycitein does not have the hydroxyl group in position 5. Nevertheless, as shown in the present study, this slight structural difference could play a crucial role in the estrogenic/antiestrogenic (or other biological) activities of these compounds.
Isoflavones have short half-lives (~8 h), and nearly all are excreted within 24 h after ingestion . Results from a recent report using rats show that genistein can be detected in serum 5 min post-oral administration . Because of rapid mouse metabolism, a 10 mg/kg BW mouse dose can be considered equivalent to 1 mg/kg BW in humans (an approximation of a high Asian soy diet). In our studies, isoflavones were administered by gavage three times a week at 10 mg/kg BW for individual isoflavones and at 10 mg/kg BW genistein, 9 mg/kg BW daidzein, and 1 mg/kg BW glycitein for combined isoflavones. Thus, the mice received a continuous isoflavone diet. The diet of 10 mg/kg-BW genistein in a ~20–25 mg mouse works out to be 0.2 mg genistein/mouse at ~7 mM concentration. Although we did not determine the levels of soy isoflavones in tumor tissue, previous mouse studies have reported isoflavone levels at 1.2 mg/g tissue daidzein and 6.5 mg/g tissue for genistein following genistein or soy diets . The plasma concentrations of mice receiving dietary genistein similar to those used in the present study have been reported to be in the range of the plasma concentrations found in humans after soy consumption [33, 57].
We demonstrate an inhibitory role for genistein and a promoting role for daidzein in tumor growth and metastasis. Moreover, combined soy isoflavones (genistein, daidzein, and glycitein) in the ratio found in soy foods did not affect tumor growth at the mammary fat pad but increased metastasis to all organs tested. These results were obtained with high dietary concentrations and the effect of soy isoflavones in our system at low concentrations remain to be tested. Genistein is known to have a biphasic effect on tumor growth and metastasis, where low concentrations are stimulatory and high concentrations are inhibitory . Similar to our results, an inhibitory role for genistein in mammary tumor growth and metastatic progression has been reported for both ER (+) and ER (−) breast cancers [16, 58], while daidzein was shown to stimulate cell and tumor growth of ER (+) MCF-7 non-metastatic breast cancer cells in ovariectomized nude mice . Moreover, in the ER β positive MDA-MB-231 cell line, even though genistein inhibited cell growth at all concentrations tested, dietary genistein did not affect growth of subcutaneous tumors from MDA-MB-231 cells in nude mice . Herein, using the highly metastatic ER (−) MDA-MB-435 cell line to establish mammary fat pad tumors in nude mice, we show that dietary daidzein increased tumor growth and metastatic efficiency indicating that the tumor promoting effect of daidzein is not ER dependent. Dietary genistein and soy phytochemical concentrate have been shown to reduce primary tumor growth and metastasis in bladder and prostate cancer models [17, 33], while other studies have shown that soy isoflavones, particularly genistein, increased the growth of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and tumors in ovariectomized nude mice and metastatic progression of prostate cancer [20, 21]. The results shown herein using an ER (−) Her-2 (++) highly metastatic cancer cell line may reflect the role of soy isoflavones on mammary tumor growth and metastases from such aggressive cancers.
Mice that received dietary genistein specifically demonstrated reduced bone and liver metastases in a statistically significant manner indicating a potential site-specific inhibition of extravasation and (or) secondary tumor establishment at these sites. Previous studies have shown that genistein inhibits MMP secretion  and cell invasion , which may lead to the observed reduction in invasion to distant sites in genistein-treated mice. Unlike previous studies that showed that genistein causes a decrease in lung metastases from the MDA-MB-435 lung metastatic variant and prostate and bladder cancer models [16, 17, 33], our data did not show a significant difference in lung metastases in response to dietary genistein. This difference in the genistein response maybe due to differences in the protocols, where; (1) we used a bone metastatic variant of the parental MDA-MB-435 cell line, (2) we did not initiate dietary treatments until mammary tumors were established (~0.5 mm2), and (3) we administered genistein at 10 mg/kg BW 3× a week by direct oral gavage instead of incorporating into the mouse chow. The preventive effects of genistein on metastasis that have also been shown previously using the same (Her-2)++ MDA-MB-435 model  may be due to the reported inhibitory effects of genistein on Her-2 expression and phosphorylation, thus activation . Future studies will assess the effect of genistein on invasion/metastasis of mammary tumors using a cell line such as MDA-MB-231 that does not overexpress Her-2 or EGFR but exhibits some lung metastasis in the nude mouse model.
We have previously shown that daidzein promoted cell functions relevant for metastasis such as FAK activity, focal adhesion assembly, extension of actin structures that promote cell migration, and cell migration to a greater level than genistein in breast cancer cell lines . The present study expands these observations to show that dietary daidzein promotes lung, and heart metastases compared to vehicle and genistein treatments. Moreover, dietary soy isoflavones significantly promoted metastases to all organs evaluated. The significant increased incidence of lung and heart metastases in daidzein and soy isoflavone diets indicate higher incidence of cancer cell intravasation into the blood stream since the heart and lungs are the first organs encountered by invasive cancer cells in blood vessels. Since the increased metastases caused by the daidzein treatment parallels the increased primary tumor growth in response to dietary daidzein, elevated metastatic efficiency of the daidzein-treated mice may reflect the higher numbers of cells that left the primary mammary tumors and invaded into the circulatory system. The genistein treated mice that presented with smaller mammary tumors but did not significantly change lung, heart, or kidney metastases, indicates that metastatic efficiency of genistein-treated mice is not directly correlated with primary mammary tumor size. This observation is also reflected in mice following combined soy isoflavone treatment that did not show changes in primary tumor size. This null effect on primary tumor growth by dietary soy isoflavones may be due to a potential negation of the observed disparate effects of genistein and daidzein on primary tumor growth. However, soy isoflavone treatment increased metastases to all organs indicating that this effect was not dependent on primary mammary tumor size or organ site but a non-specific overall increase in metastatic efficiency by the combined effect of genistein, daidzein, and glycitein at a 5:4:1 ratio. These effects were exemplified in some cases by the clear presence of cancer cells in the gastrointestinal tract of mice after combined soy isoflavones diets (data not shown).
The differential effects of soy isoflavones on mammary tumor progression, i.e. primary tumor growth and metastasis prevention to bone and liver by genistein, increased primary mammary tumor progression and metastasis to the heart and lungs by daidzein, and promotion of metastasis to all organs by combined genistein, daidzein, and glycitein may be due to a number of reasons. (1) Potential concentration-dependent effects of each compound at different organ sites can exist due to unequal distribution of the dietary isoflavones and their metabolites leading to site-specific effects on the expression of metastasis promoters and suppressors. For instance, a recent study reported that following daidzein consumption, high levels of daidzein and its metabolite equol were found in bone tissue of mice . Thus, levels of daidzein may reach bone tissue in concentrations high enough to be inhibitory even though the decreased trend in metastasis to the bone following daidzein diets was not statistically significant when compared to vehicle controls. Studies using the MCF-7 ER (+) breast cancer cell line have shown that physiological concentrations of genistein induced while pharmacological concentrations of genistein reduced expression of genes that regulate cell cycle progression . Therefore, higher concentrations of genistein at bone and liver may function to specifically inhibit establishment of metastases at these sites. (2) In addition, the soy isoflavones may have differential effects on tumor cell intravasation and extravasation at various organ sites. Currently we are conducting site-specific molecular analysis of the molecular signatures at distant organs following soy isoflavone diets and expect to correlate the changes in signaling molecules with dietary interventions.
The observed tumor and organ site-dependent differences in the effects of daidzein, genistein or combined soy isoflavones may be due to differences in the signaling molecules that are expressed by the tumor cells in response to these compounds. Therefore, gene expression profiles were performed on RNA extracted from excised primary mammary tumors of mice following vehicle or dietary soy isoflavone treatments. Since the major isoflavones found in soy (genistein, daidzein and glycitein) have been shown to regulate cancer cell survival [10, 34, 56], the present study was conducted to determine the gene expression profiles of PI3-K signaling pathway molecules from primary mammary tumors of mice following dietary genistein, daidzein or soy combination treatments. PI3-K-catalyzed phosphorylation of the conversion of membrane phophatidyl inositol bis phosphate (PIP2) to phosphatidyl inositol 3,4,5-phosphate (PIP3) results in the activation of a number of signaling pathways including Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), Ras/MAPK, and FAK/Rac/Cdc42 pathways that can lead to cancer cell survival, proliferation, and invasion [49, 50].
Our PCR array data show increases in the expression of a number of genes that regulate cell growth and cell cycle progression and protein translation in response to daidzein while genistein reduced the expression of genes implicated in cell survival, proliferation, and invasion. Moreover, animals that were on the soy combination diet showed an increase in the expression of one gene that regulates protein synthesis, and a decrease in the expression of one gene that is involved in the innate immune system response. However, transcriptional regulation of genes may not indicate post-transcriptional, translational, or post translational control. A recent study reported that genistein increased tumor levels of FAK, p38 MAPK, and heat shock protein (HSP27) but that these proteins were not activated by phosphorylation . Therefore, the reported differences in gene and protein expression may not indicate protein activity and regulation of specific protein activities by soy isoflavones will be the focus of future studies.
Our novel report that in mammary tumors, dietary genistein significantly decreased both gene and protein expression of Rho GTPases (Rho, Rac, and Cdc42) and the downstream effector of Rac and Cdc42, PAK1, are significant for understanding the mechanism by which genistein inhibits cancer cell invasion. Rho GTPases are known to promote cancer progression by regulation of actin dynamics, cell-extracellular matrix interactions, cell cycle progression, cell survival, and invasion [64, 65]. At high concentrations, genistein acts as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and inhibits Rho-dependent focal adhesion assembly and actin cytoskeleton reorganization . The present data indicates that dietary genistein may reduce breast cancer progression via transcriptional regulation of Rho GTPases and PAK.
The reduced PABCP levels by genistein may also indicate a global decrease in mRNA translation that may account for the reduced expression of all of the proteins that were tested. Other microarray studies have shown that high concentrations of genistein reduced expression of genes that regulate cell cycle progression and increased expression of pro-apoptotic genes . The reduction of GRB2 and MAPK expression by genistein in the mammary tumors may also lead to a decrease in Ras/MAPK activity as seen in previous studies . A recent PCR array study that used human prostate cancer cell lines to determine the effect of genistein and daidzein reported that 40 μM genistein or 110 μM daidzein was effective at inhibiting cell cycle progression and upregulated cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors and cyclin H and downregulated cyclin dependent kinases . Our study, that used genistein and daidzein at physiologically relevant concentrations, report that while dietary genistein decreased the expression of GRB2 and MAPK, dietary daidzein significantly increased the expression of cell cycle regulators and signaling molecules that promote cell cycle progression (Cyclin D1, β catenin, GRB2, MAPK, JUN). Therefore, this data indicates that at dietary concentrations, genistein and daidzein can exert differential effects on genes that regulate cancer cell invasion, survival, and proliferation and thus, contribute to tumor malignancy.
Daidzein treatment did not change gene expression of Rho GTPases or PAK1 in mammary tumors. However, daidzein significantly increased protein expression of Rac, a central regulator of actin cytoskeletal changes during cancer cell invasion . Eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF4G (gene and protein) and eIF4E (protein) were also upregulated by daidzein. The eIF4F complex (eIF4G, E, A, B), that scans the 5′UTR and unwinds mRNA secondary structure to expose the start codon for translation initiation, has been shown to specifically regulate the expression of mRNAs with long, highly structured UTRs. The eIF4F complex members have been shown to be overexpressed in advanced cancer and to be essential for translation of a subset of proteins that regulate cellular bioenergetics, survival, and proliferation [70, 71, 72]. Our results show that translational regulation may be a mechanism by which daidzein exerts differential effects on cancer progression because a number of proteins were elevated in the mammary tumors following daidzein including survivin, an inhibitor of apoptosis implicated with cancer malignancy that has been shown to be sensitive to eIF4E levels [51, 52, 73]. Recent studies have associated increased survivin expression with cancer malignancy . As shown by a previous study, where reduced survivin levels by combined genistein and tamoxifen was attributed to apoptosis in breast cancer cells , our data show reduced survivin levels in mammary tumors in response to genistein diets. Since increased survivin levels are expected to reduce caspase activity and thus, apoptosis, differential expression of survivin in tumors following daidzein or genistein diets may contribute to the disparate effects of genistein and daidzein on tumor growth and metastasis.
Dietary daidzein also increased IRS1 levels in tumors suggesting that insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR) signaling may be involved with increased breast cancer progression by daidzein. Statistically significant IRAK1 upregulation by both genistein (P < 0.006) and daidzein (P < 0.001) may indicate a soy isoflavone mediated activation of Nf-κB and MAPK signaling. However, since IRAK1 needs to be ubiquitinated to be active, increased IRAK1 expression may not necessarily result in enhanced NF-κB activity . Similarly, upregulation of GSK3B gene expression by daidzein is not indicative of upregulation of its activity, which is downregulated by Akt signaling . Future studies will determine whether expression of these genes in response to dietary daidzein results in enhanced protein expression and activity that contribute to cancer malignancy.
Combined soy isoflavones that significantly increased metastasis did not affect Rho GTPase expression but significantly increased eIF4E levels. Therefore, this study indicates that modulation of protein synthesis may be a novel mechanism of regulation for cancer metastasis. Since soy isoflavones did not change primary tumor size and a number of genes that were regulated by genistein or daidzein were up- or down-regulated by the combination diet in a parallel but statistically non-significant manner, it is possible that the effects of genistein and daidzein were neutralized in the primary tumors by the combined soy isoflavones treatment. Our results suggest that the increase in distant metastasis by combined soy isoflavones occurs via activation of molecular mechanism(s) independent of the PI3-K pathway. It is possible that the presence of glycitein, albeit at a much smaller concentration, could have contributed to a combinatorial effect on metastasis. A recent study reported that glycitein may act similar to genistein by increasing apoptosis via reduction of the Bcl-2/Bax ratio . Future experiments will delineate the specific effects of glycitein as well as the molecular mechanisms that regulate cancer metastasis following dietary soy isoflavones.
This study indicates that consumption of soy products may have differential and complex effects on breast cancer progression and metastasis to different organs. Recent studies have shown that while dietary soy isoflavones do not affect breast cancer, they may increase the risk of colorectal cancer among women and prostate cancer among men . Others have shown that soy food consumption was significantly associated with decreased risk of death and recurrence for breast cancer . Thus, this investigation is of considerable interest in the debate about whether soy isoflavones promote or prevent breast cancer, particularly the perils of using soy in women diagnosed with breast cancer or those at high risk. However, caution must be exercised with interpretation of our results, since this study represents the effect of a single concentration of soy isoflavones that reflect a high soy diet conducted with an ER negative cancer cell line in non-ovariectomized nude mice.
This study was supported by AICR IIG 03-31-06 and NIH/NIGMS SC3GM084824 to SD and NIH/NCCR G12RR003035 and NIH/NIGMS S06GM050695 to UCC. We thank Alexander Schlachterman for assistance with animal protocols and Kristin M. Wall for image analysis.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- 4.Lampe JW, Nishino Y, Ray RM, Wu C, Li W, Lin MG, Gao DL, Hu Y, Shannon J, Stalsberg H, Porter PL, Frankenfeld CL, Wahala K, Thomas DB (2007) Plasma isoflavones and fibrocystic breast conditions and breast cancer among women in Shanghai, China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:2579–2586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Sakamoto T, Horiguchi H, Oguma E, Kayama F (2009) Effects of diverse dietary phytoestrogens on cell growth, cell cycle and apoptosis in estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer cells. J Nutr Biochem. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.06.010
- 18.Magee PJ, McGlynn H, Rowland IR (2004) Differential effects of isoflavones and lignans on invasiveness of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Lett 20:835–841Google Scholar
- 25.Rabiau N, Kossai M, Braud M, Chalabi N, Satih S, Bignon YJ, Bernard-Gallon DJ (2010) Genistein and daidzein act on a panel of genes implicated in cell cycle and angiogenesis by Polymerase Chain Reaction arrays in human prostate cancer cell lines. Cancer Epidemiol 34:200–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52.Graff JR, Konicek BW, Vincent TM, Lynch RL, Monteith D, Weir SN, Schwier P, Capen A, Goode RL, Dowless MS, Chen Y, Zhang H, Sissons S, Cox K, McNulty AM, Parsons SH, Wang T, Sams L, Geeganage S, Douglass LE, Neubauer BL, Dean NM, Blanchard K, Shou J, Stancato LF, Carter JH, Marcusson EG (2007) Therapeutic suppression of translation initiation factor eIF4E expression reduces tumor growth without toxicity. J Clin Invest 117:2638–2648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 59.Ju YH, Fultz J, Allred KF, Doerge DR, Helferich WG (2006) Effects of dietary daidzein and its metabolite, equol, at physiological concentrations on the growth of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (MCF-7) tumors implanted in ovariectomized athymic mice. Carcinogenesis 27:856–863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 62.Azios NG, Dharmawardhane S (2005) Role of phytoestrogens in modulating focal adhesions and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity in breast cancer cells. In: Li J, Li SA, Llombart-Bosch A (eds) Hormonal carcinogenesis. Springer-Verlag, NY, pp 300–307Google Scholar
- 69.Bosco EE, Mulloy JC, Zheng Y (2009) Rac1 GTPase: a “Rac” of all trades. Cell Mol Life Sci 66:370–374Google Scholar
- 76.Ward HA, Kuhnle GG, Mulligan AA, Lentjes MA, Luben RN, Khaw KT (2010) Breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk in relation to phytoestrogen intake derived from an improved database. Am J Clin Nutr 91:440–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar